Total: 1
The NBSS (normalized biomass size spectrum) is a common, intuitive approach for the study of natural ecosystems. However, very few studies have been dedicated to verifying possible bias, flaws, and paradoxes in this widely used method. An evident issue of this method, that best exemplifies its discrepancies and paradoxes, is the use of intriguing non-biomass units (such as abundance, biomass flux, or pseudo-abundance units) on NBSS plots, that are intended to visualize biomass spectra. The main objectives of this study were to verify, test and analyze the procedures involved in transformations that lead to the popular NBSS plot, and to check for the correctness of currently used units, while testing the hypothesis that NBSS indeed represents biomass, not abundance or biomass flux (dB/dM), while developing i.) a new conceptual framework, ii.) new terminology, iii.) a novel back-transformation method, iv.) a simple, new calculation method, that yields the best (i.e., least biased) representation of the original biomass vs body mass distribution shape, numerical values, dimensions, and units. Extensive tests with in-situ and synthetic (simulated) data were used to verify the procedures involved in transformations that lead to the popular NBSS plots, and to compare the original biomass distribution data with the binned outputs. Original biomass units and dimensions are retained in the novel backtransformed normalized biomass spectrum (bNBS), proposed and described herein. The proposed bNBS constitutes a new, improved approach of robust size spectra science, that allows for quantitative inter-comparisons of biomass spectra across regions and time periods.