Total: 1
Background-field lattice calculations extract weak-field response coefficients from correlators computed at several field strengths. We treat this extraction as linear estimation in field space and compare fixed cancellation stencils with covariance-optimized, generalized-least-squares estimators of the same coefficient, using archival nucleon double ratios on about 1000 quenched configurations at six quark masses and decuplet correlators for which exact answers follow from the lattice contractions. The fixed $O(B^4)$-$O(B^8)$ stencils are nearly coincident and cost almost nothing in precision. Weight-free null-space tests reject the two-term response model in most nucleon ensembles; whether they reject the three-term model depends on the temporal fits and on the noise of the estimated temporal covariance, which raises the null-contrast error by a factor of 1.7-2.4. With that noise included, covariance optimization gains 1-2% in precision at the five lighter masses (3-30% with two-state time fits, which also lower moments by 3-10%) and nothing on independent data halves, while its weights carry three to four orders of magnitude more leverage on omitted response modes than the fixed stencils and move the moments by up to 1.8 marginal standard errors. The decuplet controls show what such leverage does under misspecification: the first-order responses obey $μ_{Δ^+}/μ_{Δ^{++}}=1/2$ and $μ_{Δ^0}=0$ exactly. The lowest-order estimate misses the first by 10-25 standard errors. The fixed $O(B^4)$-$O(B^8)$ stencils satisfy it within errors in the production windows, whereas the correlated linear fit in $B^2$, with the same constraints as the $O(B^4)$ stencil, misses it by 3-17%; the null-space test rejects that fit's model. The results distinguish statistical precision from robustness to omitted response modes; they are not physical-point magnetic moments.