Total: 1
We introduce a model of sequential social learning in which a planner may pay a cost to adjust the private signal precision of some agents. This framework presents a new optimization problem for social learning that sheds light on practical policy questions, such as how the socially optimal level of ad personalization changes according to current beliefs or how a biased planner might derail social learning. We then characterize the optimal policies of an altruistic planner who maximizes social welfare and a biased planner who seeks to induce a specific action. Even for a planner who has equivalent knowledge to an individual, cannot lie or cherry-pick information, and is fully observable, we demonstrate that it can dramatically influence social welfare in both positive and negative directions. An important area for future exploration is how one might prevent these latter outcomes to protect against the manipulation of social learning.