2026-05-07 | | Total: 12
Automation raises productivity and reduces paid human labor, but it also reallocates income and ownership claims. This paper studies that tradeoff in a static benchmark and in a stationary heterogeneous-agent general equilibrium. Firms choose automation from a profit function. Households differ by skill and wealth, save in a capital/equity claim, and face incomplete insurance. Wages and returns are determined by market clearing from a Cobb--Douglas final-good firm, while the wealth distribution is pinned down by a Hamilton--Jacobi--Bellman (HJB) equation and a Kolmogorov forward equation (KFE). The paper is deliberately two-sided. With strong productivity growth, high-skill complementarity, low obsolescence, and broad ownership, automation raises output, capital, and consumption. With strong exposure of low-wealth, high-marginal-propensity-to-consume (high-MPC) households and concentrated ownership, privately chosen automation can be excessive even though it raises high-skilled labor income. The central object is the derivative of household consumption demand and collective wage bill with respect to automation. Fiscal policy is modeled as a government problem rather than as an abstract planner: a tax changes the firm's automation first-order condition, raises revenue only on the remaining automation base, and must specify rebates and administrative losses.
This paper develops a difference-in-differences (DiD) estimation method that selects the optimal length of pre-trends by minimizing the mean squared error (MSE). Conventional DiD regression models, such as the two-way fixed effects model or the event study model, may suffer from accuracy and validity concerns. If the sample size is small, the estimator may have a larger variance. Also, pre-tests often lack power to detect violations of the parallel trends assumption as Roth (2022) highlights. By focusing on the bias and variance tradeoff, the proposed method derives the MSE-optimal estimator from the optimal length of pre-trends. Simulation results and an empirical application demonstrate the practical applicability of the proposed method.
We study the estimation of average effects in nonlinear panel data models with fixed effects when the time dimension $T$ is only moderately large. Our approach, called approximate operator inversion (AOI), offers a new perspective on bias correction. Instead of first estimating unit-specific fixed effects and then correcting the resulting plug-in bias, AOI approximately inverts the likelihood-induced mapping from the fixed-effect distribution to the outcome distribution. AOI can be interpreted as the limit of an infinitely iterated bias correction scheme, and this limit is available in closed form. We show that the bias of the AOI estimator has a rate double robustness property and converges to zero at an exponential rate in $T$ under regularity conditions. Our asymptotic theory requires $T \to \infty$, but the exponential convergence rate of the bias means that finite-sample performance is very good even for moderately large $T$. We establish asymptotic normality and provide feasible inference.
This paper develops efficient GMM estimation when the moment conditions are misspecified. We observe that the influence function of the standard GMM estimator under misspecification depends on both the original moment conditions and their Jacobian, motivating a new class of estimators based on augmented moment conditions with recentering. The standard GMM estimator is a special case within this class, and generally suboptimal. By optimally weighting the augmented system, we obtain a misspecification-efficient (ME) estimator with the smallest asymptotic variance for the same GMM pseudo-true value. In linear models, the asymptotic variance of ME estimator reduces to the textbook efficient-GMM variance formula $(G'W^{*}G)^{-1}$, where $W^{*}$ is the inverse of the variance of residualized moments after projection on the Jacobian $G$. We consider a feasible double-recentered bootstrap estimator, which can be considered as a misspecification-robust and efficient version of Hall and Horowitz (1996) recentered bootstrap GMM estimator, and also consider a split-sample ME estimator. Finally, we establish uniform local asymptotic minimax bounds over a class of weighting matrices. We illustrate the proposed methods in simulation and empirical examples.
This paper develops a method to use singles' data in a non-parametric revealed preference setting of collective household choice. We use it to test the controversial assumption of preference stability between singles and couples, without data on intra-household allocation or marital transitions. We show that, under the preference-stability hypothesis, consumption choices from an endogenously matched population admit a conditional random-utility representation over counterfactual pairings of couples and singles. Preference stability is testable as a feasibility restriction on the observed marginal choice distributions. We reject the hypothesis using consumption data from the Dutch LISS, the Russian RLMS, and the Spanish ECPF panels.
Interaction effects are often economically central in environments where structural dynamic estimation becomes computationally infeasible. Under fixed group membership and sparse within-group interaction structure, the Bellman operator admits a block-diagonal decomposition that allows high-dimensional dynamic programs to be solved through independent group-level subproblems while preserving the original structural problem exactly. The result applies to a class of dynamic discrete choice models in which interactions are confined within stable local groups and state transitions depend only on within-group conditions. We apply the framework to replacement decisions across 14,344 GPU node locations in the Titan supercomputer, where operating environments differ systematically across cage positions. The structural estimates reveal significant spatial coordination: both neighboring failures and recent local replacement activity increase replacement incentives. Accounting for these interaction effects materially shifts predicted replacement timing and reveals significant misoptimization costs in benchmarks that assume conditional independence. More broadly, the results show how exploiting sparsity in interaction structures can make fully structural estimation feasible in large-scale networked systems without relying on simulation-based auxiliary moments or numerical approximation.
We study a contest-theoretic model of adversarial investment in which an attacker and a defender allocate resources to AI-augmented capabilities across multiple attack surfaces. The attacker's investment operates through two channels: it amplifies offensive potency unconditionally and erodes defensive effectiveness conditionally, generating an adversarial discount that deepens endogenously with the defender's own investment. We derive a closed-form arms race ratio decomposing the relative marginal effectiveness of offensive and defensive investment into six structural primitives and establish equilibrium uniqueness and global convergence under a continuous best-response dynamic. The central result concerns signal cross-correlation, the degree to which threat intelligence on one surface informs detection on another. With full cross-correlation, the arms race ratio is independent of the number of attack surfaces: the attacker's structural advantage from surface proliferation is completely neutralized. Under the benchmark full-dilution case, without cross-correlation, per-surface defense effectiveness vanishes as the attack surface grows. Extending the analysis to heterogeneous defenders facing an attacker who targets by expected value, we argue that the model points to a dual inefficiency: overinvestment in private defense (a zero-sum redirective externality) and underinvestment in shared signal correlation (a public good). These formal results, together with public-good reasoning outside the base model, characterize when collective information aggregation can dominate private capability investment as the decisive margin in adversarial contests.
The impact of lithium isotopic enrichment on the global deployment of nuclear fusion energy is analysed. Lithium - the 6Li isotope in particular - is essentially one of two elemental fuels required by fusion reactors for tritium breeding. Whilst variable consumption of lithium is low enough to present negligible cost, it is instead the large stored inventory volume (50-100 tonnes) and its required enrichment that compound to significantly drive capital costs. These costs are driven by the inefficiency of the tritium breeding process, making this challenge fundamental to almost all fusion power plant concepts. Financing would further compound these effects, making lithium fusion fuels more akin to an upfront capital expenditure than operational expenditure. Other potential barriers to fusion deployment created by lithium are also discussed: enrichment technologies of today are shown to be too expensive, not scalable, and environmentally risky, and highly enriched 6Li is a controlled substance. Mitigating actions include: developing alternative enrichment technologies that are affordable, scalable, and do not rely on mercury; incorporating lithium enrichment as an explicit cost driver in reactor design processes, producing more compact reactors with smaller lithium inventories; establishing distinct enrichment levels to enable supply chain monitoring for misuse; and the most radical solution: breeding blankets that use natural, unenriched lithium. These actions may impact tritium breeding capabilities, which calls for an urgent re-assessment of the tritium breeding paradigm. Whatever solution is sought, lithium supply is a mission-critical issue that needs urgently addressing.
We propose DAO-enabled decentralized physical AI (DePAI), a democratic architecture for coordinating humans and autonomous machines in the operation and governance of physical-digital systems. We (1) synthesize foundations in blockchains, decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), and cryptoeconomics; (2) connect DAO design with digital-democracy research on deliberation and voting, showing how each can advance the other; (3) position DAO-governed decentralized physical infrastructure networks (DePIN) within a vertically integrated stack that links energy and sensing to connectivity, storage/compute, models, and robots; (4) show how these elements specify workflows that couple machine execution with human oversight, enabling enhanced self-organization of techno-socio-economic systems, which we call DePAI; and (5) analyze risks, including security, centralization, incentive failure, legal exposure, and the crowding-out of intrinsic motivation, and argue for value-sensitive design and continuously adaptive governance. DePAI offers a path to scalable, resilient self-organization that integrates physical infrastructure, AI, and community ownership under transparent rules, on-chain incentives, and permissionless participation, aiming to preserve human autonomy.
This research establishes ESG as a state dependent insurance mechanism against equity crashes by addressing the decoupling of unconditional alpha from tail risk resilience. By validating market stress regimes as distinct economic states through a drawdown-based truncation rule, the study demonstrates that high ESG ratings materially reduce the incidence of discrete crash events during systemic drawdowns. To address the selection bias and high-dimensional confounding inherent in traditional linear frameworks, we implement Double Machine Learning as a structural deconfounding layer. Unlike simple predictive modeling, the Double Machine Learning framework utilizes machine learning to handle complex nuisance parameters, allowing us to isolate the asymmetric treatment effects of ESG across different market states. Distributional analysis reveals the underlying mechanism as ESG specifically attenuates the severity of realized tail losses at the most adverse quantiles instead of shifting the entire return distribution. Confirmed by structural estimates, this protection functions as priced insurance that incurs performance drags during stable periods while providing critical resilience when tail risks are most acute.
We study contextual dynamic pricing under a semiparametric demand model in which the purchase probability is $1-F(p-m(\mathbf{x}))$, where $m(\mathbf{x})$ captures mean utility as a function of product features and buyer covariates, and $F$ is an unknown market-noise distribution. Existing methods either incur suboptimal regret or rely on restrictive structural assumptions. We propose a stagewise greedy pricing algorithm that iteratively refines the estimate of $F$ via local polynomial regression while pricing greedily with current estimates. By exploiting feature diversity, the algorithm reuses endogenous samples collected during exploitation for nonparametric estimation, avoiding costly global random exploration used in prior work. We establish a general regret bound that applies to any estimator $\hat m$ of the utility function, and derive explicit rates for linear, nonparametric additive, and sparse linear classes of $m$. For the linear class, our regret scales as $T^{\max\{1/2,\,3/(2β+1)\}}$, where $β$ is the smoothness of $F$ and $T$ is the time horizon. This improves the best known rates for semiparametric contextual pricing and achieves the parametric $\sqrt{T}$ rate when $β\ge 5/2$. We further prove a matching lower bound, showing the optimality of our rate, and present numerical experiments that corroborate the theory and demonstrate the practical advantages of iterative refinement.
Modern heterogeneity-robust difference-in-differences estimators derive their asymptotic properties under iid, cluster, or fixed-design frameworks that abstract from complex survey sampling, yet practitioners routinely apply them to nationally representative surveys with stratified cluster designs. We show that, under standard regularity conditions, the influence functions of each smooth IF-based or regression-based modern DiD estimator satisfy Binder's (1983) smoothness conditions, so the standard stratified-cluster variance formula applied to their values produces design-consistent standard errors. A Monte Carlo study with 66,000 replications shows where the design effect comes from. HC1 standard errors that treat observations as iid produce coverage as low as 34% under a baseline survey design and below 11% under informative sampling. Combining the survey-weighted point estimate with PSU-level clustering - the practitioner's cluster=psu heuristic - recovers near-nominal coverage across all scenarios. Adding strata and finite-population corrections yields incremental precision but is not required for valid coverage. Survey-weighted doubly robust estimation produces well-calibrated inference when parallel trends hold only conditionally. An NHANES illustration of the ACA dependent coverage provision shows that point estimates and standard errors change substantively - enough to reverse significance conclusions - when the survey design is accounted for. We provide diff-diff (https://github.com/igerber/diff-diff), an open-source Python package implementing design-based variance for fifteen modern DiD estimators.