Total: 1
Bipartite A/B tests are experiments in which treatment is randomised over one set of units, while outcomes are measured on another. For example, an online marketplace may test a new pricing algorithm on a random subset of items, while the outcome of interest, say, purchase satisfaction, is measured on customers, each of whom interacts with many items. Existing methods for analysing bipartite experiments assume that every randomisation unit is assigned to treatment or control. In practice, often only a subset participates: platforms cap rollout risk, reserve holdout groups, and split their population across concurrent tests. Ignoring the unassigned units biases estimation, while including them requires care. We construct an unbiased linear estimator for bipartite experiments with partial assignment. Observations must be reweighted not only by the (centred) share of treated connections among participating ones (the exposure) but also by the number of participating connections, each inverse-weighted by its participation propensity, so that units whose connections are well covered carry proportionally more weight. The resulting estimator, EARL (Exposure- and Allocation-Reweighted Linear), is unbiased, consistent, and asymptotically normal; we devise two asymptotic variance estimators and show that it has minimal variance in a natural class of linear estimators. EARL remains unbiased regardless of the experience the unassigned units receive, as long as they contribute to expected outcomes additively; in particular, they can be allocated to other, non-overlapping tests. Our theory is complemented with a simulation study on two public datasets, in which EARL attains up to six times lower error than the strongest existing baseline and, in some configurations, over an order of magnitude lower than Horvitz-Thompson-style alternatives.