Total: 1
Satellite precipitation products such as IMERG exhibit biases that vary with terrain, season, and precipitation regime, leaving the applicability boundaries of machine learning correction unclear. This study proposes the Terrain-Moisture-Intensity (TMI) framework, centered on mechanism purity, extending the correction problem from purely algorithmic optimization to physical consistency diagnosis. A proof-of-concept study in Hunan Province employs IMERG V07, SRTM DEM, and ERA5 variables (tcwv, u10, v10). Ablation results indicate that, under the conditions of this study, terrain-moisture relationships are predominantly additive: RF-Full yields merely +0.001 R^2 gain over LR-Full, while bias rises to 1.282 mm d^-1; MAE decreases by approximately 14%, reflecting a trade-off between tail-fitting improvement and mean shift. SHAP diagnostics identify three categories of boundaries. Spatially, Central Hunan exhibits significant degradation (R^2=0.133) despite strong variable activation, consistent with mechanism fragmentation induced by mixed terrain. Temporally, u10 undergoes directional reversal between summer and spring (+0.096 to -0.156), presenting "silent failure." Extreme precipitation (>=50 mm d^-1) approximates a mechanism saturation frontier rather than isolated out-of-distribution samples, with DEM showing the largest relative amplification in SHAP disorder (+150%). The results demonstrate that machine learning correction performance is primarily constrained by mechanism purity. A pre-registered cross-regional test (Hunan, Guangxi, Guangdong) confirms this screening capability out of sample: a priori coherence proxies predict correction efficiency with a mean absolute error of 2.6 percentage points, while the transfer-versus-retraining contrast separates mechanism mismatch (coastal Guangdong) from portability (Guangxi), establishing the framework as a validated applicability screen.