2026-11-02 | | Total: 8
Risk management of worst-of autocallables needs price sensitivities (Greeks) up to third order and the potential future exposure, a tail quantile of the note's future value. In Monte Carlo, each order of differentiation multiplies the sampling noise by a factor that grows with the observation frequency, and nested simulation turns the noise of its inner paths into a bias of the quantile. We instead solve the backward pricing recursion, storing the continuation value as an $hp$ functional tensor train (hp-FTT) whose piecewise-polynomial cores are split at the barriers, so that worst-of barrier events act exactly, with rank one. For Gaussian transitions we show that the polynomial degree sufficient for an error $\varepsilon$ grows only as $\sqrt{\log(1/\varepsilon)}$. One solve then gives every Greek at any spot without sampling noise, by integrating the likelihood-ratio weight against the stored value, and the values it stores at future dates replace inner simulation. Against the strongest Monte Carlo estimators we could build or find published, on worst-of autocallables observed monthly on three to five assets, the order of the Greek and the accuracy decide which method is cheaper. At $1\%$ accuracy Monte Carlo is more than an order of magnitude cheaper for deltas, second-order Greeks go either way, and hp-FTT is cheaper for every third-order Greek, by up to two orders of magnitude. At $0.1\%$ hp-FTT is cheaper for every Greek we could check, under geometric Brownian motion and local volatility alike. For the exposure alone Monte Carlo is cheaper at $1\%$ and hp-FTT at $0.1\%$, and a solve run for the Greeks yields it for little more than scenario sampling. Sampling pays in variance for each derivative and hp-FTT in rank for each asset, so Monte Carlo keeps low-order Greeks at percent accuracy, rarely observed contracts and many assets.
The main goal of this article is to present a new software component created by the authors in GAUSS for implementing dynamic tests for contagion. These tests are aimed at providing the possibilities of testing for spiller-over effects between financial markets during a crisis or during a pandemic situation such as the one that we experienced recently. Unlike standard tests for contagion that have fixed dates for a potential shift, the tests implemented here are dynamic in the sense that the potential contagion effect is measured across the time span. The leverage bootstrap simulation technique is utilized in order to generate critical values that are reliable when the tests are implemented in order to make sure that the conducted inference is accurate. Since the approach is new, software component needs to be created for conducting the underlying tests, which is accomplished via this article. The module is very easy to implement by the general practitioners via a graphical user interface. An application is offered by using real data from stock markets in order to demonstrate how the software component can be used.
Expected shortfall (ES) is routinely estimated from a short sample of profit-and-loss (P&L) scenarios built from overlapping multi-day returns, while the non-parametric estimators applied to such data are designed under independent sampling. We study how this mismatch affects estimation accuracy and capital coverage, and how it interacts with serial dependence and heavy tails in the underlying P&L. Working within the coherent risk estimation framework, we compare six order-statistic-based ES estimators on fit, bias, and capital-coverage metrics. Following the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB), we use a one-year estimation window and ES at the $2.5\%$ confidence level as a benchmark setup. We combine simulations with market data on twelve risk factors and ninety-nine equity portfolios. We show that overlapping sampling does not merely add noise but shifts ES estimates systematically downward, thereby weakening capital coverage. Serial dependence acts in the same direction, and heavy tails amplify both effects. More conservative weighting mitigates the underestimation but does not remove it. On market data, the confidence level at which the estimated capital covers realized losses roughly doubles in median under overlapping sampling for every estimator, while the $\textrm{ES}_{2.5\%}$-to-$\textrm{VaR}_{1\%}$ ratio, which links the FRTB base market risk capital metric to its pre-FRTB predecessor, changes comparatively little. Overlapping sampling can thus substantially understate ES-based capital. Since many banks apply a small set of standard estimators in their FRTB regulatory or economic capital model in a historical simulation approach, this understatement is likely to be common for many institutions, and combining simulation-based assessment of estimation risk with coverage-based diagnostics offers a practical method to detect it in model validation and monitoring.
Does the deepest drawdown take the longest to recover? For random walks with iid increments of positive finite mean, we find that the deepest and longest episodes are eventually distinct almost surely under light-tailed losses, but coincide with probability tending to one under heavy-tailed losses. More precisely, when losses have a finite exponential moment, the deepest episode's duration, relative to the longest among $n$ episodes, converges in probability to an explicit $ρ\in(0,1)$, while its descending duration rank is $n^{1-ρ+o_{\mathbb{P}}(1)}$. These limits hold for every fixed number of leading depths; in the Gaussian model, $ρ=1/2$, independently of drift and variance. The separation reflects the different exponential costs of reaching a large depth and sustaining a long episode. For regularly varying losses, a common large loss governs both depth and duration: the duration ratio tends to one almost surely, and for every fixed $k$, the $k$ deepest and $k$ longest episodes have the same indices in the same order with probability tending to one. For any $k_n\to\infty$ with $k_n=o(n)$, the proportion of common episodes among the $k_n$ deepest and $k_n$ longest converges in probability to zero in the light-tailed case and to one in the heavy-tailed case. These ranking laws also hold for completed drawdowns within a deterministic observation horizon.
Formulaic alpha miners increasingly differ in how they generate candidates, yet each system typically couples its own representation, evaluator, and selector into a bespoke pipeline whose results are difficult to reproduce or compare. We present QBX, a compiler that defines a well-formed, auditable space of alpha programs. A finite, versioned block registry and whole-strategy port-DAG language define the candidate space; the compiler either rejects a proposal with structured diagnostics or emits an evidence-carrying IR with types, time-availability effects, executable linkage, and Merkle-style content identities. Compiler-closed actions keep search inside the admitted space, node identities support incremental evaluation, and context-bound root identities govern program deduplication and trial provenance. The availability-effect system rejects contract-visible look-ahead while admitting legal point-in-time forecasts. On Chinese A-share panels, evaluation-valid proposals increase from 26.8% for free strings and 36.4% for a grammar-only control to 97.7% for typed programs. Incremental evaluation replays search lineages 7.5 times faster with numerical parity, while the availability checker admits zero registered-contract violations across 23,342 candidates. Under matched LLM-call budgets, compiler-closed search reaches the pool-specific diagnostic frontier with substantially fewer calls. These results concern validity, reuse, and search efficiency within the registered vocabulary, not an increase in the information available from the market panel.
Delivered-cost estimates are often used as proxies for hydrogen import prices. Yet they measure average supply-chain costs, whereas marginal prices measure the system value of an additional unit. Market interactions can make the two diverge, potentially biasing long-term price assumptions. We quantify this gap using an 81-region global hydrogen-market model, comparing each region's costs and prices when only its demand is active and when all regions' demands are active. The 2045 price-cost gap is positive in 78 regions and averages 63 EUR/MWh (52% of the single-buyer cost) on a demand-weighted basis. Only 12 EUR/MWh reflects higher average sourcing costs due to competing demand. The remaining 51 EUR/MWh is the difference between the global-market price and the delivered portfolio's average cost. In several regions, wholesale prices rise while average delivered costs fall. Hydrogen strategies should distinguish delivered-cost benchmarks from market-price expectations, as low-cost supply does not guarantee low regional market prices.
Incomplete long-term contracting in electricity markets can expose investors and consumers to inefficient levels of risk. This paper investigates how incompleteness impacts the optimal choice of climate policy. We develop a game-theoretic model of optimal policy-making in anticipation of how electricity market agents react to a given policy when gas prices and demand are uncertain and contracting is incomplete. In illustrative experiments, we observe that renewable subsidies and carbon prices induce an insurance co-benefit when markets are incomplete. This is because, relative to a complete market benchmark, incompleteness shifts investment from renewables toward gas and exposes consumers to uninsured risk from inter-annual volatility in electricity prices. By incentivizing investment in renewables, subsidies and carbon prices indirectly counteract these distortions. Consequently, incompleteness increases the optimal subsidy and carbon price levels in our experiments. Renewable subsidies exhibit a stronger insurance effect than carbon pricing, as the latter leads to more investment in gas with carbon capture and storage and more volatile electricity prices. While carbon pricing is more economically efficient than subsidies in complete markets, incompleteness shrinks its efficiency advantage and even leads to cases where subsidies are more economically efficient.
A 2BSDE system is written down for a $(D+1)$-dimensional Black--Scholes partial differential equation (PDE) with the Leland transaction cost model which incorporates the sign of the curvature. The 2BSDE system takes input from the ``speed'' (derivative of the curvature). This system is solved using a single ResNet neural network which learns both the solution to the PDE as well as the degrees of freedom in the curvature matrix. The network is used to learn the price of derivatives such as call options and butterfly spreads on geometric baskets for $D=10,100$ achieving a time-averaged RMSE of less than $0.1$ in each case.