2026-07-17 | | Total: 2
In 2019, the first image of a black hole's shadow based on observation was released by the Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration (EHT). This paper shows that despite the EHT's emphasis on a single image as its final result, there were countless plausible ways of rendering the data, among which researchers could not easily choose. To obtain a single image from the extremely noisy and sparse data, it was necessary to select one of multiple plausible approaches, or to average the results from different approaches, at each stage of data processing. We examine the epistemic and aesthetic choices involved at various stages, and explore what the images would have looked like if the EHT had made different choices. We suggest that the most valuable evidence produced by the EHT comes not from the single image it ultimately advertised as its central result, but from the demonstration of the limited variability that emerged from the specific choices made.
Amazonian earthworks, also called geoglyphs, are thousands of man-made earthen structures, mostly of geometrical shape, which progressively emerged from the tropical forest due to progressive deforestation. They were probably built between the fifth century BC and the end of the first millennium AD, but archaeological investigation on the culture of their builders is yet at the beginning. Nevertheless, a ceremonial rather than practical function seems likely, at least for those having a very regular shape. In the present paper, simple remote-sensing technique, combined with the methodological approach of modern Archaeoastronomy, are applied to study for the first time their orientation. The analysis takes in consideration virtually all known squared and rectangular structures for a total of 326 earthworks. The results show without doubts a non-random choice for their orientation and a clear interest of their builders for the annual cycle of the Sun.