2026-05-29 | | Total: 2
Several scholars have accorded the Tychonic System a prominent place, considering it a credible alternative to the Ptolemaic and Copernican systems. In recent years, there have even been some enthusiastic contributions in support of Brahe, which have sought to show how his solutions were the most suitable for providing scientifics support to the new observations that were accumulating between the late 16th century and the mid-17th century. In this work, after analyzing these contributions, I proceed to demonstrate that the Tychonic system had so many critical points, many of which have not been adequately noted by historical criticism, that it did not deserve all the attention it received, neither at the time of its publication, nor in Galileo's time, nor in subsequent periods, because it never constituted a truly credible alternative, and that its reputation as the "third system of the world" is entirely undeserved.
The notion of rigour relevant to the practice of physics is an endogenous one. Theoretical physics has its own internal norms about mathematical practice and notions of legitimate derivations or formal objects. These norms are often implicit, local, and change in substantial ways over time. Moreover, norms of rigour in theoretical physics, at least in the mid-twentieth century, are primarily focused on the goal of removing barriers for concrete calculation and clear conceptualisation. Rather than pursuit of rigour for its own sake, or to achieve some `higher' standard of truth, theoretical physicists seek to `rigorise' initial, semi-formal constructions in order to render formally well-defined models with which they can make concrete contact with the world, through calculations of quantities of interest. In what follows we will support this thesis based upon a detailed historical case study of the development of and attribution of credit for the Wheeler-DeWitt equation in the period 1962-67. Drawing upon archival material and the published record we develop and defend the explanatory hypothesis that it was the rigorisation of the equation via the expression for the inner product that was the crucial step in the work of Wheeler and DeWitt rather than the statement of the equation itself.