Total: 1
Several scholars have accorded the Tychonic System a prominent place, considering it a credible alternative to the Ptolemaic and Copernican systems. In recent years, there have even been some enthusiastic contributions in support of Brahe, which have sought to show how his solutions were the most suitable for providing scientifics support to the new observations that were accumulating between the late 16th century and the mid-17th century. In this work, after analyzing these contributions, I proceed to demonstrate that the Tychonic system had so many critical points, many of which have not been adequately noted by historical criticism, that it did not deserve all the attention it received, neither at the time of its publication, nor in Galileo's time, nor in subsequent periods, because it never constituted a truly credible alternative, and that its reputation as the "third system of the world" is entirely undeserved.