Total: 1
The study of meteoroid streams reveals the full complexity of these structures. At present, we have no objective method of deciding whether the parameters of the observed meteoroid stream represent a further solution to an already known object or whether they relate to a new discovery. As result, the Meteor Data Center (MDC) database of the International Astronomical Union (IAU) contains duplicates and false duplicates of the meteor showers. It is desirable to detect questionable cases and, if possible, correct their status, thereby contributing to the improvement of the content of the IAU MDC database. The correct content of the MDC database is important in its applications, for example, in assessing the threat from meteoroids to Earth's artificial satellites. Two approaches were used, in the first the internal compatibility of geocentric and heliocentric parameters representing a given flux was verified. In the second, a comparison of two or more solutions of the same stream was made in as much detail as possible. Fifty-six streams were verified, for which clear suspicion of misclassification was established in our earlier work. For 43 streams, the misclassification was confirmed, with a proposal to change their status in the MDC to autonomous. In the remaining 13 cases, it was proposed to leave their status unchanged. Although we do not consider it 'definitive', our study clearly shows that repeated misclassification of new meteoroid flux solutions has occurred in the past. Correction of these cases will significantly improve the content of the MDC database. As an additional product, based on the approach proposed in this and our earlier work, relevant procedures have been proposed, which, available on the MDC database website, will make it possible to compare new meteoroid data with the contents of the database, thereby avoiding errors in their classification.