Authors:
S. J. Paul,
M. Arratia,
H. Hakobyan,
W. Brooks,
A. Acar,
P. Achenbach,
J. S. Alvarado,
W. R. Armstrong,
N. A. Baltzell,
L. Barion,
M. Bashkanov,
M. Battaglieri,
F. Benmokhtar,
A. Bianconi,
A. S. Biselli,
F. Bossù,
S. Boiarinov,
K. -T. Brinkmann,
W. J. Briscoe,
V. Burkert,
T. Cao,
D. S. Carman,
P. Chatagnon,
H. Chinchay,
G. Ciullo,
P. L. Cole,
A. D'Angelo,
N. Dashyan,
R. De Vita,
A. Deur,
S. Diehl,
C. Djalali,
R. Dupre,
H. Egiyan,
A. El Alaoui,
L. Elouadrhiri,
P. Eugenio,
M. Farooq,
S. Fegan,
A. Filippi,
C. Fogler,
G. Gavalian,
G. P. Gilfoyle,
R. W. Gothe,
B. Gualtieri,
M. Hattawy,
F. Hauenstein,
T. B. Hayward,
M. Hoballah,
M. Holtrop,
Yu-Chun Hung,
Y. Ilieva,
D. G. Ireland,
E. L. Isupov,
D. Jenkins,
H. S. Jo,
D. Keller,
M. Khandaker,
A. Kim,
V. Klimenko,
I. Korover,
A. Kripko,
V. Kubarovsky,
L. Lanza,
S. Lee,
P. Lenisa,
X. Li,
D. Marchand,
V. Mascagna,
B. McKinnon,
T. Mineeva,
V. Mokeev,
E. F. Molina Cardenas,
C. Munoz Camacho,
P. Nadel-Turonski,
T. Nagorna,
K. Neupane,
S. Niccolai,
G. Niculescu,
M. Osipenko,
A. I. Ostrovidov,
M. Ouillon,
P. Pandey,
M. Paolone,
L. L. Pappalardo,
R. Paremuzyan,
E. Pasyuk,
W. Phelps,
N. Pilleux,
P. S. H. Vaishnavi,
S. Polcher Rafael,
L. Polizzi,
J. W. Price,
Y. Prok,
A. Radic,
T. Reed,
J. Richards,
M. Ripani,
J. Ritman,
G. Rosner,
S. Schadmand,
A. Schmidt,
R. A. Schumacher,
Y. Sharabian,
S. Shrestha,
E. Sidoretti,
D. Sokhan,
N. Sparveris,
M. Spreafico,
S. Stepanyan,
I. I. Strakovsky,
S. Strauch,
M. Tenorio,
F. Touchte Codjo,
R. Tyson,
M. Ungaro,
S. Vallarino,
C. Velasquez,
L. Venturelli,
H. Voskanyan,
E. Voutier,
Y. Wang,
D. P. Watts,
U. Weerasinghe,
X. Wei,
M. H. Wood,
L. Xu,
Z. Xu,
M. Zurek
et al. (99 additional authors not shown)
We report on the first measurement of angular correlations between high-energy pions and slow protons in electron-nucleus ($eA$) scattering, providing a new probe of how a nucleus responds to a fast-moving quark. The experiment employed the CLAS detector with a 5-GeV electron beam incident on deuterium, carbon, iron, and lead targets. For heavier nuclei, the pion-proton correlation function is more spread-out in azimuth than for lighter ones, and this effect is more pronounced in the $πp$ channel than in earlier $ππ$ studies. The proton-to-pion yield ratio likewise rises with nuclear mass, although the increase appears to saturate for the heaviest targets. These trends are qualitatively reproduced by state-of-the-art $eA$ event generators, including BeAGLE, eHIJING, and GiBUU, indicating that current descriptions of target fragmentation rest on sound theoretical footing. At the same time, the precision of our data exposes model-dependent discrepancies, delineating a clear path for future improvements in the treatment of cold-nuclear matter effects in $eA$ scattering.
Subject:
Nuclear Experiment
Publish: 2025-12-04 18:49:57 UTC
Authors:
PandaX Collaboration,
Zhe Yuan,
Zihao Bo,
Wei Chen,
Xun Chen,
Yunhua Chen,
Chen Cheng,
Xiangyi Cui,
Manna Deng,
Yingjie Fan,
Deqing Fang,
Xuanye Fu,
Zhixing Gao,
Yujie Ge,
Lisheng Geng,
Karl Giboni,
Xunan Guo,
Xuyuan Guo,
Zichao Guo,
Chencheng Han,
Ke Han,
Changda He,
Jinrong He,
Houqi Huang,
Junting Huang,
Yule Huang,
Ruquan Hou,
Xiangdong Ji,
Yonglin Ju,
Xiaorun Lan,
Chenxiang Li,
Jiafu Li,
Mingchuan Li,
Peiyuan Li,
Shuaijie Li,
Tao Li,
Yangdong Li,
Zhiyuan Li,
Qing Lin,
Jianglai Liu,
Yuanchun Liu,
Congcong Lu,
Xiaoying Lu,
Lingyin Luo,
Yunyang Luo,
Yugang Ma,
Yajun Mao,
Yue Meng,
Binyu Pang,
Ningchun Qi,
Zhicheng Qian,
Xiangxiang Ren,
Dong Shan,
Xiaofeng Shang,
Xiyuan Shao,
Guofang Shen,
Manbin Shen,
Wenliang Sun,
Xuyan Sun,
Yi Tao,
Yueqiang Tian,
Yuxin Tian,
Anqing Wang,
Guanbo Wang,
Hao Wang,
Haoyu Wang,
Jiamin Wang,
Lei Wang,
Meng Wang,
Qiuhong Wang,
Shaobo Wang,
Shibo Wang,
Siguang Wang,
Wei Wang,
Xu Wang,
Zhou Wang,
Yuehuan Wei,
Weihao Wu,
Yuan Wu,
Mengjiao Xiao,
Xiang Xiao,
Kaizhi Xiong,
Jianqin Xu,
Yifan Xu,
Shunyu Yao,
Binbin Yan,
Xiyu Yan,
Yong Yang,
Peihua Ye,
Chunxu Yu,
Ying Yuan,
Youhui Yun,
Xinning Zeng,
Minzhen Zhang,
Peng Zhang,
Shibo Zhang,
Siyuan Zhang,
Shu Zhang,
Tao Zhang,
Wei Zhang,
Yang Zhang,
Yingxin Zhang,
Yuanyuan Zhang,
Li Zhao,
Kangkang Zhao,
Jifang Zhou,
Jiaxu Zhou,
Jiayi Zhou,
Ning Zhou,
Xiaopeng Zhou,
Zhizhen Zhou,
Chenhui Zhu
et al. (82 additional authors not shown)
The continuous spectrum of double beta decay ($ββ$) provides a sensitive probe to test the predictions of the Standard Model and to search for signatures of new physics beyond it. We present a comprehensive analysis of the $^{136}$Xe $ββ$ spectrum utilizing $37.8 \pm 0.6$ kg$\cdot$yr of $^{136}$Xe exposure from the PandaX-4T experiment. The analysis yields the most precise measurement to date of the $^{136}$Xe two-neutrino double beta decay ($2νββ$) half-life, $(2.14 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{21}$ years, the uncertainty of which is reduced by a factor of two compared to our previous result. We measure the parameter $ξ_{31}^{2ν}$, defined as the ratio between the subleading and leading components of the $^{136}$Xe $2νββ$ nuclear matrix element, to be $0.59^{+0.41}_{-0.38}$, which is consistent with theoretical predictions. We also search for Majoron-emitting modes of $^{136}$Xe $ββ$, establishing the most stringent limit for the spectral index $n=7$.
Subjects:
Nuclear Experiment
,
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Publish: 2025-12-04 14:32:14 UTC
Author:
Sarah Agus-Bina
The s-process in AGB stars produces elements with atomic mass numbers $A\gtrsim60$ through successive neutron captures and beta decays. In stellar environments where the s-process occurs, neutrons quickly thermalize, adopting a Maxwell-Boltzmann energy distribution determined by the local temperature independent of their production via ($α$,n) reactions. Laboratory experiments reproduce this Maxwell-Boltzmann neutron energy spectrum using (p, n) reactions. Specifically, the 7Li(p,n)7Be reaction is commonly employed to measure s-process cross-sections at kT$\approx$25 keV. Expanding the range of reactions used for measuring neutron-induced s-process cross-sections can offer valuable insights into the s-process in AGB stars. One such reaction is 18O(p,n)18F, which can be used to mimic s-process cross-sections, as its neutron energy distribution is similar to the thermal flux distribution at the stellar environment where the 13C($α$,n)16O reaction (kT = 8 keV) takes place. Heil et al. showed that the neutron energy spectrum emitted from the 18O(p,n)18F reaction at proton energy of Ep = 2582 keV, close to the reaction threshold of 2574 keV, closely resembles a Maxwellian flux with kT$\approx$5 keV. This experiment was repeated at PTB and a computational tool, OxyGen, was created to calculate the expected neutron energy spectrum and angular distribution at a planned liquid water-based 18O target at SARAF. OxyGen was incorporated into Geant4 transport simulations, which were compared to experimental results. Overall, the findings of this thesis demonstrate that the OxyGen simulation provides a reliable prediction of the neutron energy spectrum for the 18O(p,n)18F reaction and can be effectively used to plan and analyze future experiments at SARAF for different proton energies.
Subject:
Nuclear Experiment
Publish: 2025-12-03 19:08:55 UTC
Authors:
BESIII Collaboration,
M. Ablikim,
M. N. Achasov,
P. Adlarson,
X. C. Ai,
R. Aliberti,
A. Amoroso,
Q. An,
Y. Bai,
O. Bakina,
Y. Ban,
H. -R. Bao,
V. Batozskaya,
K. Begzsuren,
N. Berger,
M. Berlowski,
M. Bertani,
D. Bettoni,
F. Bianchi,
E. Bianco,
A. Bortone,
I. Boyko,
R. A. Briere,
A. Brueggemann,
H. Cai,
M. H. Cai,
X. Cai,
A. Calcaterra,
G. F. Cao,
N. Cao,
S. A. Cetin,
X. Y. Chai,
J. F. Chang,
G. R. Che,
Y. Z. Che,
C. H. Chen,
Chao Chen,
G. Chen,
H. S. Chen,
H. Y. Chen,
M. L. Chen,
S. J. Chen,
S. L. Chen,
S. M. Chen,
T. Chen,
X. R. Chen,
X. T. Chen,
X. Y. Chen,
Y. B. Chen,
Y. Q. Chen,
Y. Q. Chen,
Z. Chen,
Z. J. Chen,
Z. K. Chen,
J. C. Cheng,
S. K. Choi,
X. Chu,
G. Cibinetto,
F. Cossio,
J. Cottee-Meldrum,
J. J. Cui,
H. L. Dai,
J. P. Dai,
A. Dbeyssi,
R. E. de Boer,
D. Dedovich,
C. Q. Deng,
Z. Y. Deng,
A. Denig,
I. Denysenko,
M. Destefanis,
F. De Mori,
B. Ding,
X. X. Ding,
Y. Ding,
Y. Ding,
Y. X. Ding,
J. Dong,
L. Y. Dong,
M. Y. Dong,
X. Dong,
M. C. Du,
S. X. Du,
S. X. Du,
Y. Y. Duan,
Z. H. Duan,
P. Egorov,
G. F. Fan,
J. J. Fan,
Y. H. Fan,
J. Fang,
J. Fang,
S. S. Fang,
W. X. Fang,
Y. Q. Fang,
L. Fava,
F. Feldbauer,
G. Felici,
C. Q. Feng,
J. H. Feng,
L. Feng,
Q. X. Feng,
Y. T. Feng,
M. Fritsch,
C. D. Fu,
J. L. Fu,
Y. W. Fu,
H. Gao,
X. B. Gao,
Y. Gao,
Y. N. Gao,
Y. N. Gao,
Y. Y. Gao,
S. Garbolino,
I. Garzia,
L. Ge,
P. T. Ge,
Z. W. Ge,
C. Geng,
E. M. Gersabeck,
A. Gilman,
K. Goetzen,
J. D. Gong,
L. Gong,
W. X. Gong,
W. Gradl,
S. Gramigna,
M. Greco,
M. H. Gu,
Y. T. Gu,
C. Y. Guan,
A. Q. Guo,
L. B. Guo,
M. J. Guo,
R. P. Guo,
Y. P. Guo,
A. Guskov,
J. Gutierrez,
K. L. Han,
T. T. Han,
F. Hanisch,
K. D. Hao,
X. Q. Hao,
F. A. Harris,
K. K. He,
K. L. He,
F. H. Heinsius,
C. H. Heinz,
Y. K. Heng,
C. Herold,
P. C. Hong,
G. Y. Hou,
X. T. Hou,
Y. R. Hou,
Z. L. Hou,
H. M. Hu,
J. F. Hu,
Q. P. Hu,
S. L. Hu,
T. Hu,
Y. Hu,
Z. M. Hu,
G. S. Huang,
K. X. Huang,
L. Q. Huang,
P. Huang,
X. T. Huang,
Y. P. Huang,
Y. S. Huang,
T. Hussain,
N. Hüsken,
N. in der Wiesche,
J. Jackson,
Q. Ji,
Q. P. Ji,
W. Ji,
X. B. Ji,
X. L. Ji,
Y. Y. Ji,
Z. K. Jia,
D. Jiang,
H. B. Jiang,
P. C. Jiang,
S. J. Jiang,
T. J. Jiang,
X. S. Jiang,
Y. Jiang,
J. B. Jiao,
J. K. Jiao,
Z. Jiao,
S. Jin,
Y. Jin,
M. Q. Jing,
X. M. Jing,
T. Johansson,
S. Kabana,
N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki,
X. L. Kang,
X. S. Kang,
M. Kavatsyuk,
B. C. Ke,
V. Khachatryan,
A. Khoukaz,
R. Kiuchi,
O. B. Kolcu,
B. Kopf,
M. Kuessner,
X. Kui,
N. Kumar,
A. Kupsc,
W. Kühn,
Q. Lan,
W. N. Lan,
T. T. Lei,
M. Lellmann,
T. Lenz,
C. Li,
C. Li,
C. H. Li,
C. K. Li,
D. M. Li,
F. Li,
G. Li,
H. B. Li,
H. J. Li,
H. N. Li,
Hui Li,
J. R. Li,
J. S. Li,
K. Li,
K. L. Li,
K. L. Li,
L. J. Li,
Lei Li,
M. H. Li,
M. R. Li,
P. L. Li,
P. R. Li,
Q. M. Li,
Q. X. Li,
R. Li,
S. X. Li,
T. Li,
T. Y. Li,
W. D. Li,
W. G. Li,
X. Li,
X. H. Li,
X. L. Li,
X. Y. Li,
X. Z. Li,
Y. Li,
Y. G. Li,
Y. P. Li,
Z. J. Li,
Z. Y. Li,
C. Liang,
H. Liang,
Y. F. Liang,
Y. T. Liang,
G. R. Liao,
L. B. Liao,
M. H. Liao,
Y. P. Liao,
J. Libby,
A. Limphirat,
C. C. Lin,
D. X. Lin,
L. Q. Lin,
T. Lin,
B. J. Liu,
B. X. Liu,
C. Liu,
C. X. Liu,
F. Liu,
F. H. Liu,
Feng Liu,
G. M. Liu,
H. Liu,
H. B. Liu,
H. H. Liu,
H. M. Liu,
Huihui Liu,
J. B. Liu,
J. J. Liu,
K. Liu,
K. Liu,
K. Y. Liu,
Ke Liu,
L. C. Liu,
Lu Liu,
M. H. Liu,
M. H. Liu,
P. L. Liu,
Q. Liu,
S. B. Liu,
T. Liu,
W. K. Liu,
W. M. Liu,
W. T. Liu,
X. Liu,
X. Liu,
X. K. Liu,
X. L. Liu,
X. Y. Liu,
Y. Liu,
Y. Liu,
Yuan Liu,
Y. B. Liu,
Z. A. Liu,
Z. D. Liu,
Z. Q. Liu,
X. C. Lou,
F. X. Lu,
H. J. Lu,
J. G. Lu,
X. L. Lu,
Y. Lu,
Y. H. Lu,
Y. P. Lu,
Z. H. Lu,
C. L. Luo,
J. R. Luo,
J. S. Luo,
M. X. Luo,
T. Luo,
X. L. Luo,
Z. Y. Lv,
X. R. Lyu,
Y. F. Lyu,
Y. H. Lyu,
F. C. Ma,
H. L. Ma,
Heng Ma,
J. L. Ma,
L. L. Ma,
L. R. Ma,
Q. M. Ma,
R. Q. Ma,
R. Y. Ma,
T. Ma,
X. T. Ma,
X. Y. Ma,
Y. M. Ma,
F. E. Maas,
I. MacKay,
M. Maggiora,
S. Malde,
Q. A. Malik,
H. X. Mao,
Y. J. Mao,
Z. P. Mao,
S. Marcello,
A. Marshall,
F. M. Melendi,
Y. H. Meng,
Z. X. Meng,
G. Mezzadri,
H. Miao,
T. J. Min,
R. E. Mitchell,
X. H. Mo,
B. Moses,
N. Yu. Muchnoi,
J. Muskalla,
Y. Nefedov,
F. Nerling,
L. S. Nie,
I. B. Nikolaev,
Z. Ning,
S. Nisar,
Q. L. Niu,
W. D. Niu,
C. Normand,
S. L. Olsen,
Q. Ouyang,
S. Pacetti,
X. Pan,
Y. Pan,
A. Pathak,
Y. P. Pei,
M. Pelizaeus,
H. P. Peng,
X. J. Peng,
Y. Y. Peng,
K. Peters,
K. Petridis,
J. L. Ping,
R. G. Ping,
S. Plura,
V. Prasad,
F. Z. Qi,
H. R. Qi,
M. Qi,
S. Qian,
W. B. Qian,
C. F. Qiao,
J. H. Qiao,
J. J. Qin,
J. L. Qin,
L. Q. Qin,
L. Y. Qin,
P. B. Qin,
X. P. Qin,
X. S. Qin,
Z. H. Qin,
J. F. Qiu,
Z. H. Qu,
J. Rademacker,
K. Ravindran,
C. F. Redmer,
A. Rivetti,
M. Rolo,
G. Rong,
S. S. Rong,
F. Rosini,
Ch. Rosner,
M. Q. Ruan,
N. Salone,
A. Sarantsev,
Y. Schelhaas,
K. Schoenning,
M. Scodeggio,
K. Y. Shan,
W. Shan,
X. Y. Shan,
Z. J. Shang,
J. F. Shangguan,
L. G. Shao,
M. Shao,
C. P. Shen,
H. F. Shen,
W. H. Shen,
X. Y. Shen,
B. A. Shi,
H. Shi,
J. L. Shi,
J. Y. Shi,
S. Y. Shi,
X. Shi,
H. L. Song,
J. J. Song,
T. Z. Song,
W. M. Song,
Y. J. Song,
Y. X. Song,
Zirong Song,
S. Sosio,
S. Spataro,
S. Stansilaus,
F. Stieler,
S. S Su,
Y. J. Su,
G. B. Sun,
G. X. Sun,
H. Sun,
H. K. Sun,
J. F. Sun,
K. Sun,
L. Sun,
S. S. Sun,
T. Sun,
Y. C. Sun,
Y. H. Sun,
Y. J. Sun,
Y. Z. Sun,
Z. Q. Sun,
Z. T. Sun,
C. J. Tang,
G. Y. Tang,
J. Tang,
J. J. Tang,
L. F. Tang,
Y. A. Tang,
L. Y. Tao,
M. Tat,
J. X. Teng,
J. Y. Tian,
W. H. Tian,
Y. Tian,
Z. F. Tian,
I. Uman,
B. Wang,
B. Wang,
Bo Wang,
C. Wang,
C. Wang,
Cong Wang,
D. Y. Wang,
H. J. Wang,
J. J. Wang,
K. Wang,
L. L. Wang,
L. W. Wang,
M. Wang,
M. Wang,
N. Y. Wang,
S. Wang,
T. Wang,
T. J. Wang,
W. Wang,
Wei Wang,
W. P. Wang,
X. Wang,
X. F. Wang,
X. J. Wang,
X. L. Wang,
X. N. Wang,
Y. Wang,
Y. D. Wang,
Y. F. Wang,
Y. H. Wang,
Y. J. Wang,
Y. L. Wang,
Y. N. Wang,
Y. Q. Wang,
Yaqian Wang,
Yi Wang,
Yuan Wang,
Z. Wang,
Z. L. Wang,
Z. L. Wang,
Z. Q. Wang,
Z. Y. Wang,
D. H. Wei,
H. R. Wei,
F. Weidner,
S. P. Wen,
Y. R. Wen,
U. Wiedner,
G. Wilkinson,
M. Wolke,
C. Wu,
J. F. Wu,
L. H. Wu,
L. J. Wu,
L. J. Wu,
Lianjie Wu,
S. G. Wu,
S. M. Wu,
X. Wu,
X. H. Wu,
Y. J. Wu,
Z. Wu,
L. Xia,
X. M. Xian,
B. H. Xiang,
D. Xiao,
G. Y. Xiao,
H. Xiao,
Y. L. Xiao,
Z. J. Xiao,
C. Xie,
K. J. Xie,
X. H. Xie,
Y. Xie,
Y. G. Xie,
Y. H. Xie,
Z. P. Xie,
T. Y. Xing,
C. F. Xu,
C. J. Xu,
G. F. Xu,
H. Y. Xu,
H. Y. Xu,
M. Xu,
Q. J. Xu,
Q. N. Xu,
T. D. Xu,
W. Xu,
W. L. Xu,
X. P. Xu,
Y. Xu,
Y. Xu,
Y. C. Xu,
Z. S. Xu,
F. Yan,
H. Y. Yan,
L. Yan,
W. B. Yan,
W. C. Yan,
W. H. Yan,
W. P. Yan,
X. Q. Yan,
H. J. Yang,
H. L. Yang,
H. X. Yang,
J. H. Yang,
R. J. Yang,
T. Yang,
Y. Yang,
Y. F. Yang,
Y. H. Yang,
Y. Q. Yang,
Y. X. Yang,
Y. Z. Yang,
M. Ye,
M. H. Ye,
Z. J. Ye,
Junhao Yin,
Z. Y. You,
B. X. Yu,
C. X. Yu,
G. Yu,
J. S. Yu,
L. Q. Yu,
M. C. Yu,
T. Yu,
X. D. Yu,
Y. C. Yu,
C. Z. Yuan,
H. Yuan,
J. Yuan,
J. Yuan,
L. Yuan,
S. C. Yuan,
S. H. Yuan,
X. Q. Yuan,
Y. Yuan,
Z. Y. Yuan,
C. X. Yue,
Ying Yue,
A. A. Zafar,
S. H. Zeng,
X. Zeng,
Y. Zeng,
Yujie Zeng,
Y. J. Zeng,
X. Y. Zhai,
Y. H. Zhan,
Shunan Zhang,
A. Q. Zhang,
B. L. Zhang,
B. X. Zhang,
D. H. Zhang,
G. Y. Zhang,
G. Y. Zhang,
H. Zhang,
H. Zhang,
H. C. Zhang,
H. H. Zhang,
H. Q. Zhang,
H. R. Zhang,
H. Y. Zhang,
Jin Zhang,
J. Zhang,
J. J. Zhang,
J. L. Zhang,
J. Q. Zhang,
J. S. Zhang,
J. W. Zhang,
J. X. Zhang,
J. Y. Zhang,
J. Z. Zhang,
Jianyu Zhang,
L. M. Zhang,
Lei Zhang,
N. Zhang,
P. Zhang,
Q. Zhang,
Q. Y. Zhang,
R. Y. Zhang,
S. H. Zhang,
Shulei Zhang,
X. M. Zhang,
X. Y Zhang,
X. Y. Zhang,
Y. Zhang,
Y. Zhang,
Y. T. Zhang,
Y. H. Zhang,
Y. M. Zhang,
Y. P. Zhang,
Z. D. Zhang,
Z. H. Zhang,
Z. L. Zhang,
Z. L. Zhang,
Z. X. Zhang,
Z. Y. Zhang,
Z. Y. Zhang,
Z. Z. Zhang,
Zh. Zh. Zhang,
G. Zhao,
J. Y. Zhao,
J. Z. Zhao,
L. Zhao,
L. Zhao,
M. G. Zhao,
N. Zhao,
R. P. Zhao,
S. J. Zhao,
Y. B. Zhao,
Y. L. Zhao,
Y. X. Zhao,
Z. G. Zhao,
A. Zhemchugov,
B. Zheng,
B. M. Zheng,
J. P. Zheng,
W. J. Zheng,
X. R. Zheng,
Y. H. Zheng,
B. Zhong,
C. Zhong,
H. Zhou,
J. Q. Zhou,
J. Y. Zhou,
S. Zhou,
X. Zhou,
X. K. Zhou,
X. R. Zhou,
X. Y. Zhou,
Y. X. Zhou,
Y. Z. Zhou,
A. N. Zhu,
J. Zhu,
K. Zhu,
K. J. Zhu,
K. S. Zhu,
L. Zhu,
L. X. Zhu,
S. H. Zhu,
T. J. Zhu,
W. D. Zhu,
W. D. Zhu,
W. J. Zhu,
W. Z. Zhu,
Y. C. Zhu,
Z. A. Zhu,
X. Y. Zhuang,
J. H. Zou,
J. Zu
et al. (702 additional authors not shown)
Using $(10087\pm44)\times10^{6}$$J/ψ$ events collected with the BESIII detector operating at the BEPCII storage ring in $2009$, $2012$, $2018$, and $2019$, we perform a search for the reaction $Ξ^0n\rightarrowΛΛX$, where $X$ denotes any additional final particles. Given the highly suppressed phase space for producing extra pions, the $X$ consists of either nothing or a photon, corresponding to the processes $Ξ^0 n \rightarrow ΛΛ$ and $Ξ^{0}n\rightarrowΛΣ^0\rightarrowΛΛγ$. The $Ξ^0$ comes from the decay of $J/ψ\rightarrowΞ^0\barΞ^0$, while the neutron originates from material of the beam pipe. A signal is observed for the first time with a statistical significance of 6.4$σ$. The cross section for the reaction $Ξ^0+{^9\rm{Be}}\rightarrowΛ+Λ+X$ is measured to be $(43.6\pm10.5_{\text{stat}}\pm11.1_{\text{syst}})$ mb at $P_{Ξ^0}\approx0.818$ GeV/$c$, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic. No significant $H$-dibaryon signal is observed in the $ΛΛ$ final state.
Subjects:
High Energy Physics - Experiment
,
Nuclear Experiment
Publish: 2025-12-04 11:50:30 UTC
Authors:
Rongzhe Hu,
Nicolas Michel,
Zhicheng Xu,
Jianguo Li,
Furong Xu
Broad resonances are a unique phenomenon in nuclear many-body systems. Theoretical studies usually involve the continuum degree of freedom, which drastically increases the model space of calculations, and may lead to non-convergence or instability of computations. In this paper, we present the extension of the eigenvector continuation (EC) method to the complex-energy space to treat the broad resonances of open quantum systems of nuclei. EC provides an efficient method to predict the solution of a large-space many-body problem within a small subspace. Using only a few bound and narrow resonance solutions as input in EC, we can obtain the solution of a broad resonance. We have applied the complex-energy EC to the broad resonances of $^4$H, four-neutron $^4n$, $^6$He and $^7$He systems.
Subjects:
Nuclear Theory
,
Nuclear Experiment
Publish: 2025-12-04 06:58:36 UTC
Author:
G. Ramalho
The second excitation of the nucleon, the Roper, has properties differentiated from other low-lying nucleon resonances. Their properties challenge our understanding of the structure of the baryons in terms of the degrees of freedom from QCD. In the present work we discuss the properties of the Roper resonance and the nucleon to Roper electromagnetic transition, based on the quark degrees of freedom, that are expected to dominate for large square momentum transfer $Q^2$. We also discuss the analytic structure of the transition amplitudes in the low-$Q^2$ region, and how the contributions of baryon-meson states can help to describe the low and intermediate $Q^2$ data, and the nature of the Roper.
Subjects:
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
,
High Energy Physics - Experiment
,
High Energy Physics - Lattice
,
Nuclear Experiment
,
Nuclear Theory
Publish: 2025-12-04 05:57:49 UTC
Authors:
Volker Koch,
Volodymyr Vovchenko
The exploration of the Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) phase diagram is a central goal of relativistic heavy-ion collision experiments. This review focuses on the role of fluctuations and correlations as sensitive probes of the phase structure. We discuss theoretical advancements and experimental methodologies employed to map the QCD phase diagram, highlighting constraints derived from both lattice QCD calculations and existing experimental data. Key observables such as cumulants and factorial cumulants of conserved charges (e.g., net-proton, net-charge) are explored as promising signatures of phase transitions and the QCD critical point. We discuss how these quantities are measured experimentally and compared with theoretical predictions, addressing challenges and best practices for meaningful comparisons. Special attention is given to predictions and current experimental results at high baryon density, including recent findings from the STAR collaboration at RHIC. Finally, we identify open issues and future directions for fluctuation and correlation studies at lower collision energies, relevant for future measurements, for example by the CBM experiment.
Subjects:
Nuclear Theory
,
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
,
Nuclear Experiment
Publish: 2025-12-03 22:01:05 UTC
Authors:
Bao-Jun Cai,
Bao-An Li,
Yu-Gang Ma
Nucleon short-range correlations (SRCs) and their high-momentum tails (HMTs) encode key short-range dynamics in nuclei and dense matter. This review provides a concise overview of SRC features relevant to the Equation of State (EOS) of isospin-asymmetric nuclear matter. We summarize empirical and theoretical properties of the single-nucleon momentum distribution $n(k)$, emphasizing the role of the neutron--proton tensor force, the dominance of correlated np pairs, and the enhancement of minority-species HMTs. Links to nucleon effective E-masses, quasi-deuteron components, and orbital entanglement are briefly noted. We examine how SRC-induced HMTs modify kinetic and potential contributions to the EOS in both non-relativistic and relativistic frameworks, including the softening of the kinetic symmetry energy and departures from the isospin parabolic approximation of asymmetric nuclear EOS. Sensitivity to high-momentum components and generalizations to arbitrary dimensions are also highlighted. Implications for heavy-ion reactions are summarized, including effects on particle yields, collective flows, deeply sub-threshold particle production and hard photon emission, driven by modified initial nucleon momentum distributions and abundant high relative-momentum np pairs during the reaction. Finally, we outline SRC-HMT consequences for neutron-star matter, covering proton fractions, tidal deformabilities, $Z$-factors, cooling, and the core--crust transition, as well as possible connections to dark-matter interactions in dense environments.
Subjects:
Nuclear Theory
,
High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena
,
High Energy Physics - Theory
,
Nuclear Experiment
Publish: 2025-12-03 19:25:25 UTC
Author:
GlueX Collaboration
Based on 334 pb$^{-1}$ of photoproduction data collected with the GlueX detector at Jefferson Lab, we have measured for the first time the cross section of the exclusive reaction $γ+ p \to φ(1020) π^+π^- p$ by reconstructing the final state $K^+K^- π^+π^- p$ produced with a photon beam of energies between $8.0 {\rm GeV}$ and $11.6 {\rm GeV}$. Based on the measured differential cross section, we have performed a search for the strangeonium-like exotic candidate $Y(2175)$, recently renamed to $φ(2170)$. This state has been reported by different $e^+e^-$ annihilation experiments and it is addressed here for the first time in a photoproduction experiment. We do not find evidence for this state when using the resonance parameters quoted by the Particle Data Group and provide upper limits on the photoproduction cross section. Instead, we find a structure at a mass of $m(φπ^+π^-)= 2.24$ GeV/$c^2$ with a statistical significance of about 5 $σ$. The parameters of this structure differ from those quoted by the Particle Data Group for the $φ(2170)$ and are consistent with a previous observation in $e^+e^-$ annihilation. In addition, there is evidence for a second structure at 1.82 GeV/$c^2$.
Subjects:
High Energy Physics - Experiment
,
Nuclear Experiment
Publish: 2025-12-03 15:11:16 UTC