2026-05-15 | | Total: 8
We show that the low-energy states of non-Abelian topological orders possess extensive magic which is long-ranged, and cannot be eliminated by a constant-depth local unitary circuit. This refines conventional notions of complexity beyond the linear circuit depth which is required to prepare any topological phase, and provides a new resource-theoretic characterization of topological orders. A central technical result is a no-go theorem establishing that stabilizer states--even up to constant-depth local unitarie--cannot approximate low-energy states of non-Abelian string-net models which satisfy the entanglement bootstrap axioms. Moreover, we show that stabilizer-realizable Abelian string-net phases have mutual braiding phases quantized by the on-site qudit dimension, and that any violation of this condition necessarily implies extensive long-range magic. Extending to higher spatial dimensions, we argue that any state obeying an entanglement area law and hosting excitations with nontrivial fusion spaces must exhibit extensive long-range magic. This applies, in particular, to ground-states and low-energy states of higher-dimensional quantum double models.
Agents in social networks with threshold-based dynamics change opinions when influenced by sufficiently many peers. Existing literature typically assumes that the network structure and dynamics are fully known, which is often unrealistic. In this work, we ask how to learn a network structure from samples of the agents' synchronous opinion updates. Firstly, if the opinion dynamics follow a threshold rule in which a fixed number of influencers prevent opinion change (e.g., unanimity and quasi-unanimity), we provide an efficient PAC learning algorithm provided that the number of influencers per agent is bounded. Secondly, under standard computational complexity assumptions, we prove that if agents' opinions follow the majority of their influencers, then there is no efficient PAC learning algorithm. We propose a polynomial-time heuristic that successfully learns consistent networks in over $98\%$ of our simulations on random graphs, with no failures for some specified conditions on the numbers of agents and opinion diffusion examples.
Because CDCL produces proofs in the Resolution proof system, problems provably hard for Resolution are also provably hard for CDCL. Exponentially shorter proofs can sometimes be found using stronger proof systems such as $\text{Res}(\oplus)$, a generalization of Resolution to XNF formulas, whose constraints are disjunctions of parity equations ("linear clauses") such as $(x \oplus y) \lor \lnot (y \oplus z)$. While some modern solvers like CryptoMiniSAT reason on Boolean clauses with separate parity equations, reasoning about more general linear clauses is less explored. We present $\text{CDCL}(\oplus)$, a generalization of CDCL to XNF formulas, and prove a bidirectional connection with $\text{Res}(\oplus)$: $\text{CDCL}(\oplus)$ not only produces $\text{Res}(\oplus)$ proofs, but also polynomially simulates $\text{Res}(\oplus)$ given nondeterministic decisions and restarts, mirroring the classical relationship between CDCL and Resolution. Our key technical tool is a new set of inference rules for $\text{Res}(\oplus)$ that helps us translate Resolution-based subroutines such as 1-UIP clause learning. Altogether, $\text{CDCL}(\oplus)$'s parity reasoning includes branching on arbitrary parity equations, linear-algebraic reasoning during unit propagation, and learning linear clauses through conflict analysis. We provide a proof-of-concept implementation of $\text{CDCL}(\oplus)$ called Xorcle, which includes adaptations of existing CDCL heuristics to XNF formulas and an extension of LRUP proof logging that we call $\text{LRUP}(\oplus)$. On a selected suite of benchmarks focusing on native XNF formulas, Xorcle outperforms existing solvers such as Kissat and CryptoMiniSAT. Additionally, on Tseitin formulas written in CNF, even without preprocessing, Xorcle's running time appears to scale nearly polynomially.
Nested counter systems (NCS) are a generalization of counter systems to higher-order counters. Here, a higher-order counter is allowed to have other (lower-order) counters as elements, instead of just a number. Such systems can be viewed as working on trees, where the height of the tree naturally corresponds to the highest order counter that the system is working with. It is known that the coverability problem for NCS, which asks if a given final tree can be covered from a given initial tree, is $\mathbf{F}_{ε_0}$-complete. Here $\mathbf{F}_{ε_0}$ is a class in the fast-growing hierarchy of complexity classes. In this paper, we consider an extension of NCS called nested reset counter systems (NRCS) that extends NCS with resets. We show that coverability for NRCS over order-$k$ counters is $\mathbf{F}_{Ω_k}$-complete where $Ω_k$ is the tower of height $k$ of the $ω$ ordinal. This gives the first natural hierarchy of complete problems for all of these classes. Furthermore, to prove our upper bounds, we also develop length function theorems for any fixed amount of applications of the multiset operation on finite sets. As an application of our results, we improve existing upper bounds for various problems from XML processing, graph transformation systems, $π$-calculus, logic and parameterized verification. Furthermore, using our completeness results for $k$-NRCS, we also prove $\mathbf{F}_{Ω_k}$-completeness of the considered problems from the realms of parameterized verification and logic, for all $k$.
We study leaf-to-ancestor path-minimum queries on a rooted, weighted tree in the oracle model, where the only allowed value operation is a comparison oracle on edge (or node) weights. We give a static data structure that, after O(n log h) preprocessing time, space, and oracle calls (where $n$ is the number of nodes and $h$ is the tree height), answers any leaf-to-ancestor query in O(1) worst-case time with zero oracle calls at query time. The method combines (I) an edge-to-node weight conversion with a deterministic tie-break to obtain a total order; (II) ladder (longest-path) decomposition; (III) binary lifting; and (IV) sparse-table RMQ built over ladder arrays, storing indices selected via the oracle during preprocessing. We also show that the preprocessing oracle-comparison bound is tight in the deterministic comparison model.
In current Large Language Models we can trust the production of smoothly flowing prose on the basis of the principles of machine learning. However, there is no comparably principled basis to justify trust in the content of the text produced. It appears to be conventional wisdom that addressing this issue by adding more principled reasoning is not computationally affordable. Here we propose a principled method of reasoning that is efficient enough to be practical for large language models. Further, the method allows the retention of much of the currently used software and hardware base. Our method for improving the functioning of large language models consists of a first stage of preprocessing that recodes the data to a Unary Relational Integracode that is more explicit about the relationships among the objects described in the text, followed as a second stage by a standard but possibly streamlined machine learning process that then also learns to predict these relationships. The method may be viewed as realizing a world model and applying beyond natural language, to vision and actions, for example, where the multiple properties of an object referred to in an input are brought together explicitly, rather than remaining distributed in the various references to it in the input. We articulate its advantages in terms of Robust Logic, a system for performing principled chaining on learned, and hence uncertain, information. We show that this recoding has the surprising and fortuitous property that, while succinct, it makes the task of learning a core subset of relational rules that hold in the world described in the training data polynomial time learnable in a defined sense, the polynomial depending on the complexity of the rule. This gives support for sound reasoning within each single call of the learned classifier as well as between multiple calls.
Non-redundancy, introduced by Bessiere, Carbonnel, and Katsirelos (AAAI 2020), is a structural parameter for Constraint Satisfaction Problems ($\mathsf{CSPs}$) that governs kernelization, exact and approximate sparsification, and exact streaming complexity. It is the largest size of a $\mathsf{CSP}$ instance admitting no smaller subinstance with the same satisfying assignments. We study non-redundancy $\mathsf{NRD}_n(R)$ for Boolean symmetric $\mathsf{CSPs}$ defined by an $r$-ary relation $R$ whose value depends only on Hamming weight. An instance of $\mathsf{CSP}(R)$ has $n$ variables and constraints given by $r$-tuples; a constraint is satisfied exactly when the induced tuple lies in $R$. This class includes natural predicates such as cuts and $k$-SAT clauses. Our main result is a near-complete classification of the asymptotic growth of $\mathsf{NRD}_n(R)$ for symmetric Boolean predicates of arity at most $5$. Using computational experiments and algebraic upper- and lower-bound criteria, we resolve every predicate of arity at most $4$ and all but two predicates of arity $5$. For upper bounds, we introduce $t$-balancedness, a lifted, higher-degree version of the balancedness notion of Chen, Jansen, and Pieterse (Algorithmica 2020). We prove that $t$-balancedness is equivalent to the existence of degree-$t$ multilinear polynomials capturing $R$, and hence implies $\mathsf{NRD}_n(R)=O(n^t)$. For lower bounds, we use Carbonnel's (CP 2022) framework: predicates admitting a special reduction from $k$-ary OR inherit OR's lower bound $Ω(n^k)$. The only unresolved arity-$5$ predicates in our framework have bounds $Ω(n^2)$ and $O(n^3)$; we reduce their exact classification to natural extremal set-system questions.
In Correlation Clustering, the input is a graph $G=(V,E)$ with weight function $ω: {V \choose 2}\to Z$ and the task is to partition the vertex set into clusters such that the total weight of edges between clusters and missing edges inside clusters is minimized. Due to close connections between Correlation Clustering and Edge Multicut, deciding whether there is a partition with total cost at most $k$ is FPT with respect to $k$ but a polynomial kernel is presumably impossible. We study the influence of the structure of the fuzzy edge graph, that is, the graph induced by the weight-0 edges, on the problem complexity. We show in particular that Correlation Clustering admits a polynomial problem kernel when parameterized by $k+d$, where $d$ is the degeneracy of the fuzzy edge graph, and when parameterized by $k+c$, where $c$ is the closure of the fuzzy edge graph. We complement these positive results by showing hardness for several settings where the graph induced by the edges and nonedges has very restricted structure.