2026-10-12 | | Total: 16
Aggregate linear demand systems can be micro-founded by a population of heterogeneous consumers making discrete choices. They can also be extended to incorporate income effects. I prove these results and show how to structurally estimate this class of models using only market-level data. The distribution of consumer preferences is recovered by disciplining the corner solutions with aggregate terms only. This approach allows for the same richness of Berry, Levinsohn, and Pakes (1995) [BLP] while retaining the analytical and computational advantages of linear demand: it does not require exogenously fixing market size, allows for heterogeneity in choice sets, and results in a flexible substitution matrix which varies endogenously as different consumers enter/exit the market. The discrete-choice microfoundation facilitates welfare analysis and the flexible measurement of markups an cost pass-throughs, among a wide range of other applications.
This paper studies semi-static variance-optimal hedging of variance swaps in the rough Heston model under a risk-neutral measure. We combine dynamic trading in the underlying asset with static positions in a finite basket of European options, with the aim of minimizing the variance of the residual hedging error. Exploiting the Markovian lift provided by the forward variance curve, the Fourier representations of the claims and the Laplace transform characterization of the log-price, we derive semi-explicit formulas for the optimal strategies and the hedging error. We then study the optimal claim selection problem, investigating numerically how the choice of static instruments depends on the Hurst index. Under standard parametrization, we discover that "three options are roughly enough", i.e. adding three static vanilla options reduces the hedging error by more than 95% relative to the purely dynamic hedge for all considered roughness regimes H= 0.1, 0.3, 0.5.
Background: Credit risk modelling is fundamental in financial institutions, typically using credit history, repayment behaviour, income, and outstanding debt to estimate a borrower's probability of default. Although transactional data are sometimes incorporated through aggregated measures such as recency, frequency, and monetary indicators, behavioural information embedded in raw transaction narratives remains largely unexplored due to its unstructured nature. This limits opportunities to extract richer behavioural insights. Aim: This research investigates payment narratives from transactional data as an alternative data source for credit risk modelling. Setting: The study uses transactional data from a large South African financial institution focused on small and medium enterprises. Method: Techniques such as natural language processing and regular expressions are used to transform unstructured transaction descriptions into meaningful, explainable behavioural features by categorising transactions into interpretable spending categories. A novel categorisation algorithm was developed and evaluated for classification accuracy. The extracted features are incorporated into a credit risk scorecard to assess their predictive value. Results: The categorisation algorithm demonstrates high classification accuracy. Using these features in the scorecard resulted in a significant increase in Gini compared to a scorecard without them. Conclusion: Text-based transactional information can be systematically extracted, categorised, and operationalised to enhance credit risk model performance. Contribution: The study develops a novel, integrated, explainable methodology for transforming transactional text into behavioural features, introduces a structured RegEx-based categorisation approach, and demonstrates their predictive value within traditional scorecard frameworks.
This paper studies entropy regularization for the discrete-time dynamic mean--variance portfolio problem with no-shorting constraints. In the unconstrained setting, entropy regularization can be introduced without changing the basic quadratic structure of the dynamic program. Under no-shorting, this property is lost: a standard fixed-temperature formulation generally preserves convexity but no longer preserves the homogeneous Bellman structure and the associated piecewise-linear feedback form. We introduce a state-dependent temperature that is matched to the homogeneity of the original mean--variance problem. This restores the piecewise-quadratic value function and the finite-dimensional Bellman recursion. The resulting formulation, however, makes convexity depend on the continuation coefficients generated by the soft recursion. We show that negative continuation coefficients lead to loss of convexity and prove that a common sufficiently small temperature preserves the Bellman structure and convexity over the entire finite horizon. The original no-shorting solution is recovered as the temperature vanishes. We also develop a sample-based implementation for unknown return distributions. Numerical and empirical results illustrate both the structural advantage of the state-dependent temperature and the practical relevance of the convexity-preserving temperature restriction.
This paper studies exit timing for SPX short-straddle portfolios using a two-stage supervised and reinforcement-learning framework. Historical episodes first generate ex-post optimal hold/exit labels for training a multilayer perceptron (MLP) using only contemporaneously available state variables at deployment. The trained MLP then initializes reinforcement-learning actors that are fine-tuned with a risk-aware trading reward. Out-of-sample evaluation over 2024-2026 shows that the supervised MLP substantially outperforms passive holding and representative fixed-time and profit-and-loss-based exit rules. Across seven independent seeds, MLP-initialized Actor-Critic averages 37.54% cumulative return and a Sharpe ratio of 1.705, compared with 35.01% and 1.651 for the supervised MLP. Actor-Critic trained from scratch averages only 0.18% return. These findings show that oracle-guided supervised learning provides a stable foundation for reward-based policy fine-tuning in a sparse and path-dependent option-exit problem.
FLEX options are customized exchange-traded contracts allowing participants to choose nonstandard strikes, expirations, exercise styles, and settlement terms while retaining central clearing. We investigate whether single-name FLEX activity leaves measurable footprints in regular listed-option markets and underlying equities. Using a linked dataset of FLEX consolidations, daily open-interest files, listed-option chains, equity returns, and corporate actions over 250 trading days (March 2025-March 2026) across 41 underlyings and 53 event dates, we document three primary empirical findings: (1) Matched-control difference-in-differences estimates reveal a robust post-event increase in listed-option open interest (beta = 0.3061, p = 0.0042, Benjamini-Hochberg p = 0.0168). (2) FLEX activity is strongly selected into high implied-volatility (IV) environments, concentrated in mid-price underlyings (date-fixed-effect ATM IV premium beta = 0.1235, p = 0.0030). (3) Event-day IV-minus-realized-volatility spreads predict execution-stressed short-straddle returns (beta = 0.0366, p = 0.0100). Short-lived equity return effects (CAR_0 difference of -0.85%, p = 0.0442) do not persist over 1-to-5-day horizons. Overall, FLEX activity serves primarily as an observable marker of institutional volatility demand and open-interest positioning rather than a directional stock-return predictor.
I study how intermediary liquidity affects mortgage resolution using 1.9 million Ginnie Mae buyout options from 2019 to 2022. When funding markets froze in 2020, nonbank issuers repurchased far fewer delinquent loans than depositories servicing loans in the same pools and, within the same issuer and month, shifted repurchases away from large balances, the loans that require the most cash. About $19 billion of repurchases were delayed, and most were completed later. A model of rationing by value per dollar of cash explains this pattern and shows that borrower information is most valuable when funding is intermediate.
Large language models are stochastic by nature. Repeated executions under the same experimental conditions may produce different responses. We propose a framework that can be applied across the model lifecycle, from task design to residual behavior and continuous monitoring. The method consists of building an empirical response distribution estimated through Monte Carlo simulation. Semantic interventions are introduced to study how these distributions change. We illustrate the framework with two different tasks, borrower classification and music album recommendation, and quantify the resulting distributional changes. The framework is linked to model risk management and governance by measuring robustness and control effectiveness, and characterizing residual behavior. Since it relies only on observed responses, it can also be applied to black-box models accessed through commercial APIs.
In incomplete markets, contingent claims cannot in general be replicated exactly, and hedging must therefore be formulated as an optimization problem over admissible trading strategies. This paper studies the relation between quadratic hedging and entropic hedging in a discrete-time incomplete market when strategies are restricted to bounded finite-dimensional parametric classes. These restrictions induce admissible gain sets that are compact and convex in \(L^2\), providing a common well-posed setting for both the restricted mean-square hedging problem and the restricted exponential-utility hedging problem. The main contribution is to establish a uniform small-risk-aversion expansion of the entropic risk functional over the restricted gain set and to use this uniformity to obtain convergence of the corresponding minimizers. Under a uniform exponential integrability assumption, the restricted entropic hedging gains converge in \(L^2\) to the unique restricted quadratic hedge as the risk-aversion parameter tends to zero. The theoretical result is illustrated numerically in a regularized discrete-time stochastic volatility model of Heston type.
Mental accounting is usually explained by self-control, and two-stage budgeting by separable preferences. We propose a third explanation based on sellers' market power. A consumer who commits to spend a fixed number of dollars in a category has unit-elastic demand, so a seller in that category gains nothing by restricting quantity. A consumer who instead targets a fixed physical quantity has perfectly inelastic demand, a case that a monopolist can exploit. We characterize the commitments that remove a seller's incentive to mark up prices, and show that the fixed dollar budget is the least restrictive. We then show that what matters is budget rigidity rather than separability of preferences. A consumer who re-optimizes her category budget when prices change is insulated from market power only if categories are substitutes; a rigid budget insulates her in every case. Mental accounting can therefore be read as a commitment device against markups, a rationale that is separate from the self-control motive in the existing literature.
The terminal crisis of capitalism has been predicted regularly since 1848. It has not occurred. We treat this 175-year forecasting record as a stylized fact in need of a model, and we supply one, unifying results from adaptive systems, mechanism design and computational complexity, behavioral decision theory, global games, and the political economy of redistribution. Ten assumptions deliver twelve formal results and one theorem. Recurring shock classes have geometrically decaying collapse hazards: within the banking class alone, the lag from systemic failure to a system-wide deposit backstop fell from 816 days (1930-33) to 18 days (2008) to 2 days (2023). A centralized replacement of the price mechanism fails on at least one of two horns, computation or truthful input, and we are explicit about which horn survives modern algorithms. We derive Davies's J-curve from cumulative prospect theory together with a new result: the revolutionary window closes endogenously, with length inversely proportional to the speed of hedonic adaptation, roughly four to nine years at calibrated parameters, and with its perceptibility threshold derived from the participation constraint rather than assumed. Personalized media shift protest games, in the model, into the unique no-attack equilibrium of a global game. Redistribution is a dial, not an identity: countries with market Ginis of 0.505-0.512 sustain disposable Ginis from 0.273 to 0.395. We state seven testable predictions and six falsification conditions, and map which assumption each rival school must deny.
Correlation matrices combine nonlinear positive-definiteness constraints with a simultaneous row-column permutation symmetry. Their generation therefore involves two distinct problems. First, every output must remain on the correlation elliptope, irrespective of how its variables are ordered. Second, the generator must learn the domain-specific distribution occupied by empirical data inside that valid space. Existing financial image generators mix these problems: they learn ordered matrix entries and repair invalid draws afterward. We introduce CorrFlow, which separates them. A generalized Fisher transform maps full-rank correlation matrices bijectively to unconstrained coordinates, guaranteeing valid outputs without projection. A graph flow-matching network learns the empirical distribution in those coordinates and is permutation equivariant: reordering the variables only reorders the output. We compare a conditional CorrGAN reimplementation, image diffusion, and CorrFlow on $80\times80$ Taiwan equity matrices using five seeds per neural method. CorrFlow produces 100% valid draws without repair and obtains feature sliced-Wasserstein distance $.712\pm.141$, versus $4.339\pm.252$ for CorrGAN and $4.610\pm.191$ for image diffusion after their invalid outputs are projected back to the correlation space. It also improves this distance over historical lookup, while lookup retains higher local coverage. These results support the combined construction under the evaluated training budget; they do not establish superiority over fully tuned image models or isolate the contribution of each component.
Feature selection is a central problem in high-dimensional financial regression, where large numbers of engineered variables and strong correlations among predictors reduce model stability and interpretability. $L_1$ regularization (Lasso) is widely used for sparse regression, but its shrinkage can be restrictive when informative signals are spread across correlated variables. Exact sparse regression avoids this shrinkage but requires solving a combinatorial optimization problem that is computationally difficult and is typically fit to minimize in-sample rather than out-of-sample error. This paper presents a feature selection framework based on Monte Carlo Tree Search with Generalized Nested Rollout Policy Adaptation (GNRPA). Feature selection is formulated as a sequential decision process, and candidate subsets are scored by their out-of-sample validation performance rather than training error. The method also supports a lexicographic objective accounting for subset size and multicollinearity. We study this approach on a contemporaneous explanatory regression task: explaining the weekly return of the NASDAQ-100 index from 1,072 engineered features spanning market, macroeconomic, and factor data. This isolates the value of subset selection under multicollinearity from the separate problem of predictive forecasting. On this task, the proposed method identifies sparse feature subsets with higher out-of-sample explanatory power than an optimized Lasso baseline, reaching an out-of-sample $R^2$ of 0.6961 versus 0.6313 for Lasso. These results suggest that Monte Carlo Tree Search is a practical alternative to convex regularization for sparse explanatory feature selection in financial regression, with potential value for factor attribution and risk decomposition where transparency matters as much as out-of-sample fit.
A realized tail-risk conditional autoregressive expectile (RTCARE) model is proposed for joint forecasting of value-at-risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES). Realized tail measures such as the realized quantile and the realized ES, constructed from intraday high-frequency returns, are incorporated into the dynamics and measurement equations of the conditional expectile, allowing information about lower-tail risk to enter the forecasts. The parameters are estimated by Markov chain Monte Carlo, and we evaluate the resulting VaR-ES forecasts in numerical examples and in an empirical application using U.S. stock-return data. Across the considered tail levels, the RTCARE models deliver competitive and often superior forecasting performance relative to existing alternatives, with stable results across Monte Carlo replications and rolling forecast evaluations.
AI shopping assistants increasingly influence which products consumers consider. We study retail assortment planning under AI mediation, where a retailer chooses a catalog, an AI intermediary forms a customer-facing shortlist, and the customer chooses from that shortlist according to a multinomial logit model. We consider both deterministic mediation, in which the AI follows a fixed segment-specific ranking, and stochastic mediation based on the Plackett-Luce model. Empirically, we construct a dataset of product rankings from leading AI models, estimate Plackett-Luce ranking models, and evaluate their predictive performance on held-out assortments. Combining these estimates with synthetic customer preferences, we find that accounting for AI mediation can materially change optimal assortments and revenue. Across the tested capacity configurations, ignoring mediation yields mean revenue losses between 2.52% and 11.37% relative to the PL optimum. A much simpler deterministic plug-in, based only on the ordering of fitted AI utilities, performs substantially better, with mean losses of at most 0.53%. Motivated by this performance, we study assortment optimization under deterministic mediation. We characterize its computational complexity and show that, for any fixed number of customer segments, the problem admits a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme.
When a trader executes a large order, the relevant question is not \emph{what will the price be?} but \emph{what would the price have been had I not traded?} Market impact is thus a causal quantity, yet classical models (Almgren--Chriss, propagators) regress price on flow, which is biased whenever informed flow moves prices through information as well as trading. We present a proof-of-concept \emph{Causal Market Simulator}: a continuous-time causal prior-data fitted network (PFN) trained on a synthetic market prior in which a hidden informational flow confounds the flow--price relation by construction, with confounding strength an exact per-episode knob. On this prior, the naive estimator's bias follows a closed form we confirm empirically (up to 68\% overestimation), while the PFN tracks the unbiased true-parameter oracle at high confounding. Its \emph{do-ablated twin}, the same model with the intervention inputs removed, collapses onto the pre-window mean. Zero-shot, the model responds at the ground-truth scale to metaorders in an ABIDES limit-order book ($+0.38$ pre-onset standard deviations against seed-replay counterfactuals), and its intervention response replicates on about 2,300 detected flow bursts in BTC/ETH/SOL perpetuals and 3,800 on Nasdaq equities, evidence consistent with, though not proof of, causal transfer. Off-prior the response degrades gracefully, and split-conformal recalibration repairs interval calibration. Transfer hinges on encoding the metaorder as added flow rather than a clamped price level, not on more training. A recurrent state-space variant closes the remaining shape gap: its impact accrues over execution duration where the transformer's stays flat, raising the correlation with measured metaorder impact from $+0.68$ to between $+0.92$ and $+0.96$, at the cost of weaker on-prior deconfounding that traces to the training recipe rather than to recurrence.