Total: 1
Gravitational-wave standard sirens provide a direct measurement of luminosity distance and therefore offer a new way to test gravity over cosmological scales. We use this idea to forecast the sensitivity of the Einstein Telescope (ET) to Lorentz violation in Bumblebee gravity, and we examine how the forecast changes when Type~Ia supernova information is added. A timelike Bumblebee vacuum expectation value can affect the cosmic expansion and, when it evolves with redshift, the propagation amplitude of gravitational waves. We study a constant-field case and an evolving-field case using mock ET catalogues with $10^3$ events together with a Pantheon+-like supernova sample. The supernova data substantially improve the background parameters: in the constant-field case the uncertainties in $H_0$ and $Ω_m$ decrease by a factor of about $4.4$, while in the evolving-field case they decrease by factors of about $1.6$ and $6.2$, respectively. By contrast, the Lorentz-violating parameter $\ell_0$ remains prior dominated, and the evolution index $β$ is constrained only by the gravitational-wave sector. The best forecast precision, $Δ\ell_0\simeq0.028$, is about $4.7\times10^{12}$ times weaker than the bound implied by GW170817. The principal result is therefore a quantified sensitivity gap rather than a forecast detection. We also express the prediction in the phenomenological $(Ξ,n)$ description of modified gravitational-wave propagation, allowing direct comparison with standard-siren studies of other gravity models.