Total: 1
Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in healthcare applications, however, their use in clinical practice is still limited by diagnostic hallucinations and insufficiently interpretable reasoning. We present MedCollab, a novel multi-agent framework that emulates the hierarchical consultation workflow of modern hospitals to autonomously navigate the full-cycle diagnostic process. The framework incorporates a dynamic specialist recruitment mechanism that adaptively assembles clinical and examination agents according to patient-specific symptoms and examination results. To ensure the rigor of clinical work, we adopt a structured Issue-Based Information System (IBIS) argumentation protocol that requires agents to provide ``Positions'' backed by traceable evidence from medical knowledge and clinical data. Furthermore, the framework constructs a Hierarchical Disease Causal Chain that transforms flattened diagnostic predictions into a structured model of pathological progression through explicit logical operators. A multi-round Consensus Mechanism iteratively filters low-quality reasoning through logic auditing and weighted voting. Evaluated on real-world clinical datasets, MedCollab significantly outperforms pure LLMs and medical multi-agent systems in Accuracy and RaTEScore, demonstrating a marked reduction in medical hallucinations. These findings indicate that MedCollab provides an extensible, transparent, and clinically compliant approach to medical decision-making.