2026-07-07 | | Total: 3
At first glance, combining Newton's laws of motion with his law of gravitation seems straightforward. Students learn to distinguish inertial from gravitational mass and that their empirical equality is a remarkable fact about nature that will later serve as the conceptual gateway to general relativity. However, a closer look reveals a further and often neglected distinction within Newtonian gravity: that between active and passive gravitational mass. A common textbook argument maintains that these must be equal, for otherwise Newton's third law would be violated. We review and critically re-examine this familiar reasoning and show that the supposed theoretical proof is not compelling. Our analysis highlights subtle structural assumptions within Newtonian mechanics and offers physics teachers and researchers a fresh opportunity to explore foundational questions with potentially interesting applications in observational astronomy. In addition, an extended appendix, which is not part of the published AJP paper, offers some mathematical background material on the Galilean group and its action as group of dynamical symmetries for the type of dynamical equations considered here.
This work focuses on the two-dimensional, nine-velocity (D2Q9) lattice Boltzmann model. First, we show that the D2Q9 scheme cannot achieve secondorder accuracy unless the cubic velocity terms are neglected, and we explain how some of these parasitic terms can be eliminated. Second, we demonstrate that the standard choice of the equilibrium distribution has no effect on the equivalent PDE at second order. Finally, we numerically investigate the effect of these cubic terms and study different choices of equilibrium distributions using a new benchmark called the Oblique Dipole Benchmark, which describes obliquely propagating 2D vortex dipoles with periodic boundary conditions.
Battery discharging is governed by a fundamental trade-off between output power and energy conversion efficiency due to internal dissipation. In this paper, we demonstrate that such a trade-off universally yields a parabolic envelope $P\proptoη(1-η)$. The efficiency at maximum power is exactly one half, mirroring the well-known half-Carnot limit in finite-time thermodynamics. To extend this bound into practical operational rules, we formulate a multistage constant-current discharging (MSCD) schedule subject to simultaneous real-time load demands and a global discharging deadline. Analytical resolution via the Karush--Kuhn--Tucker conditions reveals a remarkably compact optimal policy: $I_{i}^{\star}=\max(I_{i}^{-},I_{0})$. Under this rule, stages limited by external demand run exactly at their minimum required currents, while all remaining stages are elevated to a uniform baseline $I_{0}$ fixed by the deadline constraint. By tracing the dissipation--time Pareto front, we quantify how internal resistance shifts the operational boundaries and sharpens the trade-off corner. This analysis establishes a rigorous thermodynamic baseline for the scheduling layer of battery management systems, offering natural extensions to nonlinear models incorporating temperature and state-of-charge dependencies.