Total: 1
Recently, a ∼3.9σ preference for dynamical dark energy from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) collaboration inspired hot debates on new physics or systematics. In this letter, we reveal this significant preference is dominated by an external low-redshift supernova (low-z SN) sample that combines with the Dark Energy Survey SN program (DES-SN) in their Year 5 data release (DESY5). Further implementing the aB (the intercept of the SN magnitude-redshift relation) diagnosis between low-z and DES-SN samples, we find large dispersions in the low-z SN sample with a ∼0.043 magnitude discrepancy in −5aB from the high-z DES-SN sample, suggesting potential systematics in DESY5. Correcting for this low-z systematics or directly ignoring the low-z sample can largely reduce the preference for dynamical DE to be <2σ. Therefore, the DESI preference for dynamical DE might be a mirage of low-z SN systematics with a mismatch intercept. Our additional test demonstrates the currently available data cannot provide decisive evidence for dynamical DE.