2026-08-20 | | Total: 7
Stefan Bergman worked in the field of pure and applied mathematics and became known primarily for his work on complex analysis of several variables. He studied the theory of solutions to linear partial differential equations via integral operators and introduced the concept of the Bergmann kernel function. He also worked on problems in electrical engineering, the theory of elasticity, potential theory, and hydrodynamics, particularly supersonic flows. His academic career in Germany was cut short by the Nazi purge, leading to a peripatetic exile through the USSR and France before finally establishing a distinguished career in the United States, notably at Harvard and Stanford. The paper sketches his biography based on archival sources and complements a bibliography of his writings compiled by M.Skwarczy'nski in 1981 with a number of references primarily from his early career.
This work provides an introduction to the most influential hidden-variable interpretation of the quantum formalism, i.e., the de Broglie-Bohm pilot-wave theory. As the reader will see, the chapter offers a detailed discussion of the main formulations of the theory. Moreover, cogent topics such as the origin of the Born rule, the interpretation of probability, the nature of the wave function, the status of spin, as well as extensions of the pilot-wave approach beyond non-relativistic quantum mechanics will be examined. This essay, however, not only reviews existing relevant literature but also contributes new insights about (i) the existence of spin in the context of pilot-wave theory, and (ii) whether the latter framework is formally and conceptually simpler than standard quantum mechanics.
John Ellard Gore (1845-1910) was an Irish amateur astronomer, prolific science writer and civil engineer. He was an inaugural member of the British Astronomical Association when it was founded in 1890 and was invited to become the first Director of its Variable Star Section. Through careful reasoning, Gore reached remarkably modern conclusions about the nature of stars, including their sizes, distances and luminosities. This paper explores whether he might have been able to produce an early form of what is now known as the Hertzsprung-Russell (H-R) diagram.
The discovery of radar echoes from meteor trains at Jodrell Bank in December 1945 heralded the beginning of a new era in meteor astronomy. This paper examines the early collaboration between Bernard Lovell, whose expertise in radar and physics transformed wartime technology into a new astronomical technique, and J. P. Manning Prentice, Director of the British Astronomical Association Meteor Section, whose knowledge of visual meteor observation proved essential to interpreting the discoveries. Drawing on previously unpublished correspondence from the Lovell Archive at the University of Manchester, the paper traces the development of their partnership, including the pioneering 1946 Perseid and Giacobinid observations, the contribution of BAA observers, and the establishment of radar meteor research at Jodrell Bank. It reveals how complementary professional and amateur expertise combined to create a new field of astronomy and a lasting scientific friendship.
It is sometimes said that a reason to prefer Everettian quantum mechanics is that it allows one to avoid the kind of spooky action at a distance that is a consequence of quantum entanglement according to other approaches. There is a straightforward argument to show EQM has this virtue, however some advocates argue that this requires we see branching as a local causal process. I explain this reasoning and then show why, given the way Everettians standardly conceive of worlds and branching as emergent phenomena, branching need not be viewed as a causal process for EQM to be relativistically local. Forthcoming in Local Quantum Mechanics, OUP 2026.
We present a simple geometric proof of Kepler's first law. The core of the argument rests on a kinematic invariant that we call the velocity projection ratio - the ratio between the radial projection of the velocity and its projection onto a fixed direction parallel to the periapsis line. We show that the constancy of this ratio is an immediate consequence of Newton's laws, and that it leads directly to the focus-directrix property of the orbit. By establishing a direct link between planetary dynamics and the classical geometric definition of conics, our proof reveals the conic nature of the orbit as an inevitable consequence of the inverse-square law.
This doctoral dissertation on the foundations of quantum theory isolates and then formalizes a physically relevant concept that I have called "Epistemic Constraint." Here, epistemic constraints are the definite, intersubjectively agreeable, ordinary-language conditions under which experiments are described. The usual formulation of the quantum measurement problem, which I call the Schrodingerian measurement problem, has the structure of an anomaly: if we take quantum theory at face value, we expect no definite values, and yet we see definite values in experiments. The responses to this problem have been either to solve it or to dissolve it. These responses, which have taken the form of interpretation, modification, or reconstruction of quantum mechanics, seek either to derive (conceptually or mathematically) epistemic constraints from within quantum mechanics or suitable modifications of it, as is the case with certain interpretations and modifications, or to posit the epistemic constraint, or parts of it, as a primitive assumption with the goal of deriving quantum mechanics, as is the case in some reconstruction programs. In contrast to the Schrodingerian measurement problem, which had the structure of an anomaly, this dissertation develops the Bohrian Program, which (for lack of a better comparison) has a structure similar to the problem historically associated with Euclid's fifth postulate. It seeks to keep epistemic constraints as primitive in an onto-epistemic sense. It then seeks new physical conclusions from the joint consideration of quantum mechanics and epistemic constraints, without seeking to derive one from the other. Among other results, this leads to a notion of the probability of instantiability of the Born Rule that specifies when to apply the Born Rule and when to apply a unitary transformation to a quantum state.