2024-11-06 | | Total: 5

I consider treatment-effect estimation with a panel data with two periods, using a first difference regression of the outcome evolution $\Delta Y_g$ on the treatment evolution $\Delta D_g$. A design-based justification of this estimator assumes that $\Delta D_g$ is as good as randomly assigned. This note shows that if one posits a causal model in levels between the treatment and the outcome, then $\Delta D_g$ randomly assigned implies that $\Delta D_g$ is independent of $D_{g,1}$. This is a very strong, fully testable condition. If $\Delta D_g$ is not independent of $D_{g,1}$, the first-difference estimator can still identify a convex combination of effects if $\Delta D_g$ is randomly assigned and treatment effects do not change over time, or if the the treatment path $(D_{g,1},D_{g,2})$ is randomly assigned and either of the following conditions hold: i) $D_{g,1}$ and $D_{g,2}$ are binary; ii) $D_{g,1}$ and $D_{g,2}$ have the same variance; iii) $D_{g,1}$ and $D_{g,2}$ are uncorrelated or negatively correlated. I use these results to revisit Acemoglu et al (2016).

We introduce a new identification strategy for uncertainty shocks to explain macroeconomic volatility in financial markets. The Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index (VIX) measures market expectations of future volatility, but traditional methods based on second-moment shocks and time-varying volatility of the VIX often fail to capture the non-Gaussian, heavy-tailed nature of asset returns. To address this, we construct a revised VIX by fitting a double-subordinated Normal Inverse Gaussian Levy process to S&P 500 option prices, providing a more comprehensive measure of volatility that reflects the extreme movements and heavy tails observed in financial data. Using an axiomatic approach, we introduce a general family of risk-reward ratios, computed with our revised VIX and fitted over a fractional time series to more accurately identify uncertainty shocks in financial markets.

We examine the challenges in ranking multiple treatments based on their estimated effects when using linear regression or its popular double-machine-learning variant, the Partially Linear Model (PLM), in the presence of treatment effect heterogeneity. We demonstrate by example that overlap-weighting performed by linear models like PLM can produce Weighted Average Treatment Effects (WATE) that have rankings that are inconsistent with the rankings of the underlying Average Treatment Effects (ATE). We define this as ranking reversals and derive a necessary and sufficient condition for ranking reversals under the PLM. We conclude with several simulation studies conditions under which ranking reversals occur.

A large differentiated oligopoly yields inefficient market equilibria. An authority with imprecise information about the primitives of the market aims to design tax/subsidy interventions that increase efficiency robustly, i.e., with high probability. We identify a condition on demand that guarantees the existence of such interventions, and we show how to construct them using noisy estimates of demand complementarities and substitutabilities across products. The analysis works by deriving a novel description of the incidence of market interventions in terms of spectral statistics of a Slutsky matrix. Our notion of recoverable structure ensures that parts of the spectrum that are useful for the design of interventions are statistically recoverable from noisy demand estimates.

The techniques suggested in Frühwirth-Schnatter et al. (2024) concern sparsity and factor selection and have enormous potential beyond standard factor analysis applications. We show how these techniques can be applied to Latent Space (LS) models for network data. These models suffer from well-known identification issues of the latent factors due to likelihood invariance to factor translation, reflection, and rotation (see Hoff et al., 2002). A set of observables can be instrumental in identifying the latent factors via auxiliary equations (see Liu et al., 2021). These, in turn, share many analogies with the equations used in factor modeling, and we argue that the factor loading restrictions may be beneficial for achieving identification.