2026-04-15 | | Total: 15
This study analyzes the impacts of exchange rate and inflation on exports in Turkiye. Annual data for the period 1995-2023 were used in the analysis. The Johansen cointegration analysis and Dynamic Least Squares (DOLS) method were employed in the study. Identifying the cointegration relationship enabled the estimation of the long-run coefficients. The results show that an increase in the real effective exchange rate (appreciation of the Turkish lira) and inflation reduce exports with coefficients of -0.185 and -0.125, respectively. Foreign direct investment and imports, added to the study as control variables, have a positive impact on exports with coefficients of 0.117 and 0.849, respectively. These findings indicate that exchange rate stability and inflation control are priorities for improving foreign trade performance. Furthermore, policies that increase foreign direct investment and strategically manage imports complement this process.
We develop a Quantile Bayesian Vector Autoregression (QBVAR) to forecast real oil prices across different quantiles of the conditional distribution. The model allows predictor effects to vary across quantiles, capturing asymmetries that standard mean-focused approaches miss. Using monthly data from 1975 to 2025, we document three findings. First, the QBVAR improves median forecasts by 2-5\% relative to Bayesian VARs, demonstrating that quantile-specific dynamics matter even for point prediction. Second, uncertainty and financial condition variables strongly predict downside risk, with left-tail forecast improvements of 10-25\% that intensify during crisis episodes. Third, right-tail forecasting remains difficult; stochastic volatility models dominate for upside risk, though forecast combinations that include the QBVAR recover these losses. The results show that modeling the conditional distribution yields substantial gains for tail risk assessment, particularly during major oil market disruptions.
Difference-in-Differences (DiD) is a widely used research design that often relies on a conditional parallel trends (CPT) assumption. In contrast to settings with unconfoundedness, where causal graphs provide powerful frameworks for reasoning about valid conditioning variables, general-purpose graphical tools for CPT are missing. We introduce transformed Single World Intervention Graphs (SWIGs), the $Δ$-SWIGs, and prove that they enable us to read off conditional independencies via $d$-separation that imply CPT. Using $Δ$-SWIGs, we study valid conditioning strategies for DiD in complex settings with multiple periods and time-varying covariates. We show that when time-varying covariates affect the outcome, controlling for post-treatment variables is required for identification. However, even when such controls are included, pre-treatment parallel trends are only informative about a subset of the assumptions required for unbiased post-treatment effects, highlighting the limitations of purely empirical justifications of CPT.
Empirical analyses often compare distributions of ordinal variables across groups or over time using repeated cross-sectional data, where only marginal distributions are observed and missing data are pervasive. As a result, the joint distribution linking these marginals is not identified, making it difficult to assess how observed differences arise. This paper studies how distributional change can be measured and interpreted under such limited information. I show that the $L_1$ distance between cumulative distribution functions admits an optimal transport representation as the minimal reallocation of probability mass across ordered categories. This representation delivers both a scalar measure of discrepancy and a structured description of how distributional change must occur, which I refer to as minimal-mobility configurations. To address missing data, I adopt a partial identification approach and construct sharp bounds on the marginal distributions. These bounds induce identified sets for both the discrepancy measure and the associated minimal-mobility configurations, providing inference that is robust to nonresponse and a transparent basis for assessing sensitivity to missing data. An empirical illustration using data from the \emph{Arab Barometer} demonstrates how the framework can be used in practice to quantify and interpret distributional change under limited information.
In the face of socioeconomic challenges, this paper develops and empirically demonstrates the Gondauri Index (GI) as a reproducible diagnostics-first composite framework for benchmarking macro-financial resilience across heterogeneous economies on a unified 0-100 scale. The GI addresses a key limitation of conventional surveillance dashboards: resilience is multi-dimensional and only partially substitutable, so strength in one area cannot sustainably offset fragility in another. The index integrates three interpretable pillars: Inequality Resilience Score (IRS), Liquidity and Systemic Resilience (LNSR), and Inflation Forecast Coherence (IFC). Cross-country comparability is ensured through robust percentile normalization (p5-p95), a consistent annual country-year design, and explicit missing-data handling via component-level weight renormalization. Empirically, the paper provides a 2024 benchmark snapshot and dynamic evidence for 2005-2024 using 5-year rolling diagnostics and Delta log(GI) contribution decomposition, allowing transparent attribution of resilience changes to pillar-level drivers. A forward-looking extension constructs 2026-2030 scenario pathways and introduces a binding-pillar diagnostic that identifies the dominant constraint on resilience across horizons. Overall, the GI offers a scalable tool for comparative resilience assessment, early-warning diagnostics, and evidence-based policy sequencing.
Many matching markets feature unknown, dynamic arrivals of agents that must match immediately. A caseworker must match an abused child to a foster home, a hospital must assign a patient in critical condition to a room, or a city must place a homeless individual into a shelter. We design an online matching algorithm -- the Sequential Equilibrium Mechanism (SEM) -- that approximates large market equilibria to match arriving agents to objects. SEM is asymptotically efficient, fair, and strategy-proof with probability one. Our application plans to deploy a lab-in-the-field experiment where real caseworkers match vulnerable children to host homes, and we provide simulation evidence that SEM can substantially improve welfare.
This paper bridges social security design and general equilibrium theory to conceive optimally balanced pay-as-you-go systems. The design is based on the backward calculation algorithm from Dognini (2025), which is used to find optimal monetary equilibria of prone-to-savings non-stationary overlapping generations economies with heterogeneous households. In particular, this algorithm makes the design applicable for reforming pay-as-you-go systems in countries undergoing demographic transitions. Due to households balanced budgets under equilibrium prices (i.e., Walras' law), these optimally balanced pay-as-you-go systems resemble the well-known notional accounts systems. The design is illustrated in a simplified framework using the past and forecast demographic and productivity dynamics of Brazil, China, India, Italy, and the United States from 1950 to 2070.
What drives cross-state differences in U.S. energy consumption? We combine LMDI decomposition, stochastic frontier analysis, and variable-importance methods on a panel of 50 states plus DC over the 2006--2022 period. The observed 12.8% decline in per capita energy use is driven almost entirely by intensity improvements. A variance decomposition attributes 63% of cross-state variation in log energy use to the demand frontier, 34\% to inefficiency above it, and 3% to noise. Within the frontier, energy prices account for roughly 26% of cross-state variation and state efficiency policies for about 13%, while GDP and climate together explain only around 10\%. Efficiency policies also operate through a second channel by reducing inefficiency, adding a further 6 percentage points to their total contribution. The results suggest that pricing and regulation are the primary drivers of cross-state energy use differences.
This paper proposes a two-step empirical framework to study the repricing of the Brazilian DI curve around Copom-related events. The empirical strategy separates the initial market reaction associated with the underlying shock from the subsequent repricing observed between the shock and the first Copom statement that follows it. The dataset combines a hand-built event calendar, daily market data, Focus expectations, and structured textual features extracted from Copom statements, including tone, forward-guidance direction and explicitness, and uncertainty indicators. In the updated sample, 59 events retain both analytical windows, allowing the second stage to include the full set of same-day Copom events. Baseline results suggest that the framework is most informative at the front and intermediate sections of the curve, especially for the DI 252d maturity, for which the baseline OLS specification reaches an in-sample R2 of about 0.43. By contrast, explanatory power is materially weaker for the DI 504d maturity and for slope adjustments, and out-of-sample performance remains limited. The textual variables display economically plausible signs, but their statistical contribution is not uniformly robust across specifications. The main contribution of the paper is therefore methodological and applied: it offers an implementable event-based decomposition for assessing how shocks and Copom communication jointly shape curve dynamics in Brazil.
Predicting counterfactual outcomes in longitudinal data, where sequential treatment decisions heavily depend on evolving patient states, is critical yet notoriously challenging due to complex time-dependent confounding and inadequate uncertainty quantification in existing methods. We introduce the Causal Diffusion Model (CDM), the first denoising diffusion probabilistic approach explicitly designed to generate full probabilistic distributions of counterfactual outcomes under sequential interventions. CDM employs a novel residual denoising architecture with relational self-attention, capturing intricate temporal dependencies and multimodal outcome trajectories without requiring explicit adjustments (e.g., inverse-probability weighting or adversarial balancing) for confounding. In rigorous evaluation on a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic tumor-growth simulator widely adopted in prior work, CDM consistently outperforms state-of-the-art longitudinal causal inference methods, achieving a 15-30% relative improvement in distributional accuracy (1-Wasserstein distance) while maintaining competitive or superior point-estimate accuracy (RMSE) under high-confounding regimes. By unifying uncertainty quantification and robust counterfactual prediction in complex, sequentially confounded settings, without tailored deconfounding, CDM offers a flexible, high-impact tool for decision support in medicine, policy evaluation, and other longitudinal domains.
Both cluster randomized trials and quasi-experimental designs are used to evaluate the impact of health and social policies and interventions. Stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials randomize a staggered adoption approach, while recent difference-in-differences methods allow analysis of non-randomized settings where similar policies are adopted at different time points. These approaches have become common, but the sheer variety of methods for analyzing observational studies with staggered adoption makes it challenging to clearly design and report such studies. We propose that observational and quasi-experimental study investigators can address these challenges by emulating stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials in the target trial emulation framework. The conceptual framework and reporting standards of trial emulation will encourage consideration of key features of these designs, such as policy heterogeneity and time-varying effects, and clear reporting of the estimand and assumptions. It also highlights areas where those interested in randomized trials and quasi-experimental designs can benefit from one another's experience by bringing insights across disciplines. Questions of treatment effect heterogeneity, power, spillovers, and anticipation effects, among others, are common to both fields and can benefit from cross-pollination. This article also demonstrates how trial emulation can identify settings that are not well-served by either approach, thereby avoiding studies unlikely to generate high-quality causal evidence. Finally, it informs the bias-variance-generalizability trade-off that arises with design and analysis choices made in these settings, supporting better evidence generation and interpretation in settings where important questions can be answered.
When variable selection methods are applied to bootstrapped and multiply imputed datasets, the set of selected variables typically varies across iterations. Aggregating results via the union rule can lead to overly dense models. We propose a sequential evidence aggregation procedure that models detection outcomes across perturbation iterations as Bernoulli trials and accumulates evidence for variable relevance through a likelihood-ratio process admitting an approximate Bayes-factor interpretation. The procedure provides both a variable inclusion criterion and a stopping rule that eliminates the need to fix the number of bootstrap-imputation iterations ex ante. A Monte Carlo study across 126 scenarios and an empirical illustration demonstrate the method's performance relative to existing aggregation approaches.
This paper proposes a dynamic network framework for uncovering latent community paths in high-dimensional VAR-type models. By embedding a degree-corrected stochastic co-blockmodel (ScBM) into the transition matrices of VAR-type systems, we separate sending and receiving roles at the node level and summarize complex directional dependence in an interpretable low-dimensional form. Our method integrates directed spectral co-clustering with eigenvector smoothing to track how directional groups split, merge, or persist over time. This framework accommodates both periodic VAR (PVAR) models for cyclical seasonal evolution and generalized VHAR models for structural transitions across ordered dependence horizons. We establish non-asymptotic misclassification bounds for both procedures and provide supporting evidence through Monte Carlo experiments. Applications to U.S.\ nonfarm payrolls distinguish a recurrent business-centered core from more mobile, seasonally sensitive sectors. In global stock volatilities, the results reveal a compact U.S.-centered long-horizon block, a Europe-heavy developed core, and a more dynamic short-horizon reallocation of peripheral and bridge markets.
Policy-Relevant Treatment Effects (PRTEs) are generally not point-identified under standard instrumental variable (IV) assumptions when the instrument generates limited support in treatment propensity. Existing approaches typically optimize over marginal treatment response functions subject to moment restrictions and can discard identifying distributional information. We show that PRTE partial identification in the generalized Roy model can instead be formulated as a Constrained Conditional Optimal Transport (CCOT) problem. The resulting multidimensional CCOT problem reduces analytically to separable one-dimensional OT problems with product costs, yielding sharp closed-form bounds and avoiding direct solution of the original high-dimensional CCOT problem. We also develop estimation and inference procedures for these bounds: for discrete instruments, a Double Machine Learning (DML) approach based on Neyman-orthogonal scores that accommodates high-dimensional covariates while achieving the parametric $\sqrt{n}$ rate and asymptotic normality; for continuous instruments, we explicitly characterize the corresponding nonparametric convergence rates. The framework accommodates covariates, discrete and continuous instruments, and extensions to general treatment settings. In simulations and a bed-net subsidy application, the resulting bounds are substantially tighter than existing moment-relaxation methods.
Battery energy storage systems (BESS) participating in multi-market electricity trading require price forecasts to optimize dispatch decisions. A widely held assumption is that forecast accuracy, measured by standard metrics such as mean absolute error (MAE), drives trading performance. We challenge this assumption using a hierarchical three-layer optimization system trading simultaneously on frequency containment reserve (FCR), automatic frequency restoration reserve (aFRR), day-ahead, and continuous intraday (XBID) markets in Germany and Switzerland over 2020-2025, with real market data from Regelleistung.net and Swissgrid. We find that rank correlation (Kendall tau), rather than MAE, is the primary predictor of intraday dispatch value: forecasts above an empirical threshold of tau approximately 0.85-0.95 capture up to 97-100% of perfect-foresight revenue, while persistence forecasts with near-zero tau capture only 33%. This threshold is stable across market regimes and volatility levels, and reflects the ordinal structure of the dispatch problem. Furthermore, under reserve market constraints, FCR capacity revenue exceeds XBID by 6.5x per MW, making capacity allocation -- not forecast accuracy -- the primary driver of total revenue. In the Swiss market, hydrological surplus anomalies are significantly associated with balancing market revenue (p = 0.0005), a mechanism absent from existing German-focused literature. These findings reframe forecast evaluation for BESS operators: the relevant question is not what the MAE is, but whether the forecast achieves tau-sufficiency.