2026-08-18 | | Total: 4
We measure volatility roughness across asset classes using a common data infrastructure and pipeline. Our data covers 3,926 United States equities, 34 CME futures roots, rates, FX, and commodities, and options on 44 underlyings over 2010-2025. Realized volatility is rough everywhere. The class-median Hurst estimate ranges from $0.05$ (livestock) through $0.07-0.10$ (rates, FX, agriculture, energy, metals) to $0.13$ (single stocks) and $0.20$ (equity indices). The option-implied measure identifies $H$ only where the leverage effect produces a clean skew term structure. For the equity indices, implied estimates of $0.21-0.28$ are just above realized volatility $H$, while for rates and FX the ATM skew regression fails with an R-squared near zero even though realized volatility remains rough. We also show a mean-reversion contamination formula for the second-moment estimator of the roughness for the stationary fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. The local slope of the increment second moment deviates from $2H$ by $(1-H)Γ(2H+1)(κΔ)^{2-2H}$ for all $H\in(0,1)$. A correction framework for the second moment, when the log realized volatility measure has additive noise, raised the $H$ estimate slightly but nowhere near the Brownian diffusion framework. Finally, a failure taxonomy discusses where rough-volatility methods apply and where they fail, suggesting alternative paths to further explore the rough-volatility paradigm.
We study optimal investment for insurers managing participating (profit-sharing) contracts under probability distortion and probability benchmark (aspiration) constraints. The problem combines three theoretical complexities: (i) nonconcave effective utilities induced by embedded guarantees and surplus-sharing rules, (ii) probability weighting capturing behavioral aspects of long-horizon decisions, and (iii) aspiration-type constraints formalizing solvency requirements. Using quantile formulations and concavification techniques, we derive explicit closed-form solutions for optimal terminal wealth and trading strategies in both complete and incomplete Black-Scholes markets. Our utility class accommodates the piecewise hyperbolic absolute risk aversion (PHARA) family and covers nonconcavities arising naturally in insurance contexts. The framework reveals how probability distortion weakens lock-in behavior and induces time inconsistency: under inverse S-shaped distortions, insurers overestimate upside probabilities and increase risky investment relative to undistorted benchmarks. Asymptotic analysis and numerical illustrations demonstrate regime switches in optimal policies driven by regulatory thresholds and capital constraints. Our results extend the hope-fear-aspirations framework of He and Zhou (2016) and provide practical insights for managing insurance balance sheets under behavioral preferences and solvency constraints.
We propose a novel valuation framework for contingent convertible (CoCo) bonds based on the issuing bank's Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio, which is widely acknowledged as an indicator of a bank's solvency. Our approach develops a bivariate jump-diffusion model that captures the dynamic relationship linking the CET1 ratios, share prices, and CoCo bond prices, incorporating both continuous market movements and correlated jump risk. The model advances existing literature through three key innovations: (1) a hybrid mechanism for modeling regulatory discretion in trigger decisions, (2) a class of power conversion schemes that generalizes traditional approaches while maintaining analytical tractability, and (3) a method to overcome the temporal discrepancy between high-frequency market data and low-frequency regulatory reporting. We derive semi-closed form formulas for both write-down and equity-convertible CoCo bonds and validate our model through five case studies spanning from 2009 to 2023, including an in-depth analysis of the 2023 Credit Suisse collapse. The results demonstrate a significant improvement in pricing and hedging performance while highlighting the model's data-adaptive nature that enables short-term predictions.
We develop a scalable adjoint-to-control framework for continuous-time portfolio choice under smooth pointwise constraints. A feasible direct-policy-optimization (DPO) policy supplies rollouts; after training, fixed-latent open-loop BPTT (OL-BPTT) yields first- and second-order pathwise sensitivities, whose conditional projections produce adapted adjoint inputs. A nested antithetic common-random-number regression estimates the shifted wealth-row martingale input, and deployment solves the local generalized-Hamiltonian problem by an exact QP for quadratic-affine blocks or by a log barrier otherwise. We prove an OL-BPTT--PMP correspondence retaining orthogonal projection residuals, a local barrier--KKT approximation, and a performance-to-adjoint bridge under local quadratic growth. In an n=100 constrained Merton benchmark, the learned first adjoint has 0.46% mean relative error; under the analytical policy, the first adjoint, wealth curvature, and Brownian coefficient have nRMSEs of 0.031%, 0.035%, and 0.326%. In a terminal-only predictable-return CRRA benchmark, wealth homogeneity gives $P^{X\bullet,*}=D^2_{X\bullet}V$ and $ζ^{X,*}=0$. At the primary $512\times16$ projection budget, the full estimated-shift decoder has policy RMSE below $8.5\times10^{-3}$, while the benchmark-specific zero-shift oracle is below $2\times10^{-4}$. Across constraint, factor, barrier, and switching-region audits, recovery sharply reduces local KKT residuals and remains practical for portfolios with up to 100 risky assets.