Total: 1

#1 Language Models are Few-Shot Learners [PDF3] [Copy] [Kimi7]

Authors: Tom B. Brown ; Benjamin Mann ; Nick Ryder ; Melanie Subbiah ; Jared Kaplan ; Prafulla Dhariwal ; Arvind Neelakantan ; Pranav Shyam ; Girish Sastry ; Amanda Askell ; Sandhini Agarwal ; Ariel Herbert-Voss ; Gretchen Krueger ; Tom Henighan ; Rewon Child ; Aditya Ramesh ; Daniel M. Ziegler ; Jeffrey Wu ; Clemens Winter ; Christopher Hesse ; Mark Chen ; Eric Sigler ; Mateusz Litwin ; Scott Gray ; Benjamin Chess ; Jack Clark ; Christopher Berner ; Sam McCandlish ; Alec Radford ; Ilya Sutskever ; Dario Amodei

Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with 175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model, and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3 achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation, question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time, we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles, as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding and of GPT-3 in general.