Total: 1
Millions of users turn to consumer AI chatbots to discuss behavioral and mental health concerns. While this presents unprecedented opportunities to deliver population-level support, it also highlights an urgent need to develop rigorous and scalable safety evaluations. Here we introduce SIM-VAIL, an AI chatbot auditing framework that captures how harmful AI chatbot responses manifest across a range of mental-health contexts. SIM-VAIL pairs a simulated human user, harboring a distinct psychiatric vulnerability and conversational intent, with an audited frontier AI chatbot. It scores conversation turns on 13 clinically relevant risk dimensions, enabling context-dependent, temporally resolved assessment of mental-health risk. Across 810 conversations, encompassing over 90,000 turn-level ratings and 30 psychiatric user profiles, we find that significant risk occurs across virtually all user phenotypes. Risk manifested across most of the 9 consumer AI chatbot models audited, albeit mitigated in more modern variants. Rather than arising abruptly, risk accumulated over multiple turns. Risk profiles were phenotype-dependent, indicating that behaviors that appear supportive in general settings are liable to be maladaptive when they align with mechanisms that sustain a user's vulnerability. Multivariate risk patterns revealed trade-offs across dimensions, suggesting that mitigation targeting one harm domain can exacerbate others. These findings identify a novel failure mode in human-AI interactions, which we term Vulnerability-Amplifying Interaction Loops (VAILs), and underscore the need for multi-dimensional approaches to risk quantification. SIM-VAIL provides a scalable evaluation framework for quantifying how mental-health risk is distributed across user phenotypes, conversational trajectories, and clinically grounded behavioral dimensions, offering a foundation for targeted safety improvements.