2026-05-11 | | Total: 2
Our understanding of cell division control in bacteria still relies largely on interpreting correlations between phenomenological variables, with limited connection to the underlying molecular mechanisms. Here, we analytically solve a stochastic threshold-accumulation model in which a size-dependent divisor protein triggers division upon reaching a noisy, autocorrelated threshold, quantifying within a unified framework the combined effects of intrinsic and extrinsic noise and key mechanistic parameters such as protein reset and threshold memory. We show that incorporating these elements yields behavior far richer than the commonly assumed adder, spanning a continuum of division strategies from timer to sizer while modulating size fluctuations in a nontrivial fashion. Comparison with single-cell E. coli data shows that extrinsic noise and additional mechanistic ingredients are required to account for the observed size fluctuations. The adder emerges when threshold correlations balance protein reset, generalizing the hypothesis that full reset is necessary to maintain adder control. Our results establish a unified analytical framework linking stochastic molecular processes to emergent division laws, to be used in more complex bacterial cell-cycle models.
Interpreting transcriptomic data is one of the most common analytical tasks in modern biology. Yet most current models either consume expression profiles without producing natural-language biological explanations, or reason in language without direct access to quantitative omics measurements. We introduce OmicsLM, a multimodal LLM that connects quantitative omics profiles with natural-language biological tasks. OmicsLM represents each transcriptomic profile as a compact continuous representation within the LLM context. This interface preserves quantitative expression signal while allowing natural-language instructions, explicit gene mentions, and multiple interleaved biological samples to be processed together in one model context. We train OmicsLM on more than 5.5 million instruction-following examples spanning over 70 task types, combining continuous transcriptomic inputs, experimental data rendered through diverse language templates, and free-text biological knowledge and question-answering data. This mixture covers cell type annotation, perturbation prediction, clinical prediction, pathway reasoning, and open-ended biological question answering. Existing benchmarks evaluate either profile-level prediction or text-only biological QA, leaving language-guided, multi-sample reasoning over real expression profiles unmeasured. To close this gap, we introduce GEO-OmicsQA, a benchmark for multi-sample biological question answering built from real Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) studies. We demonstrate that OmicsLM can use expression profiles directly and perform comparably to specialized omics models on profile-level tasks, while outperforming both omics-specialized models and general LLMs on language-guided biological reasoning over expression data.