2026-11-06 | | Total: 16
How does cross-border ownership shape the lithium supply chain? Using global data on mines and refineries, I estimate a model in which ownership can lower refiners' effective ore costs, encourage mines to restrict spot sales, and soften competition. To study these effects, I examine policies motivated by national security concerns about reliable access to critical mineral inputs: divestiture of Chinese stakes in overseas producers and a ban on ore exports to China. Divestiture increases spot ore supply but leaves lithium output nearly unchanged, while continued trade preserves Chinese access to ore. The export ban reduces global lithium supply because refining capacity elsewhere cannot fully replace lost Chinese production. Ownership transfers do not reserve ore for domestic production; restricting Chinese access imposes a substantial supply cost at existing capacities.
Policymakers who set prices for public infrastructure often anticipate an equity-efficiency trade-off: while higher prices could increase revenues from fee-paying users, helping to offset costs, they may reduce take-up among the poor. But this trade-off is fundamentally altered in the presence of economies of scale, which are common in infrastructure networks. We elicit willingness to pay for a household-level piped drinking water connection in rural Bangladesh, where truthful revelation of preferences is incentivized by the opportunity to connect to a new pipeline network that we construct, and we use project cost data to measure economies of scale. Combining the two, we show that the cost-effectiveness-maximizing price---that which minimizes the cost per connected household---is zero. Economies of scale strongly dominate revenues raised by user fees. More generally, the two conditions needed for a zero price to maximize cost-effectiveness are important economies of scale and high sensitivity of demand to prices near zero, which is well documented across developing countries. Since a zero price naturally maximizes equity, we conclude that economies of scale can eliminate the equity-efficiency trade-off.
In many choice settings, a rise in aggregate demand for an option lowers an individual's payoff from choosing it. Driving becomes less attractive than taking a train when more commuters drive, clogging the highway. In such cases, a targeted intervention that mitigates the externality at the congested option can divert it elsewhere and also undermine preference based sorting, making overall welfare effects theoretically ambiguous. We develop an empirical framework to analyze such scenarios of endogenous congestion. We show that in these settings, equilibrium exists and is unique without restrictions on functional-form of utilities or dimension/distribution of preference heterogeneity, and even when congestion at one option affects payoffs from other choices. Under a linear-index structure, micro-data on choice enables semiparametric identification of utility contrasts and welfare effects of some, but not all, interventions. We apply the framework to Cambridge undergraduate admissions, where candidates apply through one constituent college, and admission probability depends on application numbers relative to capacity in that college. Using administrative micro-data on 25,325 applicants, we calculate welfare under two counterfactuals: (i) centralized random allocation and (ii) higher rent at popular colleges. Random allocation reduces welfare for everyone: it removes individual choice without improving admission chances since, by design, lower congestion at a college exactly counterbalances the lower probability of being allocated there. Targeted rent increase produces both gains and losses, with median loss for men and median gain for women. This exercise shows how identified preferences and equilibrium feedback jointly determine welfare when choices entail externalities.
Can welfare effects of price change be identified when consumers' consideration sets are heterogeneous and unobserved? We establish that the welfare distribution is the same functional of structural choice probabilities under stable but limited consideration as under full consideration. The result permits unrestricted income-effects, preference heterogeneity, and dependence between preferences and consideration. Within this class, limited consideration admits a full-consideration representation preserving choice-probabilities and money-metric compensation: consideration/preferences can remain unidentified while demand and welfare are identified. When consideration sets contract as prices rise, the welfare distribution can be bounded using demand and a bound on choice-set attrition.
A principal chooses an action using advice from an expert who privately knows local conditions. Before receiving advice, she can commission a public study of an independent state, such as future demand, that changes the expected conflict between their preferred actions. We show that the communication protocol determines the optimal study. Under optimal mediation, the value of advice is convex in conflict, making full revelation optimal. Under commitment to an action rule, the principal may prefer no information, while informative optimal studies include a report certifying high conflict. Under unmediated cheap talk, changes in the number of equilibrium messages create upward kinks in the value of advice. Optimal studies avoid interior communication thresholds and can induce two distant communication regimes while skipping every regime in between, strictly outperforming both full revelation and no information. When the principal retains the raw data, selective public disclosure can improve advice without sacrificing forecasting precision. We discuss implications for fiscal forecasts and spending agencies.
A growing number of choice modelling studies estimate their models "in willingness-to-pay (WTP) space", yet often treat this as a different model that fits better (or worse) than "preference space", and misread what its parameters represent. This note brings together and makes precise insights that have mostly been stated only in scattered places, organising them around a single condition for two specifications to be the same model. WTP space is a reparameterisation, and with non-random coefficients the two spaces give identical likelihoods, WTP estimates and standard errors. With deterministic heterogeneity in cost sensitivity, or non-linearity, WTP must still be computed as a ratio of partial derivatives, although a simple normalisation recovers a directly estimated WTP at a reference point. With random heterogeneity, latent class models are equivalent in the two spaces, while other mixtures are equivalent only when the implied distributions match, as with full-covariance lognormals, and independence is not a neutral assumption.
We study robust prize design in all-pay contests with loss-averse agents when the principal does not know the agents' convex cost of effort, subject to an aggregate productivity constraint. The robustly optimal prize structure awards equal prizes to all contestants except the one ranked last. The optimal bottom prize is zero under moderate loss aversion, but becomes positive and increases with loss aversion when loss aversion is sufficiently strong. Under strong loss aversion, the robust solution involves partial participation in the contest.
We study the procurement of verifiable evidence from an expert who privately assesses a binary state and chooses the direction and intensity of evidence acquisition. The buyer balances the ease of inducing discovery against its value for decisions beyond the expert's initial assessment. An optimal contract pays only for disclosed evidence, independently of the initial report. When acquisition is cheap, equal rewards for evidence of either state induce intensive search whose failure is informative. As costs rise, rewarding evidence of only one state becomes optimal despite the symmetry of the environment, reducing expected payments at the expense of decision accuracy.
This paper examines robustness and causal interpretation of panel estimates using double/debiased machine learning. The prototype treatment setup is the 2018 US banking regulation. Under common treatment timing, we characterize identification and nuisance restrictions and derive exact bank-level representations of specified "within" and "first-difference" scores. Simulations assess panel model transformation-induced specification bias and inference under weaker overlap. Empirically, estimates vary with asset-size classification and prior growth. Prior-growth adjustment reduces overlap-weighted estimates across four Machine Learners (ML); doubly robust estimates depend on the fitted propensity and concentrated weights. Both bank groups received relief, so we estimate differential exposure effects. The findings highlight specification issues and the relation between functional-form robustness and causal identification.
Estimation and inference on a single large network are challenging due to dependence among observations. This paper studies nonparametric regression for outcomes defined on groups of $p$ agents, such as the indicator that three agents in a network form a triangle. Outcomes on groups that share an agent may be dependent, while outcomes on disjoint groups are independent. I call this problem subgraph regression; it nests dyadic regression as the special case $p=2$. Its leading application concerns subgraphs of a network, but the methods apply to any outcome defined on groups of agents. I establish a variance bound, uniform convergence rates in probability, and pointwise asymptotic normality for the subgraph analogue of the Nadaraya-Watson kernel regression estimator. The setting differs from regression with i.i.d. data in two ways: (i) the number of observations, of order $N^p$, overstates the effective sample size, which is $N$, and (ii) the rate of convergence depends on the dimension of the covariates of a single agent rather than of all $p$ agents, which mitigates the curse of dimensionality.
Advances in technology decrease the costs of offering and choosing from large menus of varieties. As these complexity costs fall, how large are the menus offered by monopolists likely to become? For the multi-product or multi-attribute case, ubiquitous in practice, we show that optimal menus are generically infinite in the absence of complexity costs. Complexity costs can decrease the menu size, but it grows without bound as these costs decrease. These results have no analogue in the single-dimensional model and do not rely on non-linearities in production costs or preferences; the extensive product differentiation is caused by screening considerations alone.
Attention-based time series forecasters commonly group consecutive observations into patches. Patch length is known to have a substantial impact on forecasting performance, yet its selection remains largely empirical. We develop a theoretical framework that explains why patch length matters for forecasting accuracy and provides a principled basis for its selection. For linear state-space models, we derive an exact factorization of the forecasting coefficient matrix that separates forecast dynamics from filtering dynamics. We show that dominance of a single forecast component at long horizons does not generally imply a rank-one representation. This explains why longer horizons alone need not reduce representational complexity. We combine the factorization with estimation bounds to develop a patch-selection criterion that balances representation and estimation errors under temporal dependence. Our analysis establishes conditions under which balanced patching is justified and clarifies how predictive structure, head count, training sample size, and long-run dependence enter the selection criterion.
Electric robotaxis are rapidly expanding from pilots to scaled commercial deployment; unlike traditional human-driven ride-hailing vehicles, they require centralized fleet control and careful management of vehicle state of charge (SoC). We study how a fleet manager should jointly make service, empty repositioning, idling, and charging decisions in such systems. We develop a continuous-time fluid model in which vehicles evolve across location-charge states, and identify two forms of charge-aware control that are absent from classic repositioning models: early return-to-depot (RTD) and charge-aware repositioning. In particular, the optimal solution admits simple threshold structures. Each location has a battery threshold such that vehicles should return to the depot to recharge when their SoC is below it and should not do so when their SoC is above it. Vehicles should not reposition below the same threshold either; above it, the choice of destination depends on whether a vehicle's SoC matches the destination's battery sensitivity, a notion we introduce in the paper. We then quantify the value of charge awareness by comparing fully charge-aware policies with charge-oblivious policies that ignore SoC in RTD and repositioning decisions. We show that the performance gap can be unbounded, driven by a dilemma between under-utilizing high-charge vehicles and over-sending low-charge vehicles to locations from which charging is costly. A numerical case study calibrated using 2025 NYC Taxi and Limousine Commission trip records illustrates these thresholds and shows that charge-aware control can generate substantial gains in a realistic urban network. Importantly, simple threshold-based heuristics recover most of the value of the fully charge-aware solution.
Convex cooperative games have a nonempty core and admit an efficient construction of core allocations. However, economically natural local frictions may violate convexity. We study the core of $3$-distant convex games, which permit violations of convexity only between closely related coalitions. Although the core of such a game may be empty, we establish a simple necessary and sufficient condition for its nonemptiness. We also develop a strongly polynomial-time combinatorial algorithm for finding a core allocation whenever one exists. Finally, we demonstrate the applicability of the framework to oligopolistic competition with merger synergies and profit allocation of joint production with complementary inputs.
In contract design, the principal is often better informed about the project's chances of succeeding than the agents. To incentivize effort, the principal has two main tools: first, to design a contract, sharing part of the project's success among the agents; second, to design a (Bayesian) persuasion scheme, selectively sharing information with the agents. In this work we are interested in the optimal combination of both these tools. We tackle the joint problem through the prism of simplicity vs. optimality, and establish a stark dichotomy: The simple disclosure scheme of full transparency achieves a tight $4/3$-approximation to the optimal combination of information disclosure and team contract, when the team's production function is submodular. In contrast, full transparency can be arbitrarily far from optimal when production is supermodular. The techniques that we develop to bound the gap for submodular functions, also yield a new deterministic polynomial-time approximation algorithm for pure multi-agent contract design, with a significantly improved approximation ratio of $2.311$, and thus a $3.081$-approximation algorithm for the joint information and contracting problem.
We give a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm for computing an exact extensive-form proper equilibrium in a finite two-player zero-sum extensive-form game with perfect recall and rational data. Properness is understood in the agent normal form: an action at an information set is penalized relative to a better action while all other local behavioral choices, including the player's own future actions, remain fixed. Our algorithm assigns each information set a geometric permutahedron of allowable action probabilities. A scaled doubly stochastic representation embeds these restrictions in a polynomial-size sequence-form polytope; a saddle point then satisfies the local $\varepsilon$-properness inequalities. To obtain an exact equilibrium rather than a solution at an arbitrarily small numerical perturbation, we establish sign stability of a parametric linear system, construct a persistent feasible basis, and extract the limits of behavioral ratios. The resulting probabilities are rational and have polynomial encoding length, including at information sets whose realization probabilities vanish.