Total: 1
This work presents a comparative analysis of Reduced-Order Models (ROMs) applied to incompressible fluid dynamics within geometrically parametrized domains. Two distinct reduced-order solution strategies are investigated and compared: a monolithic coupled solver and a segregated SIMPLE-based algorithm. Their performance is assessed on two steady, two-dimensional benchmark cases: a lid-driven cavity flow and a flow past a cylindrical obstacle. The two algorithms are compared in terms of fields evaluation and aerodynamic coefficients prediction. The computational results highlight a fundamental trade-off between accuracy and numerical efficiency. On the one hand, after an opportune supremizers enrichment, the coupled approach guarantees a faster convergence, despite the need of a larger number of degrees of freedom. On the other hand, the segregated SIMPLE algorithm yields superior reconstruction accuracy, particularly for lower-dimensional reduced spaces, at the cost of a slower convergence rate.