2025-05-16 | | Total: 6
For many economic questions, the empirical results are not interesting unless they are strong. For these questions, theorizing before the results are known is not always optimal. Instead, the optimal sequencing of theory and empirics trades off a ``Darwinian Learning'' effect from theorizing first with a ``Statistical Learning'' effect from examining the data first. This short paper formalizes the tradeoff in a Bayesian model. In the modern era of mature economic theory and enormous datasets, I argue that post hoc theorizing is typically optimal.
In his book entitled ''A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive'' (1843), John Stuart Mill proposed principles of inductive reasoning in the form of five canons. To date, these canons are classic methods for causal reasoning: they are intended to single out the circumstances that are connected to the phenomenon under focus. The present paper reinterprets Mill's canons in the modern theory of social ranking solutions, which aims to estimate the power of individuals based on teams' performances. We first apply Mill's canons to determine the key success factors in cooperative performances and then characterize plurality using a strong version of Mill's first canon. Plurality is also compatible with most other canons. Thus, our results demonstrated a hidden link between classical causal reasoning and the theory of social ranking solutions.
Production networks, dynamic systems of firms linked through input-output relationships, transmit microeconomic shocks into macroeconomic fluctuations. While prior studies often assume static networks, real-world economies feature continuous firm entry (node addition) and exit (node deletion). We develop a probabilistic model to analyze how these dynamics affect production volatility and network resilience. Integrating Leontief input-output frameworks with controllability theory. By quantifying fluctuations as expected values under probabilistic node dynamics, we identify trade-offs between adaptability and stability. Methodologically, we unify Kalman rank criteria and minimum input theory, offering policymakers insights to balance innovation-driven entry with safeguards against destabilizing exits.
Dynamic input-output models are standard tools for understanding inter-industry dependencies and how economies respond to shocks like disasters and pandemics. However, traditional approaches often assume fixed prices, limiting their ability to capture realistic economic behavior. Here, we introduce an adaptive extension to dynamic input-output recovery models where producers respond to shocks through simultaneous price and quantity adjustments. Our framework preserves the economic constraints of the Leontief input-output model while converging towards equilibrium configurations based on sector-specific behavioral parameters. When applied to input-output data, the model allows us to compute behavioral metrics indicating whether specific sectors predominantly favor price or quantity adjustments. Using the World Input-Output Database, we identify strong, consistent regional and sector-specific behavioral patterns. These findings provide insights into how different regions employ distinct strategies to manage shocks, thereby influencing economic resilience and recovery dynamics.
Triple Differences (DDD) designs are widely used in empirical work to relax parallel trends assumptions in Difference-in-Differences (DiD) settings. This paper shows that common DDD implementations -- such as taking the difference between two DiDs or applying three-way fixed effects regressions -- are generally invalid when identification requires conditioning on covariates. In staggered adoption settings, the common DiD practice of pooling all not-yet-treated units as a comparison group introduces additional bias, even when covariates are not required for identification. These insights challenge conventional empirical strategies and underscore the need for estimators tailored specifically to DDD structures. We develop regression adjustment, inverse probability weighting, and doubly robust estimators that remain valid under covariate-adjusted DDD parallel trends. For staggered designs, we show how to correctly leverage multiple comparison groups to get more informative inference. Simulations highlight substantial bias reductions and precision gains relative to standard approaches, offering a new framework for credible DDD estimation in empirical research.
This paper investigates the relationship between job mobility and earnings growth in the UK labour market, with a focus on gender differences in the returns to switching jobs. Using data from the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (ASHE) between 2011 and 2023, the analysis compares wage progression for job switchers and stayers, controlling for individual and job characteristics. The findings show that job mobility is associated with higher earnings growth, but women experience smaller gains than men, with occupational mobility and age further widening this gap. However, the study finds no statistically significant evidence that changes in occupation, sector, or working time pattern influence this gender gap. The results highlight the importance of addressing gender disparities in the returns to job mobility and provide valuable evidence for developing policy interventions aimed at promoting more equitable labour market outcomes.