Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 | Total: 4

An st-shortest path, or st-path for short, in a graph G is a shortest (induced) path from s to t in G. Two st-paths are said to be adjacent if they differ on exactly one vertex. A reconfiguration sequence between two st-paths P and Q is a sequence of adjacent st-paths starting from P and ending at Q. Deciding whether there exists a reconfiguration sequence between two given $st$-paths is known to be PSPACE-complete, even on restricted classes of graphs such as graphs of bounded bandwidth (hence pathwidth). On the positive side, and rather surprisingly, the problem is polynomial-time solvable on planar graphs. In this paper, we study the parameterized complexity of the Shortest Path Reconfiguration (SPR) problem. We show that SPR is W[1]-hard parameterized by k + \ell, even when restricted to graphs of bounded (constant) degeneracy; here k denotes the number of edges on an st-path, and \ell denotes the length of a reconfiguration sequence from P to Q. We complement our hardness result by establishing the fixed-parameter tractability of SPR parameterized by \ell and restricted to nowhere-dense classes of graphs. Additionally, we establish fixed-parameter tractability of SPR when parameterized by the treedepth, by the cluster-deletion number, or by the modular-width of the input graph.

Assembly theory (AT) quantifies selection using the assembly equation and identifies complex objects that occur in abundance based on two measurements, assembly index and copy number. The assembly index is determined by the minimal number of recursive joining operations necessary to construct an object from basic parts, and the copy number is how many of the given object(s) are observed. Together these allow defining a quantity, called Assembly, which captures the amount of causation required to produce the observed objects in the sample. AT's focus on how selection generates complexity offers a distinct approach to that of computational complexity theory which focuses on minimum descriptions via compressibility. To explore formal differences between the two approaches, we show several simple and explicit mathematical examples demonstrating that the assembly index, itself only one piece of the theoretical framework of AT, is formally not equivalent to other commonly used complexity measures from computer science and information theory including Huffman encoding and Lempel-Ziv-Welch compression.

Let F_2 denote the free group of rank 2. Our main technical result of independent interest is: for any element u of F_2, there is g in F_2 such that no cyclically reduced image of u under an automorphism of F_2 contains g as a subword. We then address computational complexity of the following version of the Whitehead automorphism problem: given a fixed u in F_2, decide, on an input v in F_2 of length n, whether or not v is an automorphic image of u. We show that there is an algorithm that solves this problem and has constant (i.e., independent of n) average-case complexity.

We study the streaming complexity of $k$-counter approximate counting. In the $k$-counter approximate counting problem, we are given an input string in $[k]^n$, and we are required to approximate the number of each $j$'s ($j\in[k]$) in the string. Typically we require an additive error $\leq\frac{n}{3(k-1)}$ for each $j\in[k]$ respectively, and we are mostly interested in the regime $n\gg k$. We prove a lower bound result that the deterministic and worst-case $k$-counter approximate counting problem requires $\Omega(k\log(n/k))$ bits of space in the streaming model, while no non-trivial lower bounds were known before. In contrast, trivially counting the number of each $j\in[k]$ uses $O(k\log n)$ bits of space. Our main proof technique is analyzing a novel potential function. Our lower bound for $k$-counter approximate counting also implies the optimality of some other streaming algorithms. For example, we show that the celebrated Misra-Gries algorithm for heavy hitters [MG82] has achieved optimal space usage.