2024-08-15 | | Total: 4

We present a novel approach to querying classical inconsistent description logic (DL) knowledge bases by adopting a~paraconsistent semantics with the four Belnapian values: exactly true ($\mathbf{T}$), exactly false ($\mathbf{F}$), both ($\mathbf{B}$), and neither ($\mathbf{N}$). In contrast to prior studies on paraconsistent DLs, we allow truth value operators in the query language, which can be used to differentiate between answers having contradictory evidence and those having only positive evidence. We present a reduction to classical DL query answering that allows us to pinpoint the precise combined and data complexity of answering queries with values in paraconsistent $\mathcal{ALCHI}$ and its sublogics. Notably, we show that tractable data complexity is retained for Horn DLs. We present a comparison with repair-based inconsistency-tolerant semantics, showing that the two approaches are incomparable.

We explore the problem of explaining observations starting from a classically inconsistent theory by adopting a paraconsistent framework. We consider two expansions of the well-known Belnap--Dunn paraconsistent four-valued logic $\mathsf{BD}$: $\mathsf{BD}_\circ$ introduces formulas of the form $\circ\phi$ (the information on $\phi$ is reliable), while $\mathsf{BD}_\triangle$ augments the language with $\triangle\phi$'s (there is information that $\phi$ is true). We define and motivate the notions of abduction problems and explanations in $\mathsf{BD}_\circ$ and $\mathsf{BD}_\triangle$ and show that they are not reducible to one another. We analyse the complexity of standard abductive reasoning tasks (solution recognition, solution existence, and relevance / necessity of hypotheses) in both logics. Finally, we show how to reduce abduction in $\mathsf{BD}_\circ$ and $\mathsf{BD}_\triangle$ to abduction in classical propositional logic, thereby enabling the reuse of existing abductive reasoning procedures.

For a sequence of random graphs, the limit law we refer to is the existence of a limiting probability of any graph property that can be expressed in terms of predicate logic. A zero-one limit law is shown by Shelah and Spencer for Erd\"{o}s-Renyi graphs given that the connection rate has an irrational exponent. We show a limit law for preferential attachment graphs which admit a P\'{o}lya urn representation. The two extreme cases of the parametric model, the uniform attachment graph and the sequential Barab\'{a}si-Albert model, are covered separately as they exhibit qualitative differences regarding the distribution of cycles of bounded length in the graph.

Countable $\mathcal{L}$-structures $\mathcal{N}$ whose isomorphism class supports a permutation invariant probability measure in the logic action have been characterized by Ackerman-Freer-Patel to be precisely those $\mathcal{N}$ which have no algebraicity. Here we characterize those countable $\mathcal{L}$-structure $\mathcal{N}$ whose isomorphism class supports a quasi-invariant probability measure. These turn out to be precisely those $\mathcal{N}$ which are not "highly algebraic" -- we say that $\mathcal{N}$ is highly algebraic if outside of every finite $F$ there is some $b$ and a tuple $\bar{a}$ disjoint from $b$ so that $b$ has a finite orbit under the pointwise stabilizer of $\bar{a}$ in $\mathrm{Aut}(\mathcal{N})$. As a bi-product of our proof we show that whenever the isomorphism class of $\mathcal{N}$ admits a quasi-invariant measure, then it admits one with continuous Radon--Nikodym cocycles.