2026-08-12 | | Total: 10
We propose a comprehensive framework for solving overlapping-generations (OLG) models in continuous time with both idiosyncratic and aggregate risk. Our general characterization of equilibrium through the master equation operates on the joint distribution over the continuous idiosyncratic states, age and wealth. Our computational strategy is to take a finite-dimensional representation of this distribution as an input of a neural net which in turn outputs a finite-difference representation of the (conditional) value function. This idea can be applied generally to heterogeneous agent models with aggregate risk, and we call it finite-difference neural operator. Our method combines advantages from modern neural nets and traditional finite-difference methods: It is grid-free in the high-dimensional distribution, and retains control on boundary conditions in low-dimensional state variables. Moreover, our method is able to enforce shape constraints. We showcase its flexibility by solving a continuous-time OLG model with aggregate risk alone where we characterize the distribution by its supporting function; and to an OLG model with both types of risk.
Thousands of SOFR derivatives are available in exchanges and OTC, but the market remains illiquid and incomplete. Such a market is beyond the scope of classic risk-neutral approaches that imply linear pricing rules and, at best, approximate hedging strategies whose hedging error may be difficult to quantify. This paper develops an indifference pricing model which is consistent with observed derivative quotes, the agent's financial position and views about the uncertain future as well as risk preferences as described by a convex risk measure. In addition to prices and hedging strategies, the model gives an explicit description of the hedging error and the associated risk. The approach is illustrated numerically using hundreds of CME-listed derivatives to price and hedge unreplicable OTC SOFR derivatives. The indifference prices are computed in less than a minute on a regular PC. We find that the optimal hedging portfolios tend to be sparse but still provide good approximations of the derivative payouts.
Our primary goal is to forecast and empirically examine the evolution of the implied volatility (IV) surface, with particular focus on the dates of scheduled meetings of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). Firstly, we check if IV increases before the announcement and if thes effect is stronger for short-dated, out-the-money (OTM) options in high volatility regimes. In the second part, we turn the focus to verifying if the ML framework can beat the benchmark random walk in forecasting this effect. A feature related to dates of scheduled FOMC meetings augments the model, which allows us to discover if it can learn the effect of elevated pre-announcement uncertainty. Our contribution relies mainly on the quantitative prediction of the pre-announcement effect and the inclusion of exogenous information inside the ML framework used for the IV surface forecasting. It is also on of the first attempts to apply ML models directly on the IV surface without relying on dimensionality reduction. To achieve this, we employ a convolutional two-dimensional LSTM model, which is capable of learning spatio-temporal signals in the surface. Our analysis reveals that the edge of the ML framework can be limited due to the noisy characteristics of the IV surface. Nevertheless, our study reinforces the perspective that ML models can effectively forecast the IV surface also during abnormal days.
The New Keynesian example of Beraja (2023) is not identified at its printed calibration: more than one structure satisfies every condition of its identification step. Two of the paper's six identifying restrictions coincide on equilibrium equations consistent with the printed reduced form, leaving eleven conditions to determine an equation's twelve coefficients. The note derives the rank condition the identification step requires, computable from the reduced form and the restrictions alone. The note also documents and corrects a misprint in the paper's counterfactual display. A one-clause amendment to the paper's Theorem 1 restores its conclusion.
Automated quantitative research has made striking progress, yet each system answers the same question: which strategy scores highest on a scalar metric? We argue this question is incomplete. Professional investors do not order "the highest return"; they order an identity--pure stock-selection alpha uncontaminated by style exposure, resilient in unilateral market declines, within turnover and capacity budgets. We call the incumbent paradigm result-oriented and propose Objective-Oriented Quantitative Investment (OOQI): a specification-driven framework in which (i) the full strategy pipeline is modeled as a typed design space of interchangeable modules with explicit interface contracts (8.85 x 10^8 assemblies in our reference instantiation); (ii) investor intent is formalized as a strategy profile specification--a composable language of measurable, falsifiable clauses from eight requirement families, with hard/soft semantics and an interaction algebra; and (iii) a compiler translates specifications into constrained assemblies and verifies satisfaction clause-by-clause. Because search over large assembly spaces inflates apparent satisfaction, we develop a verification protocol treating the satisfaction rate itself as a statistical object, subject to deflation for search width, temporal holdout, and random-assembly null models. A synthetic demonstration with 32 pipeline assemblies shows that result-oriented selection attains the top in-sample information ratio while satisfying only 25% of the specification, whereas specification-driven selection satisfies 100% of it at a 5.5% score cost. The accompanying theory shows satisfaction-driven synthesis is NP-hard in general yet constant-factor approximable in a conflict-free regime; specifications form a lattice dual to assemblies; each clause carries a Lagrangian shadow price; and rolling re-certification is anytime-valid via e-processes.
We calibrate credit default swaps and index tranches with elastically stopped Lévy processes: each firm defaults when the running supremum of a latent, spectrally positive distress process crosses an independent exponential barrier. This yields a Cox construction with totally inaccessible default times, while retaining the interpretability and explicit formulas of a structural approach. Adding a single common compound Poisson jump factor to every firm's latent driver gives a parsimonious multi-credit model with simultaneous defaults, which is priced by an exact Wiener--Hopf Monte Carlo scheme. Its tractability rests on a single-name result we prove: a finite partial-fraction formula for the Laplace transform of the default probability under phase-type jumps. On daily CDX North American High-Yield and Investment-Grade panels, our drivers attain the lowest out-of-sample errors in a six-model field and reproduce the inverted spread curves of names heading into default, which a Lévy subordinator provably does not. At the index level, the two-parameter dependence structure closes $73\%$ to $89\%$ of the tranche pricing gap left by independent marginals with the dependence parameters frozen, and up to $95\%$ once re-marked to tranche quotes; our framework dominates a single-factor Gaussian copula and the affine intensity benchmark of Duffie--Gârleanu on both indices.
This study investigates whether the macroscopic statistical maturity of cryptocurrencies implies dynamical equivalence with traditional equity markets. We analyze high-frequency data (2020--2025) using the Complexity--Entropy Causality Plane (CECP) and directed horizontal visibility graphs (directed HVG) to uncover complex temporal patterns and time-directed structures in the return series. While conventional stylized facts show striking convergence across all assets, structural diagnostics reveal a compelling paradox: cryptocurrencies appear more locally random than the equity benchmark during ordinary periods, yet exhibit significantly stronger directional time-irreversibility around high-visibility return events. The absolute-return results show that large cryptocurrency fluctuations tend to begin abruptly and remain elevated afterward. Separate analyses of positive returns and negative-return magnitudes show that this pattern is shared across cryptocurrencies on the upside but varies across assets on the downside. We conclude that statistical maturity is only skin-deep; the underlying dynamical processes of mature cryptocurrencies remain fundamentally distinct from traditional benchmarks.
The Triadic Stress Index (TSI) takes a network index whose four factors were first observed in soil microbiome co-occurrence networks and applies it, without alteration, to the correlation network of financial assets. We test it on five markets spanning 2006-2026 (equities including banking crises and the AI sector, cryptocurrencies, commodities, foreign exchange and sovereign debt), against three independent definitions of a crisis episode, at a fixed alarm budget, out of sample, with block-bootstrap intervals and a Holm correction across the family of tests. The benchmarks are the Absorption Ratio, the industry standard used by MSCI and central banks; the effective rank and the Vendi score, the sharpest spectral measures available; Ollivier-Ricci curvature; and the global and local balance indices of signed correlation networks. Three comparisons favour the index. It carries a per-node decomposition, diag(A^3), naming which asset is carrying the concentration with no parameter to select, and scores 0.97-0.99 against 0.33-0.84 for the only published per-node alternative, whereas spectral attribution must first choose how many components to read and collapses under a standard but wrong choice. Its alarms are the cleanest of anything tested, 4.0% of them with no matching episode against 14.7% for the effective rank and roughly 59% for the Absorption Ratio. And it beats the Absorption Ratio on detection by 0.273 in F1 out of sample, p<0.0005. The remaining comparisons are ties. Against the effective rank and the Vendi score the index ties in every scheme and both samples, and the margin over the Absorption Ratio narrows under the strictest labelling. On real matrices the far simpler node degree reproduces the attribution. A lead-lag analysis puts the peak cross-correlation at zero lag: this is a coincident state index, not a forecast.
The integration of weather-dependent renewable generation increases the volatility of residual demand and raises the value of dispatchable low-carbon flexibility. This paper studies the optimal operation of a load-following nuclear power plant owned by a producer that must balance stochastic residual demand while accounting for ramping limits and costly changes in operating regimes. Nuclear output can be increased, decreased, or kept constant, and the production decision is formulated as a finite-horizon optimal switching problem. We analyze both a closed-economy benchmark, where excess production cannot be sold and shortages require costly back-up generation, and an open-economy setting, where the producer can trade electricity at prices driven by aggregate market residual demand. The value functions are characterized as viscosity solutions of a system of Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman quasi-variational inequalities, and optimal policies are computed using a monotone semi-Lagrangian scheme. The numerical results show how shortage costs, switching costs, ramping capability, and market access shape optimal nuclear load following. The analysis highlights the economic value of controllable low-carbon capacity in renewable-intensive systems and provides implications for flexibility remuneration, balancing-market design, and interconnection policy.
A new class of software systems is transforming investment analysis. Large language model agents assembled into collaborative team structures including analysts, researchers, and risk managers are increasingly deployed across financial markets. Yet current multi-agent frameworks share a critical limitation: they rely on the foundational assumption that companies can be valued through traditional cash flows. This paradigm fails in clinical-stage biotechnology, where enterprise value depends entirely on binary scientific and regulatory milestones. To bridge this gap, this paper introduces a specialized multi-agent framework. Its valuation layer translates qualitative scientific judgment into defensible valuations for pre-revenue assets; its cross-market coordination layer reconciles pricing across international venues simultaneously; and its conflict-fusion mechanism systematically arbitrates between bullish scientific conviction and cautious regulatory constraints in a domain-specific manner. Crucially, the architecture is not a speculative design: it encodes a method the author first executed by hand as sole portfolio manager of China's first dedicated cross-border biotechnology fund, a human practice that returned 127.17% against a 50.67% benchmark within sixteen months. That record is evidence for the underlying method rather than for any AI system; no implementation is evaluated here. This paper presents the framework at the architectural level, establishing foundational design principles for extending agentic investment systems into complex, event-driven asset classes they currently serve poorly.