2026-03-17 | | Total: 22
Given a reference risk measure, the risk budgeting is the portfolio where each asset contributes a predetermined amount to the total risk. We propose a novel approach, alternative to the ones proposed in the literature, for the calculation of the risk budgeting portfolio. This different perspective on the problem has several interesting consequences. For the calculation of the portfolio, we define a Cauchy sequence within the simplex of R^n, whose limit corresponds to the risk budgeting portfolio. This construction allows for the straightforward implementation of an efficient algorithm, avoiding the need to solve auxiliary, equivalent optimization problems, which may be computationally challenging and hard to interpret in the decision theory context. We compare our algorithm with the standard optimization-based methods proposed in the literature. From a theoretical point of view, starting from the Cauchy sequence, we define a function for which the risk budgeting portfolio is a fixed point. Therefore, sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of the fixed point can be used. The methodology is developed for general risk measures and implemented in detail in the case of standard deviation.
This work evaluates the impact of contagious cyber-events, over a finite horizon, on firms' financial health and on a cyber insurance portfolio. Our approach builds on key empirical findings from economics and cybersecurity. In economics, firm size and growth-rate distributions are non-Gaussian and exhibit heavy tails. In cybersecurity, contagion dynamics strongly depend on firm size and environmental conditions. To capture these features, we propose a stochastic multi-group SIR model coupled with a granular model of firm growth. This framework allows us to quantify the financial impact of cyber-attacks on firms' revenues and on the insurer's portfolio. In the model, the arrival time and duration of cyber-attacks are driven by a combination of a Cox process and a Bernoulli random variable. The Cox process represents external contagion, with an intensity given by the force of infection derived from the stochastic SIR dynamics. The Bernoulli component captures contagion originating from an infected sister or subsidiary firm. Environmental variability enables stochastic scenario generation and the computation of aggregate exceedance probabilities, a standard metric in catastrophe modeling that provides insurers with immediate insight into the financial severity of an event. We apply the framework to the LockBit ransomware attacks observed between May and July 2024. For a portfolio of 2,929 firms located in Ile-de-France, the model predicts that, with 50% probability, the insurer will need to compensate losses equivalent to up to two days of revenue over a 100-day cyber incident.
We develop at-the-money call-price and implied volatility asymptotic expansions in time to maturity for a class of asset-price models whose log returns follow a Lévy process. Under mild assumptions placing the driving Lévy process in the small-time domain of attraction of an $α$-stable law with $α\in (1,2)$, we give first-order at-the-money call-price and implied volatility asymptotics. A key observation is that both the stable domain of attraction and the finiteness of the centering constant $\barμ$ are preserved under the share measure transformation, so that all of the distributional input needed for the call-price expansion can be read off from the regular variation of the Lévy measure near the origin. When the Lévy process has no Brownian component, new rates of convergence of the form $t^{1/α} \ell(t)$ where $\ell$ is a slowly varying function are obtained. We provide an example of an exponential Lévy model exhibiting this behavior, with $\ell$ not asymptotically constant, yielding a convergence rate of $(t / \log(1/t))^{1/α}$. In the case of a Lévyprocess with Brownian component, we show that the jump contribution is always lower order, so that the leading $\sqrt{t}$ behavior of the at-the-money call price is universal and driven entirely by the Gaussian part of the characteristic triplet.
This paper introduces a new factor contributing to the decline in marriage and fertility: the growth of leisure technology. Over recent decades, high-income countries have experienced two notable shifts in household and family dynamics. First, there has been a significant decline in marriage rates and fertility. Second, time has increasingly been allocated to leisure activities. This paper presents a unified model of marriage and fertility, incorporating intra-household bargaining dynamics. The model, calibrated using data from Japan between 2019 and 2023, is employed to assess the impact of leisure technology growth on marriage and fertility during 2005-2009. The findings highlight that leisure technology growth makes single life relatively more appealing compared to marriage and parenthood. The model explains 21.1% of the decline in marriage and 73.1% of the decrease in fertility.
We study the problem of asset liquidation in financial systems. During financial crises, asset liquidation is often inevitable but can lead to substantial losses if a significant amount of illiquid assets are sold simultaneously at depressed prices -- a phenomenon known as price impact. To tackle this challenge, we consider a two-period liquidation model that allows for early liquidation prior to clearing, thereby mitigating price impact at clearing, and we develop a worst-case approach to solve the decision-making problem on the optimal size of early liquidation. Specifically, we propose a robust optimal strategy -- a tractable liquidation approach that maximizes the worst-case value of liquid assets at clearing, taking into account the uncertainty of other banks' early liquidation decisions. We derive a (semi-)closed-form representation of this strategy in a practical scenario involving permanent price impact and analyze its sensitivity to that impact's magnitude. We further identify its closed-form expression in another practical scenario featuring interbank exposures. Our findings, although built upon a stylized model, offer valuable guidelines for developing robust liquidation strategies that mitigate losses resulting from asset liquidation.
Private credit assets under management grew from \$158 billion in 2010 to nearly \$2 trillion globally by mid-2024, fundamentally reshaping corporate credit markets. This paper provides a systematic survey of the academic literature on private credit, organizing theory and evidence around four questions: why the market has grown so rapidly, how direct lender technology differs from bank lending, what risk-adjusted returns investors earn, and whether the sector poses systemic risks. We develop an integrated theoretical framework linking delegated monitoring, soft-information processing, and incomplete contracting to the institutional specifics of modern direct lending. The empirical evidence documents a distinctive lending technology serving opaque, private-equity-sponsored borrowers at a meaningful and persistent spread premium over the broadly syndicated loan market, while performance evidence suggests that risk-adjusted returns for the average fund are largely consumed by fees.
Trend-following strategies underpin many systematic trading approaches yet struggle under nonstationary and nonlinear market regimes. We propose an LSTM-based framework to forecast next-day trend differences ($Δ_t$) for the top 30 S\&P 500 equities, validated across market cycles (2005--2025). Key contributions include: (i) formal proof of bias-variance reduction via differencing, (ii) exhaustive empirical benchmarks against OLS, Ridge, and Lasso, (iii) portfolio simulations confirming economic gains in terms of overall PNL compared to other models like OLS, Ridge, Lasso or LightGBM Regressor
Short-horizon option book management relies on P&L expansions in a small set of risk factors. In practice, the quadratic term and common desk adjustments (smile corrections, execution cost add-ons) depend on the chosen factor coordinates, so predicted second-order P&L can change when moving between spot, forward, and log-forward parameterizations. We propose a local, model-agnostic framework that makes the quadratic term coordinate invariant. The usual Hessian is replaced by a covariant Hessian defined by an affine connection, yielding an invariant quadratic predictor. The connection is calibrated to match a desk target for quadratic P&L (Vanna-Volga for smile effects or, in principle, a local fit to realized P&L) while leaving first-order hedge Greeks unchanged. Execution frictions enter through a quadratic cost model for hedge trades. Combined with hedge ratios, this induces an equivalent quadratic penalty on factor moves, makes portfolio netting of costs explicit, and provides local liquidity-aware second-order sensitivities and rebalancing directions. Calibration reduces to small linear systems with clear identifiability conditions. Two FX barrier case studies (EURUSD, USDTRY) illustrate the workflow, and we briefly sketch extensions to other quadratic penalties (risk normalization, scenario/gap terms, and xVA/capital add-ons).
This paper develops an autonomous framework for systematic factor investing via agentic AI. Rather than relying on sequential manual prompts, our approach operationalizes the model as a self-directed engine that endogenously formulates interpretable trading signals. To mitigate data snooping biases, this closed-loop system imposes strict empirical discipline through out-of-sample validation and economic rationale requirements. Applying this methodology to the U.S. equity market, we document that long-short portfolios formed on the simple linear combination of signals deliver an annualized Sharpe ratio of 3.11 and a return of 59.53%. Finally, our empirics demonstrate that self-evolving AI offers a scalable and interpretable paradigm.
How do entrepreneurs act on their beliefs when probabilities of outcomes are unknown but subjectively perceived? We theorize that two distinct dimensions of ambiguity attitudes influence entrepreneurial action: ambiguity aversion - the unwillingness to bear ambiguity - and ambiguity sensitivity - how individuals discriminate between different levels of perceived chances of success. The second dimension determines how much entrepreneurs adjust their actions based on new information - a distinct aspect that cannot be captured by ambiguity aversion alone. Our theory suggests that entrepreneurs with different growth orientations have different ambiguity attitudes as compared to employees. Using incentivized measures from a large-scale survey, we find that incorporated entrepreneurs exhibit lower ambiguity aversion than employees, indicating that they are more willing to act under ambiguity. Distinctively, unincorporated self-employed individuals show higher ambiguity sensitivity, indicating that their actions are more responsive to changes in their beliefs. These patterns persist after controlling for risk attitudes, optimism, cognitive ability, and demographics. Our results highlight the distinct impacts of ambiguity aversion and ambiguity sensitivity on entrepreneurial actions.
Childhood socioeconomic disadvantage is a well established determinant of health in later life. Less is known about how early-life deprivation unfolds when individuals experience major institutional transformation and migration in adulthood. Cohorts socialized under Soviet institutions provide a useful setting to examine life-course divergence under systemic change. This study uses harmonized data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) on older adults residing in Estonia, Latvia, and Israel to examine the association between retrospectively reported childhood deprivation and multiple health outcomes in later life, including poor self-rated health, chronic disease burden, functional limitation, depression, and a composite multifrailty indicator. Logistic regression models and predicted probabilities assess whether childhood deprivation predicts late-life health across different adult institutional contexts and whether associations vary by linguistic affiliation. Higher levels of childhood deprivation are consistently associated with poorer health outcomes across all three countries. Individuals in the highest deprivation quintile show substantially higher odds of adverse health outcomes, including multifrailty. Stratified analyses for Estonia and Latvia indicate broadly similar deprivation-health gradients among national-language and Russian-speaking populations. These findings highlight the persistence of childhood disadvantage and the importance of early-life conditions in shaping health inequalities in ageing populations exposed to systemic transformation.
We address the attribution problem for apparent slow collective dynamics: is the observed persistence intrinsic, or inherited from a persistent driver? For the leading eigenvalue fraction $ψ_1=λ_{\max}/N$ of S\&P 500 60-day rolling correlation matrices ($237$ stocks, 2004--2023), a VIX-coupled Ornstein--Uhlenbeck model reduces the effective relaxation time from $298$ to $61$ trading days and improves the fit over bare mean reversion by $Δ$BIC$=109$. On the decomposition sample, an informational residual of $\log(\mathrm{VIX})$ alone retains most of that gain ($Δ$BIC$=78.6$), whereas a mechanical VIX proxy alone does not improve the fit. Autocorrelation-matched placebo fields fail ($Δ$BIC$_{\max}=2.7$), disjoint weekly reconstructions still favor the field-coupled model ($Δ$BIC$=140$--$151$), and six anchored chronological holdouts preserve the out-of-sample advantage. Quiet-regime and field-stripped residual autocorrelation controls show the same collapse of persistence. Stronger hidden-variable extensions remain only partially supported. Within the tested stochastic class, conditioning on the observed VIX proxy absorbs most of the apparent slow dynamics.
Whenever dealing with horizons of different times scales, risk evaluation of losses may incur in both interest rate uncertainty and horizon risk as introduced in [11]. With the goal to capture both effects, we work with cash subadditive fully-dynamic risk measures. In this work we consider such measures obtained via the BSDE and the shortfall approaches. We stress that we consider BSDEs both with Lipschitz and quadratic drivers. We then introduce the hq-entropic risk measure on losses as an effective example of fully-dynamic risk measure serving the scope. Shortfall risk measures are extended to capture cash non-additivity. For our newly introduced h-generalized shortfall risk measures we provide a dual representation and we connect them to fully-dynamic certainty equivalent. To conclude, we can see that the hq-entropic risk measures on losses belong to the family h-generalized shortfall, but they are not of certainty equivalent type. We note that the classical entropic risk measure, besides being generated by a BSDE, is also both a shortfall and a certainty equivalent.
Recent advances in large language models, tool-using agents, and financial machine learning are shifting financial automation from isolated prediction tasks to integrated decision systems that can perceive information, reason over objectives, and generate or execute actions. This paper develops an integrative framework for analysing agentic finance: financial market environments in which autonomous or semi-autonomous AI systems participate in information processing, decision support, monitoring, and execution workflows. The analysis proceeds in three steps. First, the paper proposes a four-layer architecture of financial AI agents covering data perception, reasoning engines, strategy generation, and execution with control. Second, it introduces the Agentic Financial Market Model (AFMM), a stylised agent-based representation linking agent design parameters such as autonomy depth, heterogeneity, execution coupling, infrastructure concentration, and supervisory observability to market-level outcomes including efficiency, liquidity resilience, volatility, and systemic risk. Third, it develops an illustrative empirical application based on event studies of AI-agent capability disclosures and heterogeneous market repricing. The central argument is that the systemic implications of AI in finance depend less on model intelligence alone than on how agent architectures are distributed, coupled, and governed across institutions. In the near term, the most plausible equilibrium is bounded autonomy, in which AI agents operate as supervised co-pilots, monitoring systems, and constrained execution modules embedded within human decision processes.
We introduce a performance-driven framework for constructing strictly causal forward-oriented observables in strongly non-stationary time series. The method combines a robustly normalized composite of heterogeneous indicators with a causally computed derivative component, yielding a local phase-leading effect that is amplified near regime transitions while remaining fully causal. A hysteresis-based decision functional maps the observable into discrete system states, with execution delayed by one step to preserve strict temporal ordering. Adaptation is achieved through a walk-forward scheme, in which model parameters are selected using rolling train--validation windows and subsequently applied out-of-sample. In this setting, the validation segment acts as an internal performance screen rather than as a statistical validation set, and no claims of generalization are inferred from it alone. The framework is evaluated on high-frequency financial time series as an experimentally accessible realization of a non-stationary complex system. Under a controlled zero-cost setting, the resulting dynamics exhibit a pronounced risk-reshaping effect, characterized by smoother trajectories and reduced drawdowns relative to direct exposure, and should be interpreted as an upper bound on achievable performance. These results illustrate how causal signal engineering can generate anticipatory structure in non-stationary systems without relying on non-causal information, explicit horizon labeling, or high-capacity predictive models.
We investigate the performance of the Kelly rule in a setting in which the dynamics of the return is represented by a time change process. We find that in this general semi-martingale setting the Kelly rule does not maximize the average growth rate, unless the log-return is normally distributed. Namely, the investment position proposed by the Kelly rule is too large, and the investor could achieve a higher average growth rate by investing less aggressively. The higher the variance of the stochastic clock, the more material the failure of the Kelly rule. The ruin threshold proposed by Thorp (1969) is closer, even though examples based on stochastic clock variance estimates taken from the literature show that Kelly rule investment remains safely in the ruin-free region. Finally, the goal of keeping the investment below the ruin threshold for a family of stochastic clock distributions generates a long term investment problem that parallels the "acceptable investment" theory.
Despite the scale of capital being deployed toward AI initiatives, no empirical framework currently exists for benchmarking where a firm stands relative to competitors in AI readiness and deployment, or for translating that position into auditable financial outcomes. In practice, private equity deal teams, management consultants, and corporate strategists have relied on qualitative judgment and ad-hoc maturity labels; tools that are neither comparable across industries nor grounded in observable economic data. This paper introduces the AI Transformation Gap Index (AITG), a composite empirical framework that measures the distance between a firm's current AI deployment and a time varying, industry constrained capability frontier, then maps that distance to dollar denominated value creation, execution feasibility under uncertainty, and competitive disruption risk. Five linked modules address this gap: cross industry normalization (IASS), a dynamic capability ceiling that evolves with frontier capabilities (AFC), trajectory based firm scoring with integrated execution risk (IFS), a CES bottleneck value decomposition mapping gap scores to enterprise value (VCB), and a competitive hazard measure for inaction (ADRI). I calibrate the framework for 22 industry verticals and apply it to 14 public companies using public filings. A retrospective construct validity exercise correlating AITG scores with observed EBITDA margin expansion yields Spearman rho_s = 0.818 (n = 10), directionally consistent with predictions though insufficient for causal identification. A counterintuitive result emerges: the largest AI transformation gaps do not produce the highest value density, because implementation friction, CES bottlenecks, and timing lags erode the theoretical upside of wide gaps.
This paper proposes a positional poverty gap measure of multidimensional poverty within the Alkire-Foster counting framework. The measure captures the depth of deprivations even when indicators are ordinal, unlike the standard poverty gap, which requires cardinal variables. The proposed method draws on the fuzzy set literature and introduces a distribution-based measure of deprivation depth using the empirical cumulative distribution of each indicator, with the most deprived group as the benchmark. For each deprived individual, the method assigns a score based on the individual's relative position in the distribution. Depth is thus expressed as a difference in distributional positions, motivating the label positional poverty gap. The paper demonstrates that this measure preserves the identification and aggregation structure of the counting approach and satisfies its axiomatic properties when the reference distribution remains fixed over time. The framework remains flexible because it accommodates different identification rules, deprivation cutoffs, and variable types. Overall, it offers a simple, meaningful, and theoretically grounded way to incorporate depth into multidimensional poverty measurement with ordinal data.
Banks must optimize risky investments, dividend payouts, and capital structure under tight Basel III solvency and liquidity constraints, while costly equity issuance serves as a distress-recovery tool. We formulate this as a stochastic control problem that reduces the high-dimensional balance-sheet dynamics to a tractable one-dimensional process in the leverage ratio, with state-dependent investment limits. The resulting policy is simple and interpretable: pay dividends at an upper reflection barrier and, when needed, recapitalize only at the distress boundary, jumping to a unique target level. We characterize these thresholds analytically and show their sensitivity to regulatory parameters. From a regulatory viewpoint, we solve an outer optimization problem that maps the efficient frontier between shareholder value and survival probability (via Monte Carlo), with and without leverage caps. Results highlight that tightening solvency requirements often yields the best safety-profitability trade-off.
For a single event with finitely many mutually exclusive outcomes, the full Kelly problem is to maximize expected log wealth over nonnegative stakes together with an optional cash position. The optimal formula is classical, but the support-selection step is often presented via Lagrange multipliers. This note gives a shorter state-price derivation. A cash fraction $c$ acts as an implicit position in every outcome: in terminal-wealth terms, it is equivalent to a baseline stake $cq_i$ on outcome $i$, where $q_i$ is the state price. On any active support, explicit bets therefore only top up favorable outcomes from this baseline $cq_i$ to the optimal total stake $p_i$. This yields the formula $x_i = (p_i - c q_i)_+$, the threshold rule $p_i/q_i > c$, and, after sorting outcomes by $p_i/q_i$, a one-pass greedy algorithm for support selection. The result is standard in substance, but the implicit-position viewpoint gives a compact proof and a convenient way to remember the solution.
Cross-sectional ranking models are often deployed as if point predictions were sufficient: the model outputs scores and the portfolio follows the induced ordering. Under non-stationarity, rankers can fail during regime shifts. In the AI Stock Forecaster, a LightGBM ranker performs well overall at a 20-day horizon, yet the 2024 holdout coincides with an AI thematic rally and sector rotation that breaks the signal at longer horizons and weakens 20d. This motivates treating deployment as two decisions: (i) whether the strategy should trade at all, and (ii) how to control risk within active trades. We adapt Direct Epistemic Uncertainty Prediction (DEUP) to ranking by predicting rank displacement and defining an epistemic uncertainty signal ehat relative to a point-in-time (PIT-safe) baseline. Empirically, ehat is structurally coupled with signal strength (median correlation between ehat and absolute score is about 0.6 across 1,865 dates), so inverse-uncertainty sizing de-levers the strongest signals and degrades performance. To address this, we propose a two-level deployment policy: a strategy-level regime-trust gate G(t) that decides whether to trade (AUROC around 0.72 overall and 0.75 in FINAL) and a position-level epistemic tail-risk cap that reduces exposure only for the most uncertain predictions. The operational policy, trade only when G(t) is at least 0.2, apply volatility sizing on active dates, and cap the top epistemic tail, improves risk-adjusted performance in the 20d policy comparison and indicates DEUP adds value mainly as a tail-risk guard rather than a continuous sizing denominator.
Crypto Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) shape Web3 narratives and retail investment behaviour. In volatile, high-risk markets, their credibility becomes a key determinant of their influence on followers. Yet prior research has focused on lifestyle influencers or generic financial commentary, leaving crypto KOLs' understandings of motivation, credibility, and responsibility underexplored. Drawing on interviews with 13 KOLs and self-determination theory (SDT), we examine how psychological needs are negotiated alongside monetisation and community expectations. Whereas prior work treats finfluencer credibility as a set of static credentials, our findings reveal it to be a self-determined, ethically enacted practice. We identify four community-recognised markers of credibility: self-regulation, bounded epistemic competence, accountability, and reflexive self-correction. This reframes credibility as socio-technical performance, extending SDT into high-risk crypto ecosystems. Methodologically, we employ a hybrid human-LLM thematic analysis. The study surfaces implications for designing credibility signals that prioritise transparency over hype.