2026-06-17 | | Total: 14
This paper studies how long-run earthquake risk shapes national identity, separating a distributive margin (national membership as a rule for allocating scarce resources) from an expressive margin (pride, willingness to fight, and affective attachment). Linking World Values Survey respondents (1981-2022; 63 countries, 494 subnational regions) to subnational seismic-risk geography, I find that people living closer to high-risk zones express stronger national in-group orientation: more pride, more willingness to fight, and more priority for nationals when jobs are scarce. Family attachment and out-group hostility do not rise, while religiosity increases in parallel. The expressive margin is conditional: the pride response is pronounced where state-religion alignment and a cohesive religious field lend the symbolic infrastructure to cast disaster as a shared national ordeal, and indistinguishable from zero where they do not. A complementary design exploiting earthquakes between adjacent survey waves finds no average short-run response, yet the response it does detect concentrates among older, place-attached residents who cannot leave -- consistent with attitudes tracking a chronic, inescapable risk rather than single events. Together, the results point to a demand-side origin of national attachment: where a covariate shock would overwhelm local and family insurance, people turn to larger communities of protection and meaning -- the nation and religion -- a logic I formalize in a simple social-interaction model.
In difference-in-differences designs, the parallel trends assumption requires that the outcome gap between treated and control units would have remained flat absent treatment. Pre-treatment event studies frequently reject this flat-gap requirement. Existing responses include parametric trend controls and bounds on the treatment effect under assumptions about the magnitude of the violation. This paper shows that point identification of cohort-specific and aggregate treatment effects in staggered designs remains achievable under strictly weaker assumptions. I replace the flat-gap requirement with a hierarchy of higher-order conditions, Parallel[p], embed this framework in the group-time average treatment effect structure of Callaway and Sant'Anna (2021), and prove an aggregation theorem for the case where different cohorts are identified under different feasible polynomial orders, a challenge unique to staggered designs that has not been previously addressed. A sequential order-selection procedure guides applied practice. Monte Carlo evidence confirms that post-selection bootstrap coverage remains near-nominal and that inference is robust to realistic serial correlation. Applied to Medicaid expansion data, the method yields point estimates resting on an assumption the pre-treatment data do not reject, in contrast to the flat-gap requirement which those same data decisively reject.
Despite near-universal electrification in many countries, electricity supply shortages continue to shape household energy use. This paper examines how households adapt to chronic grid failure in high-electrification, high-dependence contexts, using Lebanon as a case study. Drawing on original survey data from 1,000 households, we analyze both supply-side coping mechanisms such as diesel generators and solar photovoltaic (PV)-battery systems, and demand-side adaptations, including load shifting and demand suppression. The results reveal a landscape of household responses, where socioeconomic status plays a central role in determining access to backup solutions and the extent of met demand. While diesel generators remain widespread, a transition toward PV-battery systems is observed, especially among financially capable households. However, decentralized self-generation is associated with inefficiencies, including substantial levels of curtailed solar generation. On the demand side, households exhibit reductions in electricity use, leading to distinct consumption profiles depending on the type of backup system employed. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing between met and unmet demand when assessing energy needs under unreliable supply. The paper contributes to the literature by providing a quantitative characterization of the interaction between self-generation and demand adaptation in a supply-constrained high-electrification context. It also offers empirical demand profiles that incorporate suppressed consumption, addressing a key gap in electricity system planning. From a policy perspective, the results underscore the need to account for unmet demand, address inequities in access to coping technologies, and reduce inefficiencies in decentralized systems.
Prediction markets are usually evaluated after their contracts exist, by asking how well prices forecast outcomes. We study the prior institutional margin of market formation, asking which uncertainties become tradable contracts at all. Using an audited dataset of 6,047 Africa-topic and Latin America-topic contracts listed on Polymarket and Kalshi, we construct a coded measure of settlement legibility, the degree to which an uncertainty can be worded, sourced, and credibly resolved by third parties, and validate it on 451 units under a frozen codebook, where independent double scoring reaches ordinal reliabilities of 0.92 and 0.96 on the primary dimensions and blind human benchmarks reach 0.97 and 0.92. Using this measure, we find that formation is selective in ways that public importance does not explain, with African inventory concentrated overwhelmingly in football while salient civic events produce little or no inventory, and Latin American inventory deeper but dominated by Venezuela, where attention to prospective United States military action sustains the largest civic cluster in the data. Legibility orders the inventory steeply, with sports and elections near the top of the scale and conflict at the bottom. In a formation test against an externally assembled frame of 131 civic events, legibility predicts listing in the expected direction but falls short of pre-specified acceptance criteria, while among listed contracts the relation between legibility and trading value is negative, as a model of selective listing implies and as we predicted before estimation. Prediction-market inventories therefore measure what platforms can settle as much as what traders believe, and reading them as maps of public interest conflates the two.
How should recommender systems be designed when recommendations shape access to scarce, short-lived opportunities? We study this question in a production setting: Timee, Japan's largest platform for spot work, where workers favorite job templates and receive notifications when firms post shifts from those templates. Maximizing predicted favoriting can generate misdirected concentration: recommendations accumulate on popular templates that create few viable job openings, while templates with unmet labor demand receive too little exposure. We design exposure-control mechanisms for favorite-list management, reallocating template exposure based on posting activity and unfilled capacity. The proposed recommender, thresholded eligibility control (TEC), is fully parallelizable and suitable for large-scale digital platforms. In simulations calibrated to Timee data, TEC raises the per-round job-finding rate from 57.6\% to 70.0\%. A prefecture-level randomized field experiment increases realized matches and exposure per active template, reduces the share of low-exposure templates, and improves impression-level favoriting and downstream matching.
Private Property is one of the central institutions of civilized society. We first consider its social, legal, and economic aspects. We then follow the Lockean tradition by focusing on a specific procedural definition: Homesteading is the acquisitive act of first using an object that is initially unowned. The ontology of concrete objects and the nature of their uses determine how objects may be acquired. In this article, we address the open-texture problem in the definition of property, then provide the necessary conditions for an object to be property in the Lockean Scheme.
Climate policy in global network industries is implemented across fragmented jurisdictions, yet firms respond through integrated operational networks. We develop a two-stage game-theoretic framework to analyze how firm-level responses interact with alternative governance structures. Regulators first choose emissions charges. Firms subsequently compete through pricing, service capacity and capital deployment decisions. The analytical results demonstrate that uniform global regulation maximizes welfare in symmetric markets. However, in sufficiently asymmetric markets, a uniform global charge is dominated by decentralized regimes. Multiple regulatory instruments better accommodate region-specific market externalities. We apply this framework to a calibrated case study of North American, Western European and transatlantic aviation markets. The numerical results establish that a globally coordinated regulator setting region-specific charges achieves the highest aggregate welfare. These aggregate gains nonetheless mask substantial distributional disparities across jurisdictions. Effective climate governance in network industries therefore requires more than determining an efficient emissions charge. Policy instruments ought to accommodate regional heterogeneity and transfer mechanisms will be necessary to ensure efficient, politically stable cooperation.
Which regional exposure conclusions are identified when public data do not observe buyer-seller links across states? We study this question by treating the missing intermediate-input spatial kernel as an unknown coupling constrained by regional activity margins, support restrictions, and auxiliary shipment moments. For linear exposure statistics, the sharp identified set is computed by transportation linear programs. Applying the method to U.S. state-sector data, we find that shipment data are inconsistent with the spatial diffuseness implied by proportional regionalization in key goods sectors. However, they do not identify a unique regional production network or a precise ranking of state exposure to local shocks. Bilateral shipment restrictions tighten the bounds, but much of the remaining uncertainty comes from large service and mixed sectors that are weakly covered by goods-movement data. The results show which exposure conclusions are supported by public data and which are imposed by maintained regionalization assumptions.
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents that make consumption decisions on behalf of users. This shift raises fundamental questions for consumer theory, which has traditionally modeled humans as the primary decision-makers. In this paper, we introduce LLM Consumer Behavior Theory, a new field of study concerned with analyzing consumer behavior in agentic markets. Drawing on classical and behavioral economics alongside recent advances in Natural Language Processing, we formalize how human preferences are reflected and acted upon by LLM-based agents, and how agent-level decisions aggregate into market demand. We unify previously fragmented literature on LLM decision-making, human behavior simulation, and preference elicitation under a common economic lens, highlighting where assumptions, such as rationality and heterogeneity, may fail in agentic markets. Rather than providing empirical validation, this paper outlines the scope of LLM consumer behavior and identifies open research questions related to alignment, preference representation, and market dynamics.
According to the recent Wealth Thermalization Hypothesis (WTH) the wealth inequality in the world is described by the Rayleigh-Jeans (RJ) thermal distribution of interacting agents in a society with social stratification. In this concept, the wealth layers of society are associated with energy levels from a nonlinear dynamical system conserving two integrals of motion being total energy and probability norm. This leads to RJ condensation and the formation of a huge poverty phase of low wealth and a tiny oligarchic phase that captures a main part of total society wealth. This RJ phenomenon has similarities with self cleaning in multimode optical fibers and constraint driven condensation in various physical systems. We analyze real Lorenz and Pareto curves for wealth of households in countries and the world, Gross Domestic Product of countries, market capitalization of companies at stock exchange of Hong Kong, Shanghai, London, bitcoin transactions, world trade between countries and show that the WTH theory gives a good description of these curves. On the basis of this comparison we argue that the RJ thermal distribution provides a universal description of wealth inequality in the world.
New York City implemented the nation's first cordon-based congestion pricing program in January 2025, providing an opportunity to evaluate how system-wide urban mobility responds to large-scale pricing interventions. Because such policies generate spillovers across modes and locations, credible control groups are difficult to construct. We address this challenge using time series foundation models to generate probabilistic counterfactual demand forecasts with calibrated uncertainty. Applying this framework to bus, subway, and aggregate trip volume data, we find that post-policy bus and subway ridership increased significantly relative to expected no-policy demand, while overall travel demand decreased modestly. The effects are spatially heterogeneous: while reductions in overall travel demand are concentrated within the Congestion Relief Zone, transit gains extend beyond Manhattan's core. Socio-demographic analyses further reveal uneven adaptation across neighborhoods, highlighting spatial equity implications. Our framework provides a scalable approach for the uncertainty-aware evaluation of system-wide urban interventions when clean control groups are unavailable.
A central operator schedules each vehicle's passage time through a bottleneck to achieve a dynamic system optimum (DSO). The assignment depends on each vehicle's preferred arrival time, which is private and must be elicited from each vehicle. Mechanisms that elicit exact preferences, such as the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanism, can achieve strategyproofness but involve relatively complex rules and a computational burden on the operator. We focus instead on coarse reporting, in which each vehicle selects from a finite menu of time slots of a common width. This discrete interface already structures reservation and appointment systems in practice, including managed lanes for automated vehicles, airport slot allocation, and delivery appointment windows. We design a slot-based DSO mechanism on this coarse interface, in which the operator implements DSO assignment based on the reported slots and charges a capacity shadow price as a toll, and evaluate its performance. We prove that both the worst-case misreporting gain and the expected efficiency loss decrease quadratically in the slot width. The efficiency loss decays in this way under binding capacity, while the worst-case misreporting gain requires an additional condition on the preferred arrival time distribution and the schedule cost function. Analyzing the no-toll case, we find that the misreporting incentive persists, however finely the slots are refined, indicating that the toll also serves to elicit truthful reports. Numerical experiments support these theoretical results and show that they continue to hold in parameter regions outside the sufficient conditions.
We study sparse semi-continuous tensor data with excess zeros, heavy right tails, and slice-specific dispersion. Such features arise naturally in monetary-valued multi-way data, such as international trade, where most exporter--importer--product--year cells are zero while positive values are continuous and highly variable. To model these data, we propose a Bayesian hierarchical tensor factorization model that places a low-rank CP structure on a latent Poisson rate tensor and couples it with a conditional Gamma model for positive outcomes, with rate parameters that can vary across slices within a mode. The model therefore separates the occurrence and magnitude of positive observations while borrowing strength across all tensor dimensions through a shared low-rank latent structure. To scale posterior inference to large arrays, we develop a hybrid variational--Monte Carlo algorithm that combines efficient coordinate ascent updates with a partially collapsed augmented-data sampler. Applied to approximately 60 million trade flows, the method surfaces multiway dependence across exporters, importers, products, and years that is difficult to recover from gravity-type or pairwise network analyses, which do not jointly model the product and temporal dimensions.
Organizations and researchers show increasing interest in using large language models (LLMs) in place of human participants in A/B tests, in the hope of experimenting faster and at lower cost. We study when a treatment effect estimated on LLM outcomes recovers the effect that would have been measured on the human population of interest. Distributional equivalence between LLM and human outcomes would make any standard estimator valid but is unrealistic. We therefore develop a statistical framework that adapts surrogate endpoint theory to LLMs. The framework shows that calibrating LLM outcomes to human outcomes identifies the average treatment effect under surrogacy and comparability conditions that are jointly weaker than distributional equivalence. When these conditions fail, the effect of interest is only partially identified, and we provide diagnostics that can falsify surrogacy on historical experiments together with a bound on the worst-case bias from limited overlap. We further show that the stochasticity inherent to LLMs introduces both bias and variance, but using an average of multiple draws as the surrogate mitigates both. We illustrate the methods and theory in simulations and an application to A/B tests on Upworthy headlines. A central takeaway from our work is that the validity of LLM outcomes as surrogates can only be falsified for past treatments and never verified for new ones, so human experiments remain indispensable for novel interventions. We discuss the role of LLM choice, prompting, and temperature as design variables, and how to size human experiments for validation.