Authors:
MicroBooNE collaboration,
P. Abratenko,
D. Andrade Aldana,
J. Asaadi,
A. Ashkenazi,
S. Balasubramanian,
B. Baller,
A. Barnard,
G. Barr,
D. Barrow,
J. Barrow,
V. Basque,
J. Bateman,
B. Behera,
O. Benevides Rodrigues,
S. Berkman,
A. Bhat,
M. Bhattacharya,
V. Bhelande,
A. Binau,
M. Bishai,
A. Blake,
B. Bogart,
T. Bolton,
M. B. Brunetti,
L. Camilleri,
D. Caratelli,
F. Cavanna,
G. Cerati,
A. Chappell,
Y. Chen,
J. M. Conrad,
M. Convery,
L. Cooper-Troendle,
J. I. Crespo-Anadon,
R. Cross,
M. Del Tutto,
S. R. Dennis,
P. Detje,
R. Diurba,
Z. Djurcic,
K. Duffy,
S. Dytman,
B. Eberly,
P. Englezos,
A. Ereditato,
J. J. Evans,
C. Fang,
B. T. Fleming,
W. Foreman,
D. Franco,
A. P. Furmanski,
F. Gao,
D. Garcia-Gamez,
S. Gardiner,
G. Ge,
S. Gollapinni,
E. Gramellini,
P. Green,
H. Greenlee,
L. Gu,
W. Gu,
R. Guenette,
L. Hagaman,
M. D. Handley,
O. Hen,
A. Hergenhan,
M. Harrison,
S. Hawkins,
C. Hilgenberg,
G. A. Horton-Smith,
A. Hussain,
B. Irwin,
M. S. Ismail,
C. James,
X. Ji,
J. H. Jo,
A. Johnson,
R. A. Johnson,
D. Kalra,
G. Karagiorgi,
W. Ketchum,
A. Kelly,
M. Kirby,
T. Kobilarcik,
K. Kumar,
N. Lane,
J. -Y. Li,
Y. Li,
K. Lin,
B. R. Littlejohn,
L. Liu,
S. Liu,
W. C. Louis,
X. Luo,
T. Mahmud,
N. Majeed,
C. Mariani,
J. Marshall,
D. A. Martinez Caicedo,
F. Martinez Lopez,
M. G. Manuel Alves,
S. Martynenko,
A. Mastbaum,
I. Mawby,
N. McConkey,
B. McConnell,
L. Mellet,
J. Mendez,
J. Micallef,
T. Mohayai,
A. Mogan,
M. Mooney,
A. F. Moor,
C. D. Moore,
L. Mora Lepin,
M. A. Hernandez Morquecho,
M. M. Moudgalya,
S. Mulleria Babu,
D. Naples,
A. Navrer-Agasson,
N. Nayak,
M. Nebot-Guinot,
C. Nguyen,
L. Nguyen,
J. Nowak,
N. Oza,
O. Palamara,
N. Pallat,
V. Paolone,
A. Papadopoulou,
V. Papavassiliou,
H. Parkinson,
S. F. Pate,
N. Patel,
Z. Pavlovic,
E. Piasetzky,
K. Pletcher,
I. Pophale,
X. Qian,
J. L. Raaf,
V. Radeka,
A. Rafique,
M. Reggiani-Guzzo,
J. Rodriguez Rondon,
M. Rosenberg,
M. Ross-Lonergan,
I. Safa,
C. Sauer,
D. W. Schmitz,
A. Schukraft,
W. Seligman,
M. H. Shaevitz,
R. Sharankova,
J. Shi,
L. Silva,
E. L. Snider,
S. Soldner-Rembold,
J. Spitz,
M. Stancari,
J. St. John,
T. Strauss,
A. M. Szelc,
N. Taniuchi,
K. Terao,
C. Thorpe,
D. Torbunov,
D. Totani,
M. Toups,
A. Trettin,
Y. -T. Tsai,
J. Tyler,
M. A. Uchida,
T. Usher,
B. Viren,
J. Wang,
L. Wang,
M. Weber,
H. Wei,
A. J. White,
S. Wolbers,
T. Wongjirad,
K. Wresilo,
W. Wu,
E. Yandel,
T. Yang,
L. E. Yates,
H. W. Yu,
G. P. Zeller,
J. Zennamo,
C. Zhang,
Y. Zhang
et al. (162 additional authors not shown)
We report a measurement of the charged-current coherent pion production cross section on argon using the MicroBooNE liquid argon time projection chamber exposed to the Booster Neutrino Beam at Fermilab. The measurement uses the MicroBooNE data set corresponding to $1.26 \times 10^{21}$ protons on target with a mean neutrino energy of $0.8$~GeV. The flux-averaged cross section is measured to be $(9.1 \pm 1.2_{\text{stat}} \pm 1.2_\text{syst}) \times 10^{-40}\,\text{cm}^2/\text{Ar}$. This result represents the first measurement of charged-current coherent pion production on argon at sub-GeV neutrino energies. Due to its clean two-body kinematics, where the neutrino interacts coherently with the entire nucleus producing a forward muon and pion with no nuclear breakup, this process provides a useful tool for constraining neutrino flux uncertainties in current and future oscillation experiments such as DUNE.
Subject:
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Publish: 2026-06-11 17:25:22 UTC
Authors:
Antonio J. Costa,
Caterina Doglioni,
Christian Gütschow,
Andrew D. Pilkington,
Sukanya Sinha
Particle physics collider experiments provide Rivet routines as part of the analysis preservation strategy for model-independent measurements. Rivet is a C++ toolkit that allow new theoretical models to be compared to the measurements, thus aiding the development and tuning of Monte Carlo event generators as well as searches for physics beyond the Standard Model. However, analysis coverage is known to be incomplete, with only 39% of measurements having documented and publicly available Rivet routines. In this article, we design and implement an automated workflow based on Large Language Models with the goal of providing the missing routines. This multi-step workflow, referred to as AgentRivet, extracts the physics analysis information from published papers and writes the missing Rivet routines, with intermediate code- and physics- reviews as part of an autonomous quality control. We report the results obtained using commercial Large Language Models, provided by OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google, for two recent measurements from the ATLAS and CMS experiments. We find that AgentRivet produces competent Rivet routines with few syntax errors. The physics fidelity of the routines is reasonable and follows the explanations given in the relevant publications. Nevertheless, physics-implementation issues do arise and are investigated using the artefacts produced by AgentRivet. The majority of physics implementation issues arise from subtle-but-ambiguous definitions in the given publication, although some models struggle to implement complex observables even when clear definitions are given.
Subjects:
High Energy Physics - Experiment
,
Artificial Intelligence
,
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Publish: 2026-06-11 16:22:40 UTC
Authors:
Akitaka Ariga,
Tomoko Ariga,
Jeremy Atkinson,
Jamie Boyd,
Kohei Chinone,
Radu Dobre,
Elena Firu,
Haruhi Fujimori,
Stephen Gibson,
Daiki Hayakawa,
Enrique Kajomovitz,
Alex Keyken,
Umut Kose,
Laurie Nevay,
Ken Ohashi,
Simon Thor
The Forward Physics Facility (FPF) at the High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) will enable high-statistics measurements of TeV-scale neutrinos, but the intense flux of forward muons poses a major challenge for neutrino detectors in the far-forward region. We investigate the suppression of background muons using sweeper magnets with a simulation framework combining SIBYLL event generation, BDSIM beam transport, Geant4 particle tracking, and realistic magnetic field maps. Starting from a muon flux of $3.8\times10^3~\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$ per $\mathrm{fb^{-1}}$ without magnets, a magnet in the LHC tunnel alone achieves the target level of $2\times10^3~\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$ per $\mathrm{fb^{-1}}$. Additional magnets at the TI18 tunnel and FPF entrance further reduce the flux to $1.5\times10^3~\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$ per $\mathrm{fb^{-1}}$ in the optimized configuration. These results demonstrate that a properly optimized multi-stage sweeper magnet system can significantly reduce the forward muon background, while also highlighting the importance of realistic transport simulations and geometrical constraints in achieving further suppression.
Subject:
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Publish: 2026-06-11 08:48:21 UTC
Authors:
Belle,
Belle II Collaborations,
M. Abumusabh,
A. Aggarwal,
H. Ahmed,
J. K. Ahn,
Y. Ahn,
M. Akdag,
N. Akopov,
S. Alghamdi,
M. Alhakami,
N. Althubiti,
K. Amos,
M. Angelsmark,
N. Anh Ky,
C. Antonioli,
K. Arai,
H. Atmacan,
V. Aushev,
R. Ayad,
V. Babu,
H. Bae,
N. K. Baghel,
S. Bahinipati,
P. Bambade,
Sw. Banerjee,
M. Barrett,
M. Bartl,
J. Baudot,
A. Beaubien,
F. Becherer,
J. Becker,
G. F. Benfratello,
J. V. Bennett,
F. U. Bernlochner,
V. Bertacchi,
M. Bertemes,
E. Bertholet,
M. Bessner,
S. Bettarini,
V. Bhardwaj,
B. Bhuyan,
F. Bianchi,
T. Bilka,
D. Biswas,
A. Bobrov,
D. Bodrov,
G. Bonvicini,
J. Borah,
A. Boschetti,
A. Bozek,
M. Bračko,
P. Branchini,
R. A. Briere,
T. E. Browder,
A. Budano,
S. Bussino,
Q. Campagna,
M. Campajola,
M. Carminati,
G. Casarosa,
C. Cecchi,
P. Cheema,
L. Chen,
B. G. Cheon,
C. Cheshta,
H. Chetri,
K. Chilikin,
K. Chirapatpimol,
H. -E. Cho,
K. Cho,
S. -J. Cho,
S. -K. Choi,
S. Choudhury,
S. Chutia,
J. Cochran,
J. A. Colorado-Caicedo,
I. Consigny,
L. Corona,
S. Cuccuini,
J. X. Cui,
E. De La Cruz-Burelo,
S. A. De La Motte,
G. De Nardo,
G. De Pietro,
R. de Sangro,
M. Destefanis,
S. Dey,
R. Dhayal,
A. Di Canto,
J. Dingfelder,
Z. Doležal,
X. Dong,
M. Dorigo,
G. Dujany,
P. Ecker,
D. Epifanov,
J. Eppelt,
R. Farkas,
P. Feichtinger,
T. Ferber,
T. Fillinger,
C. Finck,
G. Finocchiaro,
F. Forti,
B. G. Fulsom,
P. Gagneja,
R. Garg,
A. Garmash,
G. Gaudino,
V. Gaur,
V. Gautam,
A. Gaz,
A. Gellrich,
G. Ghevondyan,
D. Ghosh,
H. Ghumaryan,
R. Giordano,
A. Giri,
P. Gironella Gironell,
B. Gobbo,
R. Godang,
O. Gogota,
W. Gradl,
E. Graziani,
D. Greenwald,
K. Gudkova,
Y. Han,
K. Hayasaka,
H. Hayashii,
S. Hazra,
C. Hearty,
M. T. Hedges,
A. Heidelbach,
G. Heine,
I. Heredia de la Cruz,
T. Higuchi,
M. Hoek,
M. Hohmann,
R. Hoppe,
P. Horak,
X. T. Hou,
C. -L. Hsu,
T. Humair,
T. Iijima,
K. Inami,
N. Ipsita,
A. Ishikawa,
R. Itoh,
M. Iwasaki,
P. Jackson,
D. Jacobi,
W. W. Jacobs,
E. -J. Jang,
Q. P. Ji,
S. Jia,
Y. Jin,
A. Johnson,
K. K. Joo,
H. Kakuno,
K. H. Kang,
G. Karyan,
F. Keil,
C. Ketter,
C. Kiesling,
C. Kim,
D. Y. Kim,
H. Kim,
J. -Y. Kim,
K. -H. Kim,
H. Kindo,
K. Kinoshita,
P. Kodyš,
S. Kohani,
A. Korobov,
S. Korpar,
E. Kovalenko,
R. Kowalewski,
P. Križan,
P. Krokovny,
T. Kuhr,
Y. Kulii,
R. Kumar,
K. Kumara,
T. Kunigo,
S. Kurokawa,
A. Kuzmin,
Y. -J. Kwon,
S. Lacaprara,
Y. -T. Lai,
T. Lam,
J. S. Lange,
T. S. Lau,
R. Leboucher,
M. J. Lee,
P. Leo,
P. M. Lewis,
C. Li,
L. K. Li,
Q. M. Li,
S. X. Li,
W. Z. Li,
Y. Li,
Y. B. Li,
Y. P. Liao,
J. Libby,
J. Lin,
S. Lin,
Z. Liptak,
V. Lisovskyi,
C. Liu,
M. H. Liu,
Q. Y. Liu,
Z. Q. Liu,
D. Liventsev,
S. Longo,
A. Lozar,
T. Lueck,
C. Lyu,
J. L. Ma,
Y. Ma,
M. Maggiora,
S. P. Maharana,
R. Maiti,
G. Mancinelli,
R. Manfredi,
E. Manoni,
M. Mantovano,
D. Marcantonio,
S. Marcello,
M. Marfoli,
C. Marinas,
C. Martellini,
A. Martens,
T. Martinov,
L. Massaccesi,
M. Masuda,
T. Matsuda,
D. Matvienko,
S. K. Maurya,
M. Maushart,
J. A. McKenna,
Z. Mediankin Gruberová,
R. Mehta,
F. Meier,
D. Meleshko,
M. Merola,
C. Miller,
M. Mirra,
K. Miyabayashi,
H. Miyake,
R. Mizuk,
S. Moneta,
A. L. Moreira de Carvalho,
H. -G. Moser,
N. Mudgal,
Th. Muller,
H. Murakami,
R. Mussa,
M. Nakao,
Y. Nakazawa,
Z. Natkaniec,
A. Natochii,
M. Nayak,
M. Neu,
M. Niiyama,
S. Nishida,
R. Nomaru,
S. Ogawa,
R. Okubo,
H. Ono,
G. Pakhlova,
S. Pardi,
J. Park,
K. Park,
S. -H. Park,
A. Passeri,
S. Patra,
T. K. Pedlar,
L. E. Piilonen,
P. L. M. Podesta-Lerma,
T. Podobnik,
L. Polat,
A. Prakash,
R. pramanik,
V. Prasad,
S. Prell,
E. Prencipe,
M. T. Prim,
H. Purwar,
P. Rados,
S. Raiz,
K. Ravindran,
J. U. Rehman,
M. Reif,
S. Reiter,
M. Remnev,
L. Reuter,
D. Ricalde Herrmann,
I. Ripp-Baudot,
G. Rizzo,
S. H. Robertson,
J. M. Roney,
A. Rostomyan,
N. Rout,
G. Russo,
S. Saha,
G. Sanchez,
D. A. Sanders,
S. Sandilya,
L. Santelj,
C. Santos,
V. Savinov,
B. Scavino,
J. Schmitz,
S. Schneider,
G. Schnell,
K. Schoenning,
C. Schwanda,
Y. Seino,
K. Senyo,
J. Serrano,
C. Sfienti,
W. Shan,
C. P. Shen,
X. D. Shi,
T. Shillington,
T. Shimasaki,
J. -G. Shiu,
D. Shtol,
A. Sibidanov,
F. Simon,
J. B. Singh,
J. Skorupa,
A. Soffer,
A. Sokolov,
E. Solovieva,
S. Spataro,
K. Špenko,
B. Spruck,
M. Starič,
P. Stavroulakis,
S. Stefkova,
R. Stroili,
M. Sumihama,
M. Takahashi,
M. Takizawa,
U. Tamponi,
S. S. Tang,
K. Tanida,
F. Testa,
A. Thaller,
D. V. Thanh,
T. Tien Manh,
O. Tittel,
R. Tiwary,
E. Torassa,
F. F. Trantou,
I. Tsaklidis,
M. Uchida,
I. Ueda,
T. Uglov,
K. Unger,
Y. Unno,
K. Uno,
S. Uno,
Y. Ushiroda,
R. van Tonder,
K. E. Varvell,
M. Veronesi,
A. Vinokurova,
V. S. Vismaya,
L. Vitale,
V. Vobbilisetti,
R. Volpe,
M. Wakai,
S. Wallner,
M. -Z. Wang,
A. Warburton,
M. Watanabe,
S. Watanuki,
C. Wessel,
X. P. Xu,
B. D. Yabsley,
S. Yamada,
W. Yan,
W. P. Yan,
J. Yelton,
K. Yi,
J. H. Yin,
K. Yoshihara,
C. Z. Yuan,
J. Yuan,
L. Yuan,
Y. Yusa,
L. Zani,
F. Zeng,
M. Zeyrek,
B. Zhang,
X. Zhao,
V. Zhilich,
J. S. Zhou,
Q. D. Zhou,
L. Zhu,
R. Žlebčík
et al. (376 additional authors not shown)
We report the first observation of the decays $B^{+} \to Σ_{c}(2455)^{++} \barΞ_{c}^{\prime-}$ and $B^{0} \to Σ_{c}(2455)^{0} \barΞ_{c}^{\prime0}$, with significances of $6.4\,σ$ and $5.3\, σ$, respectively, including systematic uncertainties. This analysis is based on data samples containing $771.6 \times 10^{6}$ $Υ(4S)$ decays collected with the Belle detector at the KEKB collider and $520.6 \times 10^{6}$ $Υ(4S)$ decays collected with the Belle~II detector at the SuperKEKB collider. The branching fractions are measured to be $\mathcal{B}(B^+ \to Σ_c(2455)^{++} \barΞ_c^{\prime -}) = (1.68 \pm 0.31 \pm 0.12^{+1.49}_{-0.54}) \times 10^{-3}$ and $\mathcal{B}(B^0 \to Σ_c(2455)^{0} \barΞ_c^{\prime 0}) = (1.28 \pm 0.32 \pm 0.10^{+0.30}_{-0.21}) \times 10^{-3}$, where the first and second uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively, and the third arises from the uncertainties in the absolute branching fractions of $\barΞ_{c}^{-}$ and $\barΞ_{c}^{0}$ decays. This result represents the first observation of $B$-meson decays into a pair of charmed baryon-antibaryon states belonging to the same $SU(3)$ flavor sextet.
Subject:
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Publish: 2026-06-11 05:00:05 UTC
Authors:
BESIII Collaboration,
M. Ablikim,
M. N. Achasov,
P. Adlarson,
X. C. Ai,
C. S. Akondi,
R. Aliberti,
A. Amoroso,
Q. An,
Y. H. An,
M. S. Anderson,
Y. Bai,
O. Bakina,
H. R. Bao,
X. L. Bao,
M. Barbagiovanni,
V. Batozskaya,
K. Begzsuren,
N. Berger,
M. Berlowski,
M. B. Bertani,
D. Bettoni,
F. Bianchi,
E. Bianco,
A. Bortone,
I. Boyko,
R. A. Briere,
A. Brueggemann,
D. Cabiati,
H. Cai,
M. H. Cai,
X. Cai,
A. Calcaterra,
G. F. Cao,
N. Cao,
S. A. Cetin,
X. Y. Chai,
J. F. Chang,
T. T. Chang,
G. R. Che,
Y. Z. Che,
C. H. Chen,
Chao Chen,
G. Chen,
H. S. Chen,
H. Y. Chen,
M. L. Chen,
S. J. Chen,
S. M. Chen,
T. Chen,
W. Chen,
X. R. Chen,
X. T. Chen,
X. Y. Chen,
Y. B. Chen,
Y. Q. Chen,
Z. K. Chen,
J. Cheng,
L. N. Cheng,
S. K. Choi,
X. Chu,
G. Cibinetto,
F. Cossio,
J. Cottee-Meldrum,
H. L. Dai,
J. P. Dai,
X. C. Dai,
A. Dbeyssi,
R. E. de Boer,
D. Dedovich,
C. Q. Deng,
Z. Y. Deng,
A. Denig,
I. Denisenko,
M. Destefanis,
F. De Mori,
E. Di Fiore,
X. X. Ding,
Y. Ding,
Y. X. Ding,
J. Dong,
L. Y. Dong,
M. Y. Dong,
X. Dong,
Z. J. Dong,
M. C. Du,
S. X. Du,
Shaoxu Du,
X. L. Du,
Y. Q. Du,
Y. Y. Duan,
Z. H. Duan,
P. Egorov,
G. F. Fan,
J. J. Fan,
Y. H. Fan,
J. Fang,
Jin Fang,
S. S. Fang,
W. X. Fang,
Y. Q. Fang,
L. Fava,
F. Feldbauer,
G. Felici,
C. Q. Feng,
J. H. Feng,
Q. X. Feng,
Y. T. Feng,
M. Fritsch,
C. D. Fu,
J. L. Fu,
Y. W. Fu,
H. Gao,
Xu Gao,
Y. Gao,
Y. N. Gao,
Y. Y. Gao,
Yunong Gao,
Z. Gao,
S. Garbolino,
I. Garzia,
L. Ge,
P. T. Ge,
Z. W. Ge,
C. Geng,
A. Gilman,
K. Goetzen,
J. Gollub,
J. B. Gong,
J. D. Gong,
L. Gong,
W. X. Gong,
W. Gradl,
M. Greco,
M. D. Gu,
M. H. Gu,
C. Y. Guan,
A. Q. Guo,
H. Guo,
J. N. Guo,
L. B. Guo,
M. J. Guo,
R. P. Guo,
X. Guo,
Y. P. Guo,
Z. Guo,
A. Guskov,
J. Gutierrez,
J. Y. Han,
T. T. Han,
X. Han,
F. Hanisch,
K. D. Hao,
X. Q. Hao,
F. A. Harris,
C. Z. He,
K. K. He,
K. L. He,
F. H. Heinsius,
C. H. Heinz,
Y. K. Heng,
C. Herold,
P. C. Hong,
G. Y. Hou,
X. T. Hou,
Y. R. Hou,
Z. L. Hou,
H. M. Hu,
J. F. Hu,
Q. P. Hu,
S. L. Hu,
T. Hu,
Y. Hu,
Y. X. Hu,
Z. M. Hu,
G. S. Huang,
K. X. Huang,
L. Q. Huang,
P. Huang,
X. T. Huang,
Y. P. Huang,
Y. S. Huang,
T. Hussain,
N. Hüsken,
N. in der Wiesche,
J. Jackson,
Q. Ji,
Q. P. Ji,
W. Ji,
X. B. Ji,
X. L. Ji,
Y. Y. Ji,
L. K. Jia,
X. Q. Jia,
D. Jiang,
S. J. Jiang,
X. S. Jiang,
Y. Jiang,
J. B. Jiao,
J. K. Jiao,
Z. Jiao,
L. C. L. Jin,
S. Jin,
Y. Jin,
M. Q. Jing,
X. M. Jing,
T. Johansson,
S. Kabana,
X. L. Kang,
X. S. Kang,
B. C. Ke,
V. Khachatryan,
A. Khoukaz,
O. B. Kolcu,
B. Kopf,
L. Kröger,
L. Krümmel,
Y. Y. Kuang,
X. Kui,
N. Kumar,
A. Kupsc,
W. Kühn,
Q. Lan,
W. N. Lan,
T. T. Lei,
M. Lellmann,
T. Lenz,
C. Li,
C. H. Li,
C. K. Li,
Chunkai Li,
Cong Li,
D. M. Li,
F. Li,
G. Li,
H. B. Li,
H. J. Li,
H. L. Li,
H. N. Li,
H. P. Li,
Hui Li,
J. N. Li,
J. S. Li,
J. W. Li,
K. Li,
K. L. Li,
L. J. Li,
L. K. Li,
Lei Li,
M. H. Li,
M. R. Li,
M. T. Li,
P. L. Li,
P. R. Li,
Q. M. Li,
Q. X. Li,
R. Li,
S. Li,
S. X. Li,
S. Y. Li,
Shanshan Li,
T. Li,
T. Y. Li,
W. D. Li,
W. G. Li,
X. Li,
X. H. Li,
X. K. Li,
X. L. Li,
X. Y. Li,
X. Z. Li,
Y. Li,
Y. H. Li,
Y. B. Li,
Y. C. Li,
Y. G. Li,
Y. P. Li,
Z. H. Li,
Z. J. Li,
Z. L. Li,
Z. X. Li,
Z. Y. Li,
C. Liang,
H. Liang,
Y. F. Liang,
Y. T. Liang,
Z. Z. Liang,
G. R. Liao,
L. B. Liao,
M. H. Liao,
Y. P. Liao,
J. Libby,
A. Limphirat,
C. C. Lin,
C. X. Lin,
D. X. Lin,
T. Lin,
B. J. Liu,
B. X. Liu,
C. Liu,
C. X. Liu,
F. Liu,
F. H. Liu,
Feng Liu,
G. M. Liu,
H. Liu,
H. B. Liu,
H. M. Liu,
Huihui Liu,
J. B. Liu,
J. J. Liu,
K. Liu,
K. Y. Liu,
Ke Liu,
Kun Liu,
L. Liu,
L. C. Liu,
Lu Liu,
M. H. Liu,
P. L. Liu,
Q. Liu,
S. B. Liu,
T. Liu,
W. M. Liu,
W. T. Liu,
X. Liu,
X. K. Liu,
X. L. Liu,
X. P. Liu,
X. T. Liu,
X. Y. Liu,
Y. Liu,
Y. B. Liu,
Yi Liu,
Z. A. Liu,
Z. D. Liu,
Z. L. Liu,
Z. Q. Liu,
Z. X. Liu,
Z. Y. Liu,
X. C. Lou,
H. J. Lu,
J. G. Lu,
X. L. Lu,
Y. Lu,
Y. H. Lu,
Y. P. Lu,
Z. H. Lu,
C. L. Luo,
J. R. Luo,
J. S. Luo,
M. X. Luo,
T. Luo,
X. L. Luo,
Z. Y. Lv,
X. R. Lyu,
Y. F. Lyu,
Y. H. Lyu,
F. C. Ma,
H. L. Ma,
Heng Ma,
J. L. Ma,
L. L. Ma,
L. R. Ma,
Q. M. Ma,
R. Q. Ma,
R. Y. Ma,
T. Ma,
X. T. Ma,
X. Y. Ma,
F. E. Maas,
I. MacKay,
M. Maggiora,
S. Maity,
S. Malde,
Y. J. Mao,
Z. P. Mao,
S. Marcello,
A. Marshall,
F. M. Melendi,
Y. H. Meng,
Z. X. Meng,
G. Mezzadri,
H. Miao,
T. J. Min,
R. E. Mitchell,
X. H. Mo,
B. Moses,
N. Yu. Muchnoi,
J. Muskalla,
Y. Nefedov,
F. Nerling,
H. Neuwirth,
Z. Ning,
S. Nisar,
Q. L. Niu,
W. D. Niu,
Y. Niu,
C. Normand,
S. L. Olsen,
Q. Ouyang,
I. V. Ovtin,
S. Pacetti,
Y. Pan,
A. Pathak,
Y. P. Pei,
M. Pelizaeus,
G. L. Peng,
H. P. Peng,
X. J. Peng,
Y. Y. Peng,
K. Peters,
K. Petridis,
J. L. Ping,
R. G. Ping,
S. Plura,
V. Prasad,
L. Pöpping,
F. Z. Qi,
H. R. Qi,
S. Qian,
W. B. Qian,
C. F. Qiao,
J. H. Qiao,
J. J. Qin,
J. L. Qin,
L. Q. Qin,
L. Y. Qin,
P. B. Qin,
X. P. Qin,
X. S. Qin,
Z. H. Qin,
J. F. Qiu,
Z. H. Qu,
J. Rademacker,
K. Ravindran,
C. F. Redmer,
A. Rivetti,
M. Rolo,
G. Rong,
S. S. Rong,
F. Rosini,
Ch. Rosner,
M. Q. Ruan,
W. R. Ruangyoo,
N. Salone,
A. Sarantsev,
Y. Schelhaas,
M. Schernau,
K. Schoenning,
M. Scodeggio,
W. Shan,
X. Y. Shan,
Z. J. Shang,
J. F. Shangguan,
L. G. Shao,
M. Shao,
C. P. Shen,
H. F. Shen,
W. H. Shen,
X. Y. Shen,
B. A. Shi,
Ch. Y. Shi,
H. Shi,
J. L. Shi,
J. Y. Shi,
M. H. Shi,
S. Y. Shi,
X. Shi,
H. L. Song,
J. J. Song,
M. H. Song,
T. Z. Song,
W. M. Song,
Y. X. Song,
Zirong Song,
S. Sosio,
S. Spataro,
S. Stansilaus,
F. Stieler,
M. Stolte,
S. S Su,
G. B. Sun,
G. X. Sun,
H. Sun,
H. K. Sun,
J. F. Sun,
K. Sun,
L. Sun,
R. Sun,
S. S. Sun,
T. Sun,
W. Y. Sun,
Y. C. Sun,
Y. H. Sun,
Y. J. Sun,
Y. Z. Sun,
Z. Q. Sun,
Z. T. Sun,
H. Tabaharizato,
N. T. Tagsinsit,
C. J. Tang,
G. Y. Tang,
J. Tang,
J. J. Tang,
L. F. Tang,
Y. A. Tang,
Z. H. Tang,
L. Y. Tao,
M. Tat,
J. X. Teng,
J. Y. Tian,
W. H. Tian,
Y. Tian,
Z. F. Tian,
K. Yu. Todyshev,
I. Uman,
E. van der Smagt,
B. Wang,
Bin Wang,
Bo Wang,
C. Wang,
Chao Wang,
Cong Wang,
D. Y. Wang,
F. K. Wang,
H. J. Wang,
H. R. Wang,
J. Wang,
J. J. Wang,
J. P. Wang,
K. Wang,
L. L. Wang,
L. W. Wang,
M. Wang,
Mi Wang,
N. Y. Wang,
P. Wang,
S. Wang,
Shun Wang,
T. Wang,
W. Wang,
W. P. Wang,
X. F. Wang,
X. L. Wang,
X. N. Wang,
Xin Wang,
Y. Wang,
Y. D. Wang,
Y. F. Wang,
Y. H. Wang,
Y. J. Wang,
Y. L. Wang,
Y. N. Wang,
Yanning Wang,
Yaqian Wang,
Yi Wang,
Yuan Wang,
Z. Wang,
Z. L. Wang,
Z. Q. Wang,
Z. Y. Wang,
Zhi Wang,
Ziyi Wang,
D. Wei,
D. H. Wei,
D. J. Wei,
H. R. Wei,
F. Weidner,
H. R. Wen,
S. P. Wen,
U. Wiedner,
G. Wilkinson,
M. Wolke,
J. F. Wu,
L. H. Wu,
L. J. Wu,
Lianjie Wu,
S. G. Wu,
S. M. Wu,
X. W. Wu,
Z. Wu,
H. L. Xia,
L. Xia,
B. H. Xiang,
D. Xiao,
G. Y. Xiao,
H. Xiao,
Y. L. Xiao,
Z. J. Xiao,
C. Xie,
K. J. Xie,
Y. Xie,
Y. G. Xie,
Y. H. Xie,
Z. P. Xie,
T. Y. Xing,
D. B. Xiong,
G. F. Xu,
H. Y. Xu,
Q. J. Xu,
Q. N. Xu,
T. D. Xu,
X. P. Xu,
Y. Xu,
Y. C. Xu,
Z. S. Xu,
F. Yan,
L. Yan,
W. B. Yan,
W. C. Yan,
W. H. Yan,
W. P. Yan,
X. Q. Yan,
Y. Y. Yan,
H. J. Yang,
H. L. Yang,
H. X. Yang,
J. H. Yang,
R. J. Yang,
X. Y. Yang,
Y. Yang,
Y. G. Yang,
Y. H. Yang,
Y. M. Yang,
Y. Q. Yang,
Y. Z. Yang,
Youhua Yang,
Z. Y. Yang,
W. J. Yao,
Z. P. Yao,
M. Ye,
M. H. Ye,
Z. J. Ye,
K. Yi,
Junhao Yin,
Z. Y. You,
B. X. Yu,
C. X. Yu,
G. Yu,
J. S. Yu,
L. W. Yu,
T. Yu,
X. D. Yu,
Y. C. Yu,
Yongchao Yu,
C. Z. Yuan,
H. Yuan,
J. Yuan,
Jie Yuan,
L. Yuan,
M. K. Yuan,
S. H. Yuan,
Y. Yuan,
C. X. Yue,
Ying Yue,
A. A. Zafar,
F. R. Zeng,
S. H. Zeng,
X. Zeng,
Y. J. Zeng,
Yujie Zeng,
Y. C. Zhai,
Y. H. Zhan,
B. L. Zhang,
B. X. Zhang,
D. H. Zhang,
G. Y. Zhang,
Gengyuan Zhang,
H. Zhang,
H. C. Zhang,
H. H. Zhang,
H. Q. Zhang,
H. R. Zhang,
H. Y. Zhang,
Han Zhang,
J. Zhang,
J. J. Zhang,
J. L. Zhang,
J. Q. Zhang,
J. S. Zhang,
J. W. Zhang,
J. X. Zhang,
J. Y. Zhang,
J. Z. Zhang,
Jianyu Zhang,
Jin Zhang,
Jiyuan Zhang,
L. M. Zhang,
Lei Zhang,
N. Zhang,
P. Zhang,
Q. Zhang,
Q. Y. Zhang,
Q. Z. Zhang,
R. Y. Zhang,
S. H. Zhang,
S. N. Zhang,
Shulei Zhang,
X. M. Zhang,
X. Y. Zhang,
Y. T. Zhang,
Y. H. Zhang,
Y. P. Zhang,
Yao Zhang,
Yu Zhang,
Yu Zhang,
Z. Zhang,
Z. D. Zhang,
Z. H. Zhang,
Z. L. Zhang,
Z. X. Zhang,
Z. Y. Zhang,
Zh. Zh. Zhang,
Zhilong Zhang,
Ziyang Zhang,
Ziyu Zhang,
G. Zhao,
J. -P. Zhao,
J. Y. Zhao,
J. Z. Zhao,
L. Zhao,
Lei Zhao,
M. G. Zhao,
R. P. Zhao,
S. J. Zhao,
Y. B. Zhao,
Y. L. Zhao,
Y. P. Zhao,
Y. X. Zhao,
Z. G. Zhao,
A. Zhemchugov,
B. Zheng,
B. M. Zheng,
J. P. Zheng,
W. J. Zheng,
W. Q. Zheng,
X. R. Zheng,
Y. H. Zheng,
B. Zhong,
C. Zhong,
X. Zhong,
H. Zhou,
J. Q. Zhou,
S. Zhou,
X. Zhou,
X. K. Zhou,
X. R. Zhou,
X. Y. Zhou,
Y. X. Zhou,
Y. Z. Zhou,
A. N. Zhu,
J. Zhu,
K. Zhu,
K. J. Zhu,
K. S. Zhu,
L. X. Zhu,
Lin Zhu,
S. H. Zhu,
T. J. Zhu,
W. D. Zhu,
W. J. Zhu,
W. Z. Zhu,
Y. C. Zhu,
Z. A. Zhu,
X. Y. Zhuang,
M. Zhuge,
J. H. Zou,
J. Zu
et al. (739 additional authors not shown)
Using $e^+e^-$ annihilation data collected at 26 center-of-mass energy points between 3000.00 and $3119.88~\text{MeV}$ with the BESIII detector, corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of about $440.7~\text{pb}^{-1}$, we study the cross section lineshape of $e^+e^-\to K_S^0 K^+π^-+c.c.$. The relative phases and magnitudes between $J/ψ$ strong and electromagnetic decay amplitudes are measured to be $(123.7\pm5.3)^\circ;4.31\pm0.22$ or $(-123.1\pm5.2)^\circ;4.38\pm0.22$, with corresponding branching fractions $\mathcal{B}(J/ψ\to K_S^0 K^+π^-+c.c.)=(5.17\pm0.20)$ or $(5.36\pm0.20)\times10^{-3}$. Based on a partial wave analysis, the cross sections of $e^+e^-\to\bar K^0 K^*(892)^0+c.c.$ and $e^+e^-\to K^+ K^*(892)^-+c.c.$ are obtained. For these subprocesses, the relative phases and magnitudes are determined as $(155.2\pm15.5)^{\circ};3.67\pm0.27$ or $(-154.1\pm15.5)^{\circ};3.71\pm0.25$ and $(180.1\pm31.8)^{\circ};25.06\pm2.51$, respectively. The large relative phases deviate from the orthogonality relation expected from experiment and from the assumption of purely real amplitudes by more than $3σ$. The measured branching fractions $\mathcal{B}(J/ψ\to\bar K^0 K^*(892)^0)+c.c.=(4.18\pm0.18)$ or $(4.31\pm0.19)\times10^{-3}$, $\mathcal{B}(J/ψ\to K^+ K^*(892)^-+c.c.)=(7.09\pm0.28)\times10^{-3}$ are all consistent with the world average values, but achieve better than a twofold improvement in precision. The ratios between the branching fractions of $J/ψ\to\bar K^0 K^*(892)^0+c.c.$ and $J/ψ\to\bar K^+ K^*(892)^-+c.c.$ are $\mathcal{R}_{K^*\bar{K}}=0.589\pm0.012$ or $0.612\pm0.013$. After subtracting the electromagnetic contribution, the corresponding strong amplitude ratios are $\mathcal{R}^{3g}_{K^*\bar{K}}=0.884\pm0.050$ or $0.909\pm0.044$, which deviate $2.3$ or $2.1σ$ from the unity. No evidence for direct $CP$ violation is observed.
Subject:
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Publish: 2026-06-10 12:03:35 UTC
Authors:
Kwang-Chang Lai,
Chung-Lin Shan
Following our earlier work on studying 3-dimensional nuclear recoil response to Galactic Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) in directional direct Dark Matter detectors, in this paper, we simulate 3-D coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEvNS) events induced by Solar B-8 neutrinos. Our numerical results show that, in contrast to the approximately fixed patterns of the WIMP-induced signals, the characteristic ring-like angular distributions of the nuclear recoil flux/energy of CEvNS events show clearly annual variations along the trajectories of the moving direction of incident Solar neutrinos in different celestial coordinate systems without experimentally distinguishable target dependence.
Subjects:
High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena
,
High Energy Physics - Experiment
,
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Publish: 2026-06-11 15:20:50 UTC
Authors:
Martina Beccaria,
Christoph A. Ternes
We consider different scenarios which lead to a damping of the neutrino oscillation probability and investigate their impact on the first JUNO results. First, we study decoherence effects due to wave packet separation. In addition, we consider an open quantum system framework and adopt a phenomenological approach which allows us to parameterize the energy dependence of the decoherence effects more freely. Finally, we study the effect of invisible neutrino decay. In all cases with the first data JUNO can already place competitive bounds on the parameter space of the scenarios under consideration, while also maintaining a robust measurement of the standard neutrino oscillation parameters.
Subjects:
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
,
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Publish: 2026-06-11 13:47:46 UTC
Authors:
Zhihao Xu,
Takumi Araki,
Simran Chauhan,
Brian C. Crow,
Max A. A. Dornfest,
Stephen T. Dye,
John Graham,
Misaki Hosoya,
Kunio Inoue,
John G. Learned,
Viacheslav A. Li,
William F. McDonough,
Takeru Ohno,
Takanobu Ono,
Taichi Sakai,
Jackson Seligman,
Nathan Sibert,
David Vartanyan,
Hiroko Watanabe,
Jeffrey Yepez
Geoneutrinos, electron antineutrinos produced by radioactive decays of heat-producing elements (HPEs) within the Earth, provide unique insights into Earth's interior and heat budget since their first detection in 2005 by KamLAND. Conventional geoneutrino detectors currently provide integrated global information and lack the capability to spatially resolve structures deep within the Earth. Here, we evaluate the ability of angular-sensitive geoneutrino detectors to distinguish between homogeneous and heterogeneous mantle models, focusing on Large Low Shear Velocity Provinces (LLSVPs). Our results show that LLSVPs enriched in Th and U yield a distinct flux of geoneutrinos with distinctive angular patterns. An oceanic site above the Pacific LLSVP is considered a particularly favorable detector location. The Ocean Bottom Detector (OBD) project aims to leverage this spatial resolving advantage by deploying a kiloton-scale liquid scintillator detector directly on the ocean floor, enabling unprecedented sensitivity for mantle geoneutrino detection. These findings demonstrate the critical role of combining geophysical and geochemical data to guide detector site selection, ultimately improving constraints on Earth's internal heat and the HPE distribution.
Subjects:
Geophysics
,
Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
,
High Energy Physics - Experiment
,
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Publish: 2026-06-11 12:25:48 UTC
Authors:
E. Estrada,
E. Passemar,
S. Paz,
A. Rodríguez-Sánchez,
P. Roig
Hadronic tau decays provide a unique low-energy laboratory for the charged-current interaction between quarks and leptons. Their use as an electroweak precision sector is, however, limited by nonperturbative QCD dynamics in the resonance region, encoded in hadronic form factors. In this work we show that angular information in two-hadron tau decays can be used to construct observables in which these form factors cancel, leading to first-principles Standard Model predictions up to light-quark-mass and radiative corrections. We derive the fully differential distributions for arbitrary two-pseudoscalar final states, including tau polarization, and extend them to the Weak Effective Field Theory at linear order in new-physics couplings. We then illustrate our strategy with several benchmark observables, for both unpolarized and polarized taus, whose Standard Model predictions can be obtained without modelling the dominant hadronic form factors and which receive characteristic beyond-the-Standard-Model corrections, in particular from tensor currents. These results provide concrete targets for Belle II, polarized-tau proposals such as Chiral Belle, and future high-statistics facilities, including super-tau-charm factories and FCC-ee, to test the electroweak structure of hadronic tau decays.
Subjects:
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
,
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Publish: 2026-06-11 10:04:12 UTC
Authors:
Jia-Ning Cui,
Fu-Lai Wang
Motivated by the observation of numerous charmed-strange hadrons lying close to the $K^{(*)}\bar D^{(*)}$ and $K^{(*)}D^{(*)}$ thresholds, we systematically investigate their mass spectra and electromagnetic characteristics, explicitly incorporating the $S$-$D$ wave mixing and coupled-channel effects. For the mass spectra, we employ the one-boson-exchange model and obtain several promising $K^{(*)}\bar D^{(*)}$ and $K^{(*)}D^{(*)}$ molecular candidates awaiting future experimental confirmation. The coupled-channel dynamics is found to play an essential role: it not only enhances binding in existing channels but also generates new loosely bound states that are absent in the single-channel approximation. Regarding the electromagnetic characteristics, we discuss the M1 radiative decay widths and magnetic moments of these charmed-strange molecular tetraquarks based on our obtained mass spectra and spatial wave functions within the constituent quark model. Our results demonstrate that the electromagnetic observables serve as valuable discriminants for clarifying the nature of these hadronic molecules. We encourage experimental collaborations to focus on such predicted charmed-strange molecular tetraquark candidates, especially the genuinely exotic $K^{(*)}\bar D^{(*)}$ states comprising four different flavors with valence quark content $\bar c \bar s u d$.
Subjects:
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
,
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Publish: 2026-06-11 09:14:09 UTC
Authors:
Moritz Bosse,
Gudrun Hiller,
Daniel Litim,
Fabio Maltoni,
Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf,
Simone Tentori,
Guotao Xia
The real scalar singlet extension of the standard model provides a minimal framework in which the Higgs sector can realise a strong first-order electroweak phase transition and improve the stability of the electroweak vacuum. We combine the electroweak phase transition and high-scale vacuum stability with current and projected collider probes, including precision Higgs measurements, the Higgs trilinear coupling, EWPO and resonant searches for a heavy singlet-like scalar in $ZZ$ and di-Higgs final states. Focusing on a singlet heavier than the standard model Higgs, we find that there is parameter space compatible with a strong first-order electroweak phase transition for singlet-like scalar masses up to nearly 1 TeV. Deviations in the Higgs self-coupling can be larger than those in the Higgs--$Z$ coupling, making Higgs-potential measurements a key probe. We find that the HL-LHC will test a large fraction of the parameter space, while the FCC will provide ultimate discovery and model-discrimination capabilities.
Subjects:
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
,
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Publish: 2026-06-10 18:00:04 UTC