2024-12-03 | | Total: 6
Economic growth in Sweden during the early 20th Century was largely driven by industry. A significant contributor to this growth was the installation of different kinds of engines used to power factories. We use newly digitized data on engines and their energy source by industry sector, and combine this with municipality-level data of workers per industry sector to construct a new variable reflecting economic output using dirty engines. In turn, we assess the average externality of dirty output on mortality in the short-run, as defined by deaths over the population in the baseline year. Our results show substantial increases of up to 17% higher mortality in cities where large increases to dirty engine installations occurred, which is largely driven by the elderly. We also run a placebo test using clean powered industry and find no effect on mortality.
This paper contributes to the literature on parametric demand estimation by using deep learning to model consumer preferences. Traditional econometric methods often struggle with limited within-product price variation, a challenge addressed by the proposed neural network approach. The proposed method estimates the functional form of the demand and demonstrates higher performance in both simulations and empirical applications. Notably, under low price variation, the machine learning model outperforms econometric approaches, reducing the mean squared error of initial price parameter estimates by nearly threefold. In empirical setting, the ML model consistently predicts a negative relationship between demand and price in 100% of cases, whereas the econometric approach fails to do so in 20% of cases. The suggested model incorporates a wide range of product characteristics, as well as prices of other products and competitors.
An axiomatic approach to macroeconomics based on the mathematical structure of thermodynamics is presented. It deduces relations between aggregate properties of an economy, concerning quantities and flows of goods and money, prices and the value of money, without any recourse to microeconomic foundations about the preferences and actions of individual economic agents. The approach has three important payoffs. 1) it provides a new and solid foundation for aspects of standard macroeconomic theory such as the existence of market prices, the value of money, the meaning of inflation, the symmetry and negative-definiteness of the macro-Slutsky matrix, and the Le Chatelier-Samuelson principle, without relying on implausibly strong rationality assumptions over individual microeconomic agents. 2) the approach generates new results, including implications for money flow and trade when two or more economies are put in contact, in terms of new concepts such as economic entropy, economic temperature, goods' values and money capacity. Some of these are related to standard economic concepts (eg marginal utility of money, market prices). Yet our approach derives them at a purely macroeconomic level and gives them a meaning independent of usual restrictions. Others of the concepts, such as economic entropy and temperature, have no direct counterparts in standard economics, but they have important economic interpretations and implications, as aggregate utility and the inverse marginal aggregate utility of money, respectively. 3) this analysis promises to open up new frontiers in macroeconomics by building a bridge to ideas from non-equilibrium thermodynamics. More broadly, we hope that the economic analogue of entropy (governing the possible transitions between states of economic systems) may prove to be as fruitful for the social sciences as entropy has been in the natural sciences.
The bullwhip study has received a lot of attention in the literature, but with conflicting results, especially in the context of data aggregation. In this paper, we investigate three widely studied factors in bullwhip measurement: time aggregation, product aggregation, and seasonality. In time aggregation, we decompose the variance into two components: the expectation of the subset variances and the variance of subset expectations, thus decomposing the bullwhip ratio into four components to explore the underlying mechanism of time aggregation. In product aggregation, the bullwhip ratio is analyzed in the context of products with either uncorrelated or correlated demands and orders. Seasonality is also examined to study its effect on the bullwhip ratio. Our key findings are: (a) Time aggregation can increase, decrease, or maintain the bullwhip ratio in different scenarios. (b) Aggregated bullwhip ratio of uncorrelated products is a weighted average of bullwhip ratios from individual products, with corresponding demand variance as the weights. However, aggregated bullwhip ratio of correlated products could break the boundaries. (c) Seasonality can be considered as a standalone product with a bullwhip ratio of one, which can drive the overall bullwhip ratio closer to one.
This paper examines the impact of racial discrimination in hiring on employment, wage, and wealth disparities between black and white workers. Using a labor search-and-matching model with racially prejudiced and non-prejudiced firms, we show that labor market frictions sustain discriminatory practices as an equilibrium outcome. These practices account for 44% to 52% of the average wage gap and 16% of the median wealth gap. Discriminatory hiring also amplifies unemployment and wage volatility for black workers, increasing their labor market risks over business cycles. Eliminating prejudiced firms reduces these disparities and improves black workers' welfare, though it slightly decreases overall economic welfare.
We investigate how advanced large language models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4, process corporate disclosures to forecast earnings. Using earnings press releases issued around GPT-4's knowledge cutoff date, we address two questions: (1) Do GPT-generated earnings forecasts outperform analysts in accuracy? (2) How is GPT's performance related to its processing of textual and quantitative information? Our findings suggest that GPT forecasts are significantly less accurate than those of analysts. This underperformance can be traced to GPT's distinct textual and quantitative approaches: its textual processing follows a consistent, generalized pattern across firms, highlighting its strengths in language tasks. In contrast, its quantitative processing capabilities vary significantly across firms, revealing limitations tied to the uneven availability of domain-specific training data. Additionally, there is some evidence that GPT's forecast accuracy diminishes beyond its knowledge cutoff, underscoring the need to evaluate LLMs under hindsight-free conditions. Overall, this study provides a novel exploration of the "black box" of GPT-4's information processing, offering insights into LLMs' potential and challenges in financial applications.