2026-10-09 | | Total: 4
Energy harvesting (EH) technology has emerged as a key approach for extending the operational autonomy of Internet of Things (IoT) devices. In this context, medium access control (MAC) protocols for EH-IoT make use of the harvested energy efficiently to enhance the application performance. However, many existing MAC protocols rely on stored energy the battery in devising energy-aware strategies, which can interrupt the device operation and hinder the execution of ongoing tasks in dynamic and low EH conditions. To address this, this paper presents an energy-aware receiver-initiated MAC protocol for EH-IoT devices, called EARI-MAC, that adjusts the duty cycle of the receiver device based on stored energy and current harvesting power using the mathematical formulation. This approach supports sustained receiver operation under low EH conditions and improved application performance when harvested energy is abundant. The performance of the EARI-MAC has been evaluated in simulation using the real solar data gathered in Novi Sad, for three consecutive days. The simulation results demonstrate that the EARI-MAC utilizes the available energy resources efficiently and improves the packet delivery ratio and network throughput by more than 10%, reduces the receiver energy consumption by 5.6% and 8.2% and energy consumption per bit by 9.6% and 13.9% compared with QPPD-MAC and energy-unaware MAC, respectively.
KV-cache entries are stored before their future queries are known, but each decoding query needs precision in different places. We study this mismatch using separate budgets for retained bits and bits fetched per query. ReadKV stores each key and value in a progressive code whose prefixes support different reconstruction precisions. For each query, it allocates key-channel prefixes using the query, computes attention from the reconstructed keys, and then allocates value-token prefixes using that attention. Stored entries remain unchanged. Each stage optimizes a calibrated distortion objective under a fixed budget; we prove exact allocation under diminishing refinement gains and relate these objectives to attention-output error. We also exhibit a finite-dimensional attention family where query-dependent access strictly outperforms every query-independent reader at the same read budget, even with unrestricted competing encoders and decoders. Across six base models, reading four bits on average from an eight-bit cache increases C4 perplexity by at most 0.66%, using about one quarter of the logical reads and half the retained capacity of a 16-bit cache. It is consistently more accurate than storing and fully reading four bits at the same payload-read budget. Retaining more bits than each query fetches is aimed at long-context decoding, where the cache bytes moved per step, rather than the weights, dominate cost. Long-context question answering and retrieval on two instruction-tuned models provide additional quality evidence. On the tested 8K-token, batch-one, single-layer workload on an NVIDIA A10G, a restricted eight-bit ReadKV reader with a two-bit mean payload-read budget has 39% lower latency than the tested TurboQuant codec.
The Tensor-Memory Equilibrium (TME) model of "FP8 is All You Need (Part 1)" calculates the execution time of Ozaki Scheme II emulation of fp64 as the maximum of a tensor-core term and a High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM) traffic term, plus a per-output reconstruction term. However, it omits the per-input deconstruction cost: every streamed fp64 operand must be scaled, rounded, and reduced modulo each of the $r$ moduli on SIMT pipes before any matrix multiply can issue. In this note we add this fourth term, calibrate its constant from the cuBLAS emulation path, and derive a closed-form operational-intensity threshold $\mathrm{OI}^{*} = c_q r P_{\mathrm{fp64}}/(8P_{\mathrm{int}})$ below which emulation cannot match native fp64 regardless of tensor-core throughput. On the NVIDIA B300 GPU the threshold is $\mathrm{OI}^{*}\approx 0.56$ FLOP/B. As a result, GEMV, SpMV, and low-batch GEMV, which are the memory-bound kernels the original paper claims to accelerate, are limited to 0.3-0.9x of native performance, and the 7-point stencil to 1.8x rather than the claimed 3.1x. Dense GEMM is unaffected as expected. We also show that precomputing and storing the residues moves the same cost into the bandwidth term, and we state the instruction count that an implementation would have to achieve to invalidate the bound.
The latency, power, and area costs of LLC replacement remain poorly explored not because simulators cannot be instrumented--event counters feeding a power model are routine--but because no cost model takes a replacement policy as input. CACTI and McPAT price regular structures, a cache or a core, not the small, oddly shaped arrays and dependent logic a policy is made of, and no event count reveals a victim-selection path's logic depth. Without a model, cost has never been an objective a policy search could optimize. In practice, a policy is first selected in simulation for its IPC, and its cost is reduced later in RTL, after the algorithm is fixed. Cost thus enters the design too late to shape it. This paper asks what happens when cost is present from the start. We build CacheFit, the first policy-design loop for LLC replacement with circuit-level cost inside the search objective. CacheFit connects ChampSim to HARCOM, a circuit-level cost model, and to a large language model that proposes policy variants. Every candidate is scored on latency, area, power, and speedup while its algorithm is still being written. The designer sets the area, power, and latency budgets, and every proposal and every lesson the search learns is stored as readable text that the designer can check and edit. We apply CacheFit to two published policies. From MPPPB, the most expensive baseline in power and transistors, it produces Fit-MPPPB: 60.3% less storage, 56.3% less static power, and 58.9% fewer transistors, with 1.1% higher IPC and a hit rate 7.5 percentage points higher on SPEC CPU2017. From SHiP++, the highest-IPC baseline, it produces Fit-SHiP++: 56% less storage, 61% less static power, and 56% fewer transistors, for 1.54% lower IPC and a hit rate 2.1 points lower. A policy designed with its cost in view can therefore be far cheaper to build at similar or better performance.