2026-07-08 | | Total: 23
U.S. life expectancy stagnated and declined in the 2010s despite continued growth in real per capita income. We use Preston curves to characterize this pattern as a change in the relationship between income and longevity. Using state-level data from 1980 to 2019 and county-level data from 2000 to 2019, we estimate population-weighted Preston curves relating life expectancy to logged real per capita income. From 1980 to 2010, U.S. states followed the classic Preston curve pattern: rising income was accompanied by rising life expectancy. Counties followed the same pattern from 2000 to 2010. From 2010 to 2019, however, states and continued to become richer while life expectancy stagnated or declined. The curves shifted right without shifting up and became steeper, indicating decoupling and divergence: increases in aggregate resources over time no longer produced broad longevity gains, and, in any given year, inequality in life expectancy by income grew. These patterns are robust to alternative temporal anchors around the Great Recession and to substituting education for income. They also appear across sex and racial groups. County-level decompositions are broadly consistent with arguments that longevity has fallen due to widely shared exposure to social deterioration, which may account for the Preston curve reversal. Collectively, we show that the recent U.S. mortality crisis reveals a weakening -- and growing inequality -- in the conversion of aggregate resources into longevity gains. We conclude that the recent U.S. mortality crisis should be understood not only as a story about particular causes of death, but also as a weakening of institutional and social translation.
This study proposes a formal, computationally efficient nonparametric omnibus test for treatment-effect heterogeneity that is compatible with a broad class of estimators, including modern machine-learning methods. The test is designed for settings in which identification can rely on high-dimensional controls while heterogeneity is assessed with respect to a low-dimensional subset of covariates. We derive the test statistic's asymptotic null distribution and develop a bootstrap procedure that is efficient because it avoids re-estimating nuisance parameters in each iteration. The testing approach applies to multiple empirical designs, including randomized experiments, selection-on-observables, difference-in-differences, and instrumental-variables settings. Monte Carlo simulations show that the test attains near-nominal size under the null and exhibits good power against heterogeneous alternatives. We further illustrate the procedure using two empirical applications on retirement savings and trade liberalization.
This paper develops the asymptotic theory for high-dimensional panel data regressions in settings with cross-sectionally dependent errors driven by common shocks. We consider a factor-augmented sparse-group LASSO estimator that combines MIDAS aggregation with latent factors. The estimator can take advantage of the mixed-frequency group structure in the time-series dimension. Theory shows that it can outperform the standard LASSO estimator both for prediction and estimation while allowing for cross-sectional dependence.
We characterize correlated equilibrium in finite normal-form games. Interpreting correlated strategies as action recommendations, we show that correlated equilibrium is the unique solution concept that never recommends a pure-strategy dominated action, treats payoff-equivalent actions interchangeably, and respects the sure-thing principle under uncertainty about payoffs and the correlation device. A parallel characterization identifies coarse correlated equilibrium among solution concepts that recommend dominant actions whenever they exist and treat payoff-equivalent actions as strongly interchangeable.
Real social and economic networks involve individuals with diverse incentives, yet most studies of network games assume homogeneous preferences or few player types. We introduce a general framework for binary choice network games with fully heterogeneous payoff structures. We first show that any such game can be transformed into an equivalent one with conformist, rebel, and stubborn archetypes, preserving equilibria and best response trajectories. We then establish sufficient conditions for pure strategy Nash equilibrium existence and convergence of best response dynamics on arbitrary networks, while proving that equilibria almost surely vanish in large sparse random networks. We further develop a deterministic approximation approach that predicts evolutionary trends and equilibrium strategy frequencies from network homophily and heterophily patterns, without computing equilibria explicitly. Extending the framework to limited information, we prove that dynamics converge either to a unique limited information equilibrium or to a unique stationary distribution, and we derive necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of the limited information equilibrium. We validate our predictions using Prisoner's Dilemma games on real social networks that incorporate heterogeneous altruism and peer influence. These findings together provide a unified framework for equilibrium existence, evolutionary dynamics, and equilibrium outcome prediction in heterogeneous network games.
Macroeconomic forecasts refer to outcomes that are first released and then revised. A 90 percent interval for the first GDP release, a six-month value, or a latest-value benchmark is not the same uncertainty statement. We ask how revision risk evolves through the release cycle and what can be reported in real time when later-outcome errors are scarce. We decompose later-outcome MSE into preliminary forecast risk, revision risk, and their covariance. In SPF data, first-release to roughly 180-day revisions account for 8.3 percent of later-outcome MSE across real-activity targets, versus 3.6 percent across inflation targets. We show that later-outcome uncertainty is partially identified: released histories give early-error and revision marginals, but not their dependence. This yields a sharp Frechet-Makarov set and motivates direct late calibration, dependence-robust transport, and signed or revision-model transport. Out-of-sample results support method choice rather than a universal transport rule: coverage and stability determine when transport gains are usable.
This paper evaluates stabilization scenarios for Bolivia under external-financing stress by jointly modeling financial sustainability, verifiable social sustainability and the net additionality of multilateral financing. The main correction is that financing already received, contracted or expected from multilateral institutions cannot be counted as a marginal benefit of a hypothetical IMF Extended Fund Facility. Already secured resources are moved to the baseline; only incremental, liquid, timely and non-displaced financing is rewarded. The analysis combines corrected scenario scoring, poverty and inequality measures, maternal-child mortality indicators, public investment multipliers, self-defeating consolidation diagnostics, Monte Carlo uncertainty, leave-one-criterion-out tests and adverse execution assumptions. The results do not support an orthodox IMF-first strategy or front-loaded fiscal consolidation. The strongest designs are concessional multilateral packages with verified net additionality, productive execution, social-health floors and protection against poverty and maternal-child deterioration. An IMF arrangement is valuable only if it adds resources or credibility that were not already secured. The conclusion is that sustainability must be evaluated as a joint financial and social condition: closing cash gaps by weakening growth, poverty, inequality or maternal-child outcomes can be macroeconomically self-defeating.
Integrated urban models (IUM) typically rely on a measure of accessibility or travel time to form the link between the transportation and land use systems. Such integration does not fully capture the trade-offs made by households in how they spend their limited temporal and monetary budgets. We propose a microeconomic foundation for transportation and land use choice model integration based on the theory of home production. A utility function is developed that considers both household monetary expenditure and individual time use. We address several limitations in previous home production functions. First, the introduction of a parallel constrained multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) structure that allows for the inclusion of multi-person households in the model. Second, travel time is defined as the minimum time required to conduct an activity and deducted from the temporal budget. This assumption has several appealing features. It defines the minimum time to complete an activity as a measure of accessibility. An empirical application is provided for the Greater Toronto Area using a validated synthetic dataset. Empirical results demonstrate an economy of scale in time devoted to home production, analogous to scaling exhibit in market production. It was found that the mix of dwelling types (detached, apartment, etc.) has a significant influence on both time use and consumption. Finally, we provide several directions for future research to advance the practice of urban modelling and better capture the complex dynamics of household decision-making.
Widely held views can go unspoken when speaking out alone invites retaliation. I recast such silence as a problem of safe coalition formation. When safety comes in numbers, there is a largest group that could speak safely. Open organizing must stay safe every step the way, making for a cascade of speaking up that stops short of that largest group. Social assurance contracts need safety only at the destination, and get there by keeping commitments private until enough people have joined: a tunnel to the largest safe group. If no member may ever regret joining, such failure privacy is necessary, not merely sufficient.
This paper proposes to project and expand the conditional mean function of the structural error given the regressors in an endogenous regression under consideration. As the projection process is semiparametric, we define this procedure as a semiparametric projection (SP) method to address endogeneity in regression models by internally constructed instrumental variables. The SP method is applicable to many classes of regression models associated with endogeneity, such as linear, nonlinear, and non- and semi-parametric models, and provides a simple and computationally tractable alternative to conventional instrumental variable approaches available from the existing literature. This paper establishes identification conditions and derives the asymptotic properties of the resulting estimators. It then proposes a simple LASSO selection method to examine the finite-sample performance of both the proposed method and the established theory by simulated and real data examples.
Standard stochastic choice models used to estimate risk aversion can lead to risk-aversion reversals, where a more risk-averse individual chooses a riskier lottery more frequently than a less risk-averse individual. We study when reversals are implied by the preference specification rather than the noise specification. We say that two utilities imply reversals in a given noise framework if reversals arise for every specification of noise for each individual. For weak utility, a flexible class that includes logit and probit and allows for menu-dependent noise, two utilities imply reversals if and only if their curvature ratio is unbounded. This condition holds for CARA, CRRA, and their generalizations, for which reversals arise for empirically relevant coefficients and lotteries, raising concerns about resulting estimates and out-of-sample predictions. Finally, we show that equicautious HARA, sum-ex, and sum-power utilities do not imply reversals and that, moreover, these families remain well-behaved for multinomial choice.
A representative democracy is immune to gerrymandering if it satisfies Chambers' (2008) representative consistency. We examine preference aggregation and show that representative consistency is mutually inconsistent with three other normative desiderata -- efficiency, anonymity, and neutrality. We show this impossibility result both in a setting with ordinal preferences and a setting with expected utility preferences.
On a large French ridesharing platform, new minority drivers earn 11.6% less revenue than otherwise similar nonminority drivers; the gap nearly vanishes as they accumulate reviews. Reviews drive the convergence: when a railway strike exogenously raised demand and sped up review accumulation, minority entrants gained the most. We explain the pattern with an estimated model of passenger choice and driver career concerns. Passengers hold overly pessimistic priors about minority entrants - expecting substantially lower quality before the ride than they report after it. As a result, minority drivers cut introductory prices and exert extra effort to overturn those beliefs quickly. Counterfactuals show the cost of incorrect priors is high, and the reputation system strictly benefits minority drivers.
We study joint decision-making when agents agree on all primitives other than signal likelihoods. We propose a decision-theoretic measure of interpretive disagreement: a pair of subjective models is more agreeable than another if, uniformly across decision problems, it supports a larger set of signal-contingent plans that both agents weakly prefer ex-ante to the common reservation payoff. We show that this measure is prior independent and can be represented as an inclusion preorder over pairs of subjective models: each model in the more agreeable pair is a convex combination of the two models in the less agreeable pair. We then show that the measure's unique rotation-invariant scalar completion is cosine similarity. Applications show that greater agreement reduces speculative-trade wedges, expands a normalized version of the ex-ante Pareto frontier, and enlarges the set of single-model rationalizations. Our order is independent of Blackwell dominance and selects quadratic over KL-type Bregman divergences.
Global games theory provides a tractable framework for analyzing coordination problems with multiple equilibria, with regime overthrow serving as a canonical application. A large empirical literature on coups d'état examines the relationship between country-level characteristics, coup occurrence, and coup success using reduced-form approaches that leave the underlying coordination problem implicit. Bridging these literatures, we develop an estimable global games model of coups d'état. The model incorporates strategic coordination into the empirical analysis of coups, employing the global games framework as an equilibrium selection device. The model distinguishes between the feasibility and desirability of regime overthrow, allowing observable fundamentals to enter separately into beliefs about regime strength and perceived gains from rebellion. The model therefore provides a theoretical basis for decomposing coup outcomes into feasibility and desirability components under maintained exclusion restrictions and equilibrium assumptions. If information on coup strength is available, the model also allows estimation of agents' uncertainty about regime strength. We show how the model can be estimated using simulated maximum likelihood coupled with a contraction mapping, and demonstrate how observable covariates map into regime strength and the perceived benefits of overthrow. We illustrate how the framework can be applied through counterfactuals varying coup benefits, regime strength, and information quality.
We prove that every mean-zero probability law on the real line is the law of X-Y for some identically distributed real-valued random variables X and Y.
Recommending the correct set of energy conservation measures (ECMs) for a building is a structured, multi-label prediction problem in which a task-specific supervised model has weak training signal and a general language model has no grounding in the local building stock. We study this problem on 10,422 real New York City Local Law 87 (LL87) energy-audit records, taking as ground truth the set of ECM categories that certified auditors actually recommended. We make four contributions. First, we establish that energy-use-intensity (EUI) prediction - the upstream task - is effectively solved by tree ensembles: across fifteen trained models, a stacking ensemble reaches a coefficient of determination R^2 = 0.757, and every one of six neural architectures is outperformed by gradient-boosted trees. Second, we show that the framing of the recommendation task dominates model choice: recasting ECM recommendation as 19-way multi-label classification rather than single-label categorization lifts a gradient-boosted-tree baseline from a previously reported 25.9% accuracy to a micro-F1 of 0.571. Third, we benchmark eight large language models (LLMs) from four providers in a 2x2 design that independently toggles retrieval grounding and explicit reasoning, scoring each arm on per-label F1, U.S.-dollar cost per building, and latency; retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) improves micro-F1 by +0.11 to +0.20 on every model, while explicit reasoning yields no measurable accuracy change (-0.018 to +0.010) at up to 8.4x the cost. Fourth, we show LLMs systematically over-recommend - high recall, low precision - and that retrieval closes the gap chiefly by improving precision. A 70-billion-parameter open-weight model with a fifteen-line nearest-neighbor retrieval step reaches 0.511 micro-F1 at $0.00032 per building, comparable to a frontier model at roughly 10.1x lower cost.
We propose a mathematical framework for redistricting compactness grounded in the classical soap bubble problem: the partition of a planar region into N subregions of prescribed population that minimizes total shared boundary length. This formulation, which we call the soap bubble model, yields a physically and mathematically natural optimality criterion that generalizes all existing per-district compactness measures. We carefully distinguish two formulations: minimizing physical boundary length in geographic coordinates, and minimizing a density-weighted length in the coordinates produced by the Monge--Ampere density-flattening map. In the transformed coordinates, the first-order conditions for a minimizer are precisely the classical two-dimensional Plateau's laws -- circular arc boundaries, 120-degree triple junctions, and perpendicular boundary contact. In geographic coordinates, the Euler--Lagrange equation shows arc curvature varies proportionally with local population density, so boundaries curve more tightly through dense areas and gently through sparse ones. Remarkably, the 120-degree junction condition and 90-degree boundary condition are unchanged by the density, as they follow from a force-balance argument that does not involve density. We adopt the physical-length objective as the natural redistricting criterion -- it minimizes actual miles of district boundary and requires no coordinate transformation -- and derive the corresponding density-modified volume-preserving mean curvature flow as its gradient descent. The N-state Potts model on the census block adjacency graph with population-weighted pressure updates is the natural discrete implementation of this flow. We define a multiplicative gerrymandering metric decomposed into tactical and systemic components and discuss practical computation, including grid-pinning effects in the discrete setting.
In non-convex markets, a competitive equilibrium may fail to exist. This turns out to be an important issue in real-world non-convex auction markets, such as electricity markets, as it complicates pricing and requires the auctioneer to resort to out-of-market discriminatory side payments to sustain an equilibrium. We investigate whether the introduction of convex financial trading induces a smoothing effect, mitigating the issues arising from non-convexities. We develop a two-stage non-convex market model (a forward market followed by a spot market) in which convex financial traders participate in the forward market. Our model predicts that financial trading reduces the magnitude of side payments required to support the cleared allocation. To test the prediction of our model, we examine the introduction of a transaction fee on financial traders in 2020 by PJM, the US's largest electricity market. We show that the substantial decline in financial trading volume caused by this policy coincided with a significant increase in side payments, in line with our theoretical predictions.
A proportional wealth tax acts as a uniform gravitational field on the wealth distribution: it shifts the drift of the Fokker-Planck equation without altering the diffusion, preserving the Gini coefficient at all finite times. The same drift-shift symmetry that makes the tax non-distortionary also makes it non-redistributive through the market channel. Redistribution requires breaking this symmetry. A progressive tax (confining potential) replaces the Pareto steady state with a thinner-tailed distribution whose Gini is a closed-form function of the progressivity parameter; source-sink terms (tax-funded transfers) reshape the density directly. We formulate optimal redistribution as a control problem for the Fokker-Planck equation, penalising intervention costs including migration, evasion, and portfolio distortion. In general equilibrium the tax design feeds back through aggregate capital and the production function, yielding a self-consistent McKean-Vlasov equation with diminishing returns to progressivity. The spectral gap of the Fokker-Planck operator determines convergence speed: progressive taxes redistribute within policy-relevant timescales, whereas proportional taxes rely on slow demographic turnover.
Blockchain applications may have preferences over the order in which transactions execute: an automated market maker may use an external feed to price its liquidity, and require that the oracle update incorporating this price execute before any swap; an exchange may want to execute cancellations of limit orders before incoming market orders; an application may run an on-chain auction by executing bids from highest to lowest, so that the first bid wins. However, the ordering of transactions is chosen by the underlying blockchain and may not be compatible with the requirements of a specific application. In this paper, I tackle this problem by introducing an algorithm called unanimity override. The intuition is that when all the applications agree on how to order two transactions, the underlying blockchain should respect this agreement; a default order - the order in which transactions appear in the block - settles the rest. The problem with this naive approach is that application unanimity may form cycles, which the algorithm must break. Cycle-breaking is also the rule's main vulnerability because an attacker can insert transactions to manufacture a cycle. Yet two guarantees hold against any attacker who sets the default order, deploys applications, and inserts transactions. All transactions that interact with a single application that expressed preferences are ordered according to that application's preferences, even when they also interact with other applications that did not express preferences. Also, gated transactions - those that cannot be outranked in the unanimity order by any transaction crafted by an attacker - always execute as the applications unanimously prefer, even when they touch many applications. The two guarantees identify the preferences the protocol can protect, and they tell applications and senders in advance which transactions will execute in the intended order.
Recommendation systems and chatbots present content to users, typically using stochastic algorithms that select the content based on user characteristics or context. Examples of content include chat responses, videos, or items available for purchase. Scientists and application developers are often interested in whether characteristics of content increase outcomes such as user engagement. Estimates of such causal effects may guide content providers to generate content that emphasize desirable features. However, in settings with a large content library or where content is generated uniquely for a given user, it can be difficult to use observational data to learn the causal effect of content features, because the content a user sees is tailored to that user, and because content varies in many dimensions. This paper proposes a new method for estimating the impact of content features using observational data, when the algorithm that determines user exposure incorporates some randomization, and when two additional data elements are logged for each user: $(i)$ the identity of at least one item that could have been exposed to the user, but was not (the unexposed item); $(ii)$ an estimate of the ratio of the probability that the unexposed item would have been shown to the probability that the exposed item was shown. We show that causal effects of features are identified in this setting, even in the presence of unobserved confounders that affect both user preferences and the identity of the considered pair of items (exposed and unexposed). Our estimator differs from prior approaches in terms of what data is used and how the estimator is constructed.
We extend the persistent homology analysis of~\paperone{} to the full Roman--Byzantine trade network (0--1453\,\textsc{ce}), using 2{,}599 nodes and 4{,}503 trimodal edges calibrated against the \textsc{orbis} Geospatial Network Model. Five results are reported. % (i)~The $H_t{=}0$ western sub-network result of~\paperone{} is a data-coverage artifact: with full western representation ($N_{\rm west}=987$, $β_1\approx52$ cycles per decade) a baseline East--West entropy gap of $+2.22$ units is present from 0\,\textsc{ce} and grows at $+3.3\times10^{-3}$\,yr$^{-1}$, predating the Theodosian partition by four centuries. % (ii)~A \emph{hub-selection artifact} in degree-heterogeneous networks can reverse the sign of the inferred Phase~III slope, requiring full-coverage or stratified sampling for reliable structural-break detection. % (iii)~Decomposing Byzantine resilience into geographic ($H_{\rm geo}$) and economic ($H_{\rm eco}$) components reveals a peak decoupling ratio $R_d = H_{\rm eco}/H_{\rm geo} = 47.7$ at 620\,\textsc{ce}, falling to 13.9 at 640\,\textsc{ce}, quantifying the McCormick--Ward-Perkins historiographical debate as a contrast between two network layers operating on different timescales. % (iv)~The inter-decade $W_2$ Wasserstein velocity identifies the Late Roman--Early Byzantine transition (495\,\textsc{ce}) as the highest topological-velocity event of the 1,453-year record; the cross-network Wasserstein ratio increases by $150$--$300\times$ after the Chrysobull of 1082\,\textsc{ce}, providing an independent diagram-space analogue of $R_d$. Both the Western collapse (476\,\textsc{ce}) and the Byzantine endpoint (1453\,\textsc{ce}) occur at $H^{\ast}\approx0.524$, interpreted as a candidate topological percolation threshold.