Total: 1
The distribution of a normal mean-variance mixture depends on the law of its positive mixing variable. We compare six parametric mixing laws with a grid nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator under the same determinant identification constraint. The mixing mean $m=\E(Z)$ is estimated and is not fixed at one. A paired block bootstrap is used to compare multivariate holdout log scores. The models that cannot be distinguished from the model with the largest score define a finite ambiguity set. We then consider a cumulative prospect problem on a common portfolio direction. For each model in the set, the NMVM representation gives a scalar projected return and a corresponding prospect-value function of the exposure. The distributionally robust decision maximizes the lower envelope of these functions. We prove existence of a solution, give the candidate points for the piecewise smooth problem, derive a reference-gap scaling result, and construct an interval branch-and-bound certificate for the finite-scenario optimum. In an application to 30 stock returns, the mixture models give higher holdout density scores than the multivariate Gaussian model. Several parametric and semi-parametric models, however, remain in the ambiguity set. The worst-case model is therefore determined at the portfolio optimization stage rather than selected in advance from a point estimate of the holdout score.