Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 | Total: 12
As the significance of Software Engineering (SE) professionals continues to grow in the industry, the adoption of gamification techniques for training purposes has gained traction due to its potential to enhance class appeal through game-derived elements. This paper presents a tertiary study investigating the application of gamification in Software Engineering (SE) education. The study was conducted in response to recent systematic literature reviews and mappings on the topic. The findings reveal that the areas of SE most frequently gamified are Software Testing and Software Quality, with competition and cooperation being the most commonly utilized gamification elements. Additionally, the majority of studies focus on structural gamification, where game elements are employed to modify the learning environment without altering the content. The results demonstrate the potential of gamification to improve students' engagement and motivation throughout the SE learning process, while also impacting other aspects such as performance improvement, skill development, and fostering good SE practices. However, caution is advised as unplanned and incorrectly applied gamification measures may lead to significant declines in performance and motivation. (English Version of the paper in Portuguese available here: HTTP://doi.org/10.1145/3613372.3614193
We investigate the use of Natural Language Inference (NLI) in automating requirements engineering tasks. In particular, we focus on three tasks: requirements classification, identification of requirements specification defects, and detection of conflicts in stakeholders' requirements. While previous research has demonstrated significant benefit in using NLI as a universal method for a broad spectrum of natural language processing tasks, these advantages have not been investigated within the context of software requirements engineering. Therefore, we design experiments to evaluate the use of NLI in requirements analysis. We compare the performance of NLI with a spectrum of approaches, including prompt-based models, conventional transfer learning, Large Language Models (LLMs)-powered chatbot models, and probabilistic models. Through experiments conducted under various learning settings including conventional learning and zero-shot, we demonstrate conclusively that our NLI method surpasses classical NLP methods as well as other LLMs-based and chatbot models in the analysis of requirements specifications. Additionally, we share lessons learned characterizing the learning settings that make NLI a suitable approach for automating requirements engineering tasks.
Quantum computing holds the potential to revolutionize various fields by efficiently tackling complex problems. At its core are quantum circuits, sequences of quantum gates manipulating quantum states. The selection of the right quantum circuit ansatz, which defines initial circuit structures and serves as the basis for optimization techniques, is crucial in quantum algorithm design.This paper presents a categorized catalog of quantum circuit ansatzes aimed at supporting quantum algorithm design and implementation. Each ansatz is described with details such as intent, motivation, applicability, circuit diagram, implementation, example, and see also. Practical examples are provided to illustrate their application in quantum algorithm design.The catalog aims to assist quantum algorithm designers by offering insights into the strengths and limitations of different ansatzes, thereby facilitating decision-making for specific tasks.
6G will revolutionize the software world allowing faster cellular communications and a massive number of connected devices. 6G will enable a shift towards a continuous edge-to-cloud architecture. Current cloud solutions, where all the data is transferred and computed in the cloud, are not sustainable in such a large network of devices. Current technologies, including development methods, software architectures, and orchestration and offloading systems, still need to be prepared to cope with such requirements. In this paper, we conduct a Systematic Mapping Study to investigate the current research status of 6G Software Engineering. Results show that 18 research papers have been proposed in software process, software architecture, orchestration and offloading methods. Of these, software architecture and software-defined networks are respectively areas and topics that have received the most attention in 6G Software Engineering. In addition, the main types of results of these papers are methods, architectures, platforms, frameworks and algorithms. For the five tools/frameworks proposed, they are new and not currently studied by other researchers. The authors of these findings are mainly from China, India and Saudi Arabia. The results will enable researchers and practitioners to further research and extend for 6G Software Engineering.
The rapid advancement of deep learning has led to the development of Large Language Models (LLMs). In the field of vulnerability repair, previous research has leveraged rule-based fixing, pre-trained models, and LLM's prompt engineering. However, existing approaches have limitations in terms of the integration of code structure with error types. Besides, due to certain features of C/C++ language, vulnerability repair in C/C++ proves to be exceptionally challenging. To address these challenges, we propose NAVRepair, a novel framework that combines the node-type information extracted from Abstract Syntax Trees (ASTs) with error types, specifically targeting C/C++ vulnerabilities. Specifically, our approach employs type analysis to localize the minimum edit node (MEN) and customizes context information collection based on different error types. In the offline stage, NAVRepair parses code patches to locate MENs and designs rules to extract relevant contextual information for each MEN type. In the online repairing stage, it analyzes the suspicious code, combines it with vulnerability type templates derived from the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE), and generates targeted repair prompts. We evaluate NAVRepair on multiple popular LLMs and demonstrate its effectiveness in improving the performance of code vulnerability repair. Notably, our framework is independent of any specific LLMs and can quickly adapt to new vulnerability types. Extensive experiments validate that NAVRepair achieves excellent results in assisting LLMs to accurately detect and fix C/C++ vulnerabilities. We achieve a 26% higher accuracy compared to an existing LLM-based C/C++ vulnerability repair method. We believe our node type-aware approach has promising application prospects for enhancing real-world C/C++ code security.
UI-to-code technology has streamlined the front-end development process, reducing repetitive tasks for engineers. prior research mainly use design prototypes as inputs, with the effectiveness of the generated code heavily dependent on these prototypes' quality, leading to compromised robustness. Moreover, these approaches also exhibit shortcomings in code quality, including issues such as disorganized UI structures and the inability to support responsive layouts. To address these challenges, we introduce Prototype2Code, which achieves end-to-end front-end code generation with business demands. For Prototype2Code, we incorporate design linting into the workflow, addressing the detection of fragmented elements and perceptual groups, enhancing the robustness of the generated outcomes. By optimizing the hierarchical structure and intelligently recognizing UI element types, Prototype2Code generates code that is more readable and structurally clearer. To meet responsive design requirements, Prototype2Code primarily supports flexbox layout model, ensuring code compatibility across various device sizes. To validate the efficacy, we compare Prototype2Code with the commercial code generation platform CodeFun and Screenshot-to-code based on GPT-4 with vision. Employing structural similarity index measure (SSIM), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and mean squared error (MSE) for visual similarity assessment, Prototype2Code's rendered UI effects align most closely with the design prototypes, exhibiting the minimal errors. We also conduct a user study with five experienced front-end engineers, inviting them to review and revise code generated by the three methods. As a result, Prototype2Code surpasses other methods in readability, usability, and maintainability, better meeting the business needs of industrial development.
With the rapid development of deep learning, the implementation of intricate algorithms and substantial data processing have become standard elements of deep learning projects. As a result, the code has become progressively complex as the software evolves, which is difficult to maintain and understand. Existing studies have investigated the impact of refactoring on software quality within traditional software. However, the insight of code refactoring in the context of deep learning is still unclear. This study endeavors to fill this knowledge gap by empirically examining the current state of code refactoring in deep learning realm, and practitioners' views on refactoring. We first manually analyzed the commit history of five popular and well-maintained deep learning projects (e.g., PyTorch). We mined 4,921 refactoring practices in historical commits and measured how different types and elements of refactoring operations are distributed and found that refactoring operation types' distribution in deep learning projects is different from it in traditional Java software. We then surveyed 159 practitioners about their views of code refactoring in deep learning projects and their expectations of current refactoring tools. The result of the survey showed that refactoring research and the development of related tools in the field of deep learning are crucial for improving project maintainability and code quality, and that current refactoring tools do not adequately meet the needs of practitioners. Lastly, we provided our perspective on the future advancement of refactoring tools and offered suggestions for developers' development practices.
This paper presents the first concolic testing framework specifically designed for quantum programs. The framework defines quantum conditional statements that quantify quantum states and presents a symbolization method for quantum variables. Utilizing this framework, we generate path constraints for each concrete execution path of a quantum program. These constraints guide the exploration of new paths, with a quantum constraint solver determining the outcomes to generate novel input samples and enhance branch coverage. We implemented this framework in Python and integrated it with Qiskit for practical evaluation. Experimental results demonstrate that our concolic testing framework significantly improves branch coverage and the quality of quantum input samples, demonstrating its effectiveness and efficiency in quantum software testing.
Context: Research on human aspects within the field of software engineering (SE) has been steadily gaining prominence in recent years. These human aspects have a significant impact on SE due to the inherently interactive and collaborative nature of the discipline. Objective: In this paper, we present a systematic literature review (SLR) on human aspects affecting developer-user interactions. The objective of this SLR is to plot the current landscape of primary studies by examining the human aspects that influence developer-user interactions, their implications, interrelationships, and how existing studies address these implications. Method: We conducted this SLR following the guidelines proposed by Kitchenham et al. We performed a comprehensive search in six digital databases, and an exhaustive backward and forward snowballing process. We selected 46 primary studies for data extraction. Results: We identified various human aspects affecting developer-user interactions in SE, assessed their interrelationships, identified their positive impacts and mitigation strategies for negative effects. We present specific recommendations derived from the identified research gaps. Conclusion: Our findings suggest the importance of leveraging positive effects and addressing negative effects in developer-user interactions through the implementation of effective mitigation strategies. These insights may benefit software practitioners for effective user interactions, and the recommendations proposed by this SLR may aid the research community in further human aspects related studies.
Background: Since Google introduced Kotlin as an official programming language for developing Android apps in 2017, Kotlin has gained widespread adoption in Android development. The interoperability of Java and Kotlin's design nature allows them to coexist and interact with each other smoothly within a project. Aims: However, there is limited research on how Java and Kotlin interact with each other in real-world projects and what challenges are faced during these interactions. The answers to these questions are key to understanding these kinds of cross-language software systems. Methods: In this paper, we implemented a tool named DependExtractor, which can extract 11 kinds of Kotlin-Java dependencies, and conducted an empirical study of 23 Kotlin-Java real-world projects with 3,227 Java and 8,630 Kotlin source files. Results: Our findings revealed that Java and Kotlin frequently interact with each other in these cross-language projects, with access and call dependency types being the most dominant. Compared to files interacting with other files in the same language, Java/Kotlin source files, which participate in the cross-language interactions, undergo more commits. Additionally, among all Kotlin-Java problematic interactions, we identified seven common mistakes, along with their fixing strategies. Conclusions: The findings of this study can help developers understand and address the challenges in Kotlin-Java projects.
Large language models have made substantial progress in addressing diverse code-related tasks. However, their adoption is hindered by inconsistencies in generating output due to the lack of real-world, domain-specific information, such as for intra-repository API calls for unseen software projects. We introduce a novel technique to mitigate hallucinations by leveraging global and local contextual information within a code repository for API completion tasks. Our approach is tailored to refine code completion tasks, with a focus on optimizing local API completions. We examine relevant import statements during API completion to derive insights into local APIs, drawing from their method signatures. For API token completion, we analyze the inline variables and correlate them with the appropriate imported modules, thereby allowing our approach to rank the most contextually relevant suggestions from the available local APIs. Further, for conversational API completion, we gather APIs that are most relevant to the developer query with a retrieval-based search across the project. We employ our tool, LANCE, within the framework of our proposed benchmark, APIEval, encompassing two different programming languages. Our evaluation yields an average accuracy of 82.6% for API token completion and 76.9% for conversational API completion tasks. On average, LANCE surpasses Copilot by 143% and 142% for API token completion and conversational API completion, respectively. The implications of our findings are substantial for developers, suggesting that our lightweight context analysis can be applied to multilingual environments without language-specific training or fine-tuning, allowing for efficient implementation with minimal examples and effort.
IT Governance systems are increasingly required to keep todays organizations functioning. IT Governance requires a holistic system of interacting components, including processes, organizational structures, information, and others. Performance management of IT Governance systems is of utmost importance to maintain their effectiveness. Capability models are used to assess and manage IT Governance process performance, whereas similar mechanisms are lacking for other types of IT Governance system components, e.g. information. In this paper, we focus on how to define the quality of IT Governance information, as a proxy for the performance of the information component of the IT Governance system. Using a Design Science approach, we iteratively develop, based on theory, and empirically evaluate, based on expert validation, a reference model for IT Governance information quality, i.e., the Information Quality Reference Model that can be used for assessing the quality of IT Governance information items. The model is comprehensive yet manageable and provides a basis for building a capability model for IT Governance information.