Authors:
ENUBET collaboration,
L. Halić,
F. Acerbi,
I. Angelis,
L. Bomben,
M. Bonesini,
F. Bramati,
A. Branca,
C. Brizzolari,
G. Brunetti,
M. Calviani,
S. Capelli,
M. Capitani,
S. Carturan,
M. G. Catanesi,
S. Cecchini,
N. Charitonidis,
F. Cindolo,
G. Cogo,
G. Collazuol,
F. Dal Corso,
C. Delogu,
G. De Rosa,
A. Falcone,
B. Goddard,
A. Gola,
D. Guffanti,
F. Iacob,
M. A. Jebramcik,
C. Jollet,
V. Kain,
A. Kallitsopoulou,
B. Kliček,
Y. Kudenko,
Ch. Lampoudis,
M. Laveder,
P. Legou,
A. Longhin,
L. Ludovici,
E. Lutsenko,
L. Magaletti,
G. Mandrioli,
S. Marangoni,
A. Margotti,
V. Mascagna,
N. Mauri,
J. McElwee,
L. Meazza,
A. Meregaglia,
M. Mezzetto,
M. Nessi,
A. Paoloni,
M. Pari,
T. Papaevangelou,
E. G. Parozzi,
L. Pasqualini,
G. Paternoster,
L. Patrizii,
M. Pozzato,
M. Prest,
F. Pupilli,
E. Radicioni,
A. C. Ruggeri,
G. Saibene,
D. Sampsonidis,
A. Scanu,
C. Scian,
G. Sirri,
R. Speziali,
M. Stipčević,
M. Tenti,
F. Terranova,
M. Torti,
S. E. Tzamarias,
E. Vallazza,
F. Velotti,
L. Votano
et al. (47 additional authors not shown)
The ENUBET project recently concluded the R&D for a site independent design of a monitored neutrino beam for high precision cross section measurements, in which the neutrino flux is inferred from the measurement of charged leptons in an instrumented decay tunnel. In this phase three fundamental results were obtained and will be discussed here: 1) a beamline not requiring a horn and relying on static focusing elements allows to perform a νe cross section measurement in the DUNE energy range with 1% statistical uncertainty employing 1020 400 GeV protons on target (pot) and a neutrino detector of the size of ProtoDUNE; 2) the instrumentation of the decay tunnel, based on a cost effective sampling calorimeter solution, has been tested with a large scale prototype achieving the performance required to identify positrons and muons from kaon decays with high signal-to-noise ratio; 3) the systematics budget on the neutrino flux is constrained at the 1% level by fitting the charged leptons observables measured in the decay tunnel. Based on these successful results ENUBET is now pursuing a study for a site dependent implementation at CERN in the framework of Physics Beyond Colliders. In this context a new beamline, able to enrich the neutrino flux at the energy of HK and to reduce by more than a factor 3 the needed pot, has been designed and is being optimized. The civil engineering and radioprotection studies for the siting of ENUBET in the North Area towards the two ProtoDUNEs are also in the scope of this work, with the goal of proposing a neutrino cross section experiment in 2026. The combined use of both the neutrino detectors and of the improved beamline would allow to perform cross section measurements with unprecedented precision in about 5 years with a proton request compatible with the needs of other users after CERN Long Shutdown 3.
Subjects:
High Energy Physics - Experiment
,
Instrumentation and Detectors
Publish: 2025-01-08 14:23:15 UTC
Authors:
BESIII Collaboration,
M. Ablikim,
M. N. Achasov,
P. Adlarson,
O. Afedulidis,
X. C. Ai,
R. Aliberti,
A. Amoroso,
Q. An,
Y. Bai,
O. Bakina,
I. Balossino,
Y. Ban,
H. -R. Bao,
V. Batozskaya,
K. Begzsuren,
N. Berger,
M. Berlowski,
M. Bertani,
D. Bettoni,
F. Bianchi,
E. Bianco,
A. Bortone,
I. Boyko,
R. A. Briere,
A. Brueggemann,
H. Cai,
X. Cai,
A. Calcaterra,
G. F. Cao,
N. Cao,
S. A. Cetin,
X. Y. Chai,
J. F. Chang,
G. R. Che,
Y. Z. Che,
G. Chelkov,
C. Chen,
C. H. Chen,
Chao Chen,
G. Chen,
H. S. Chen,
H. Y. Chen,
M. L. Chen,
S. J. Chen,
S. L. Chen,
S. M. Chen,
T. Chen,
X. R. Chen,
X. T. Chen,
Y. B. Chen,
Y. Q. Chen,
Z. J. Chen,
S. K. Choi,
G. Cibinetto,
F. Cossio,
J. J. Cui,
H. L. Dai,
J. P. Dai,
A. Dbeyssi,
R. E. de Boer,
D. Dedovich,
C. Q. Deng,
Z. Y. Deng,
A. Denig,
I. Denysenko,
M. Destefanis,
F. De Mori,
B. Ding,
X. X. Ding,
Y. Ding,
Y. Ding,
J. Dong,
L. Y. Dong,
M. Y. Dong,
X. Dong,
M. C. Du,
S. X. Du,
Y. Y. Duan,
Z. H. Duan,
P. Egorov,
G. F. Fan,
J. J. Fan,
Y. H. Fan,
J. Fang,
J. Fang,
S. S. Fang,
W. X. Fang,
Y. Q. Fang,
R. Farinelli,
L. Fava,
F. Feldbauer,
G. Felici,
C. Q. Feng,
J. H. Feng,
Y. T. Feng,
M. Fritsch,
C. D. Fu,
J. L. Fu,
Y. W. Fu,
H. Gao,
X. B. Gao,
Y. N. Gao,
Y. N. Gao,
Yang Gao,
S. Garbolino,
I. Garzia,
P. T. Ge,
Z. W. Ge,
C. Geng,
E. M. Gersabeck,
A. Gilman,
K. Goetzen,
L. Gong,
W. X. Gong,
W. Gradl,
S. Gramigna,
M. Greco,
M. H. Gu,
Y. T. Gu,
C. Y. Guan,
A. Q. Guo,
L. B. Guo,
M. J. Guo,
R. P. Guo,
Y. P. Guo,
A. Guskov,
J. Gutierrez,
K. L. Han,
T. T. Han,
F. Hanisch,
X. Q. Hao,
F. A. Harris,
K. K. He,
K. L. He,
F. H. Heinsius,
C. H. Heinz,
Y. K. Heng,
C. Herold,
T. Holtmann,
P. C. Hong,
G. Y. Hou,
X. T. Hou,
Y. R. Hou,
Z. L. Hou,
B. Y. Hu,
H. M. Hu,
J. F. Hu,
Q. P. Hu,
S. L. Hu,
T. Hu,
Y. Hu,
G. S. Huang,
K. X. Huang,
L. Q. Huang,
P. Huang,
X. T. Huang,
Y. P. Huang,
Y. S. Huang,
T. Hussain,
F. Hölzken,
N. Hüsken,
N. in der Wiesche,
J. Jackson,
S. Janchiv,
Q. Ji,
Q. P. Ji,
W. Ji,
X. B. Ji,
X. L. Ji,
Y. Y. Ji,
X. Q. Jia,
Z. K. Jia,
D. Jiang,
H. B. Jiang,
P. C. Jiang,
S. S. Jiang,
T. J. Jiang,
X. S. Jiang,
Y. Jiang,
J. B. Jiao,
J. K. Jiao,
Z. Jiao,
S. Jin,
Y. Jin,
M. Q. Jing,
X. M. Jing,
T. Johansson,
S. Kabana,
N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki,
X. L. Kang,
X. S. Kang,
M. Kavatsyuk,
B. C. Ke,
V. Khachatryan,
A. Khoukaz,
R. Kiuchi,
O. B. Kolcu,
B. Kopf,
M. Kuessner,
X. Kui,
N. Kumar,
A. Kupsc,
W. Kühn,
W. N. Lan,
T. T. Lei,
Z. H. Lei,
M. Lellmann,
T. Lenz,
C. Li,
C. Li,
C. H. Li,
Cheng Li,
D. M. Li,
F. Li,
G. Li,
H. B. Li,
H. J. Li,
H. N. Li,
Hui Li,
J. R. Li,
J. S. Li,
K. Li,
K. L. Li,
L. J. Li,
Lei Li,
M. H. Li,
P. L. Li,
P. R. Li,
Q. M. Li,
Q. X. Li,
R. Li,
T. Li,
T. Y. Li,
W. D. Li,
W. G. Li,
X. Li,
X. H. Li,
X. L. Li,
X. Y. Li,
X. Z. Li,
Y. Li,
Y. G. Li,
Z. J. Li,
Z. Y. Li,
C. Liang,
H. Liang,
Y. F. Liang,
Y. T. Liang,
G. R. Liao,
Y. P. Liao,
J. Libby,
A. Limphirat,
C. C. Lin,
C. X. Lin,
D. X. Lin,
T. Lin,
B. J. Liu,
B. X. Liu,
C. Liu,
C. X. Liu,
F. Liu,
F. H. Liu,
Feng Liu,
G. M. Liu,
H. Liu,
H. B. Liu,
H. H. Liu,
H. M. Liu,
Huihui Liu,
J. B. Liu,
K. Liu,
K. Y. Liu,
Ke Liu,
L. Liu,
L. C. Liu,
Lu Liu,
M. H. Liu,
P. L. Liu,
Q. Liu,
S. B. Liu,
T. Liu,
W. K. Liu,
W. M. Liu,
X. Liu,
X. Liu,
Y. Liu,
Y. Liu,
Y. B. Liu,
Z. A. Liu,
Z. D. Liu,
Z. Q. Liu,
X. C. Lou,
F. X. Lu,
H. J. Lu,
J. G. Lu,
Y. Lu,
Y. P. Lu,
Z. H. Lu,
C. L. Luo,
J. R. Luo,
M. X. Luo,
T. Luo,
X. L. Luo,
X. R. Lyu,
Y. F. Lyu,
F. C. Ma,
H. Ma,
H. L. Ma,
J. L. Ma,
L. L. Ma,
L. R. Ma,
Q. M. Ma,
R. Q. Ma,
R. Y. Ma,
T. Ma,
X. T. Ma,
X. Y. Ma,
Y. M. Ma,
F. E. Maas,
I. MacKay,
M. Maggiora,
S. Malde,
Y. J. Mao,
Z. P. Mao,
S. Marcello,
Y. H. Meng,
Z. X. Meng,
J. G. Messchendorp,
G. Mezzadri,
H. Miao,
T. J. Min,
R. E. Mitchell,
X. H. Mo,
B. Moses,
N. Yu. Muchnoi,
J. Muskalla,
Y. Nefedov,
F. Nerling,
L. S. Nie,
I. B. Nikolaev,
Z. Ning,
S. Nisar,
Q. L. Niu,
W. D. Niu,
Y. Niu,
S. L. Olsen,
Q. Ouyang,
S. Pacetti,
X. Pan,
Y. Pan,
A. Pathak,
Y. P. Pei,
M. Pelizaeus,
H. P. Peng,
Y. Y. Peng,
K. Peters,
J. L. Ping,
R. G. Ping,
S. Plura,
V. Prasad,
F. Z. Qi,
H. R. Qi,
M. Qi,
S. Qian,
W. B. Qian,
C. F. Qiao,
J. H. Qiao,
J. J. Qin,
L. Q. Qin,
L. Y. Qin,
X. P. Qin,
X. S. Qin,
Z. H. Qin,
J. F. Qiu,
Z. H. Qu,
C. F. Redmer,
K. J. Ren,
A. Rivetti,
M. Rolo,
G. Rong,
Ch. Rosner,
M. Q. Ruan,
S. N. Ruan,
N. Salone,
A. Sarantsev,
Y. Schelhaas,
K. Schoenning,
M. Scodeggio,
K. Y. Shan,
W. Shan,
X. Y. Shan,
Z. J. Shang,
J. F. Shangguan,
L. G. Shao,
M. Shao,
C. P. Shen,
H. F. Shen,
W. H. Shen,
X. Y. Shen,
B. A. Shi,
H. Shi,
J. L. Shi,
J. Y. Shi,
S. Y. Shi,
X. Shi,
J. J. Song,
T. Z. Song,
W. M. Song,
Y. J. Song,
Y. X. Song,
S. Sosio,
S. Spataro,
F. Stieler,
S. S Su,
Y. J. Su,
G. B. Sun,
G. X. Sun,
H. Sun,
H. K. Sun,
J. F. Sun,
K. Sun,
L. Sun,
S. S. Sun,
T. Sun,
Y. J. Sun,
Y. Z. Sun,
Z. Q. Sun,
Z. T. Sun,
C. J. Tang,
G. Y. Tang,
J. Tang,
M. Tang,
Y. A. Tang,
L. Y. Tao,
M. Tat,
J. X. Teng,
V. Thoren,
W. H. Tian,
Y. Tian,
Z. F. Tian,
I. Uman,
Y. Wan,
S. J. Wang,
B. Wang,
Bo Wang,
C. Wang,
D. Y. Wang,
H. J. Wang,
J. J. Wang,
J. P. Wang,
K. Wang,
L. L. Wang,
L. W. Wang,
M. Wang,
N. Y. Wang,
S. Wang,
S. Wang,
T. Wang,
T. J. Wang,
W. Wang,
W. Wang,
W. P. Wang,
X. Wang,
X. F. Wang,
X. J. Wang,
X. L. Wang,
X. N. Wang,
Y. Wang,
Y. D. Wang,
Y. F. Wang,
Y. H. Wang,
Y. L. Wang,
Y. N. Wang,
Y. Q. Wang,
Yaqian Wang,
Yi Wang,
Z. Wang,
Z. L. Wang,
Z. Y. Wang,
D. H. Wei,
F. Weidner,
S. P. Wen,
Y. R. Wen,
U. Wiedner,
G. Wilkinson,
M. Wolke,
L. Wollenberg,
C. Wu,
J. F. Wu,
L. H. Wu,
L. J. Wu,
Lianjie Wu,
X. Wu,
X. H. Wu,
Y. H. Wu,
Y. J. Wu,
Z. Wu,
L. Xia,
X. M. Xian,
B. H. Xiang,
T. Xiang,
D. Xiao,
G. Y. Xiao,
H. Xiao,
Y. L. Xiao,
Z. J. Xiao,
C. Xie,
X. H. Xie,
Y. Xie,
Y. G. Xie,
Y. H. Xie,
Z. P. Xie,
T. Y. Xing,
C. F. Xu,
C. J. Xu,
G. F. Xu,
M. Xu,
Q. J. Xu,
Q. N. Xu,
W. L. Xu,
X. P. Xu,
Y. Xu,
Y. C. Xu,
Z. S. Xu,
F. Yan,
L. Yan,
W. B. Yan,
W. C. Yan,
W. P. Yan,
X. Q. Yan,
H. J. Yang,
H. L. Yang,
H. X. Yang,
J. H. Yang,
R. J. Yang,
T. Yang,
Y. Yang,
Y. F. Yang,
Y. X. Yang,
Y. Z. Yang,
Z. W. Yang,
Z. P. Yao,
M. Ye,
M. H. Ye,
Junhao Yin,
Z. Y. You,
B. X. Yu,
C. X. Yu,
G. Yu,
J. S. Yu,
M. C. Yu,
T. Yu,
X. D. Yu,
C. Z. Yuan,
J. Yuan,
J. Yuan,
L. Yuan,
S. C. Yuan,
Y. Yuan,
Z. Y. Yuan,
C. X. Yue,
Ying Yue,
A. A. Zafar,
F. R. Zeng,
S. H. Zeng,
X. Zeng,
Y. Zeng,
Y. J. Zeng,
Y. J. Zeng,
X. Y. Zhai,
Y. C. Zhai,
Y. H. Zhan,
A. Q. Zhang,
B. L. Zhang,
B. X. Zhang,
D. H. Zhang,
G. Y. Zhang,
H. Zhang,
H. Zhang,
H. C. Zhang,
H. H. Zhang,
H. Q. Zhang,
H. R. Zhang,
H. Y. Zhang,
J. Zhang,
J. Zhang,
J. J. Zhang,
J. L. Zhang,
J. Q. Zhang,
J. S. Zhang,
J. W. Zhang,
J. X. Zhang,
J. Y. Zhang,
J. Z. Zhang,
Jianyu Zhang,
L. M. Zhang,
Lei Zhang,
P. Zhang,
Q. Zhang,
Q. Y. Zhang,
R. Y. Zhang,
S. H. Zhang,
Shulei Zhang,
X. M. Zhang,
X. Y Zhang,
X. Y. Zhang,
Y. Zhang,
Y. Zhang,
Y. T. Zhang,
Y. H. Zhang,
Y. M. Zhang,
Yan Zhang,
Z. D. Zhang,
Z. H. Zhang,
Z. L. Zhang,
Z. X. Zhang,
Z. Y. Zhang,
Z. Y. Zhang,
Z. Z. Zhang,
Zh. Zh. Zhang,
G. Zhao,
J. Y. Zhao,
J. Z. Zhao,
L. Zhao,
Lei Zhao,
M. G. Zhao,
N. Zhao,
R. P. Zhao,
S. J. Zhao,
Y. B. Zhao,
Y. X. Zhao,
Z. G. Zhao,
A. Zhemchugov,
B. Zheng,
B. M. Zheng,
J. P. Zheng,
W. J. Zheng,
X. R. Zheng,
Y. H. Zheng,
B. Zhong,
X. Zhong,
H. Zhou,
J. Y. Zhou,
S. Zhou,
X. Zhou,
X. K. Zhou,
X. R. Zhou,
X. Y. Zhou,
Y. Z. Zhou,
Z. C. Zhou,
A. N. Zhu,
J. Zhu,
K. Zhu,
K. J. Zhu,
K. S. Zhu,
L. Zhu,
L. X. Zhu,
S. H. Zhu,
T. J. Zhu,
W. D. Zhu,
W. J. Zhu,
W. Z. Zhu,
Y. C. Zhu,
Z. A. Zhu,
J. H. Zou,
J. Zu
et al. (637 additional authors not shown)
We present the first amplitude analysis and branching fraction measurement of the decay D+s→π+π+π−π0π0, using e+e− collision data collected with the BESIII detector at center-of-mass energies between 4.128 and 4.226 GeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 7.33 fb−1, and report the first observation of the pure W-annihilation decay D+s→ωρ+ with a branching fraction of (0.99±0.08stat±0.07syst)%. In comparison to the low significance of the D wave in the decay D+s→ϕρ+, the dominance of the D wave over the S and P waves, with a fraction of (51.85±7.28stat±7.90syst)% observed in the decay, provides crucial information for the``polarization puzzle", as well as for the understanding of charm meson decays. The branching fraction of D+s→π+π+π−π0π0 is measured to be (4.41±0.15stat±0.13syst)%. Moreover, the branching fraction of D+s→ϕρ+ is measured to be (3.98±0.33stat±0.21syst)%, and the Rϕ=B(ϕ→π+π−π0)/B(ϕ→K+K−) is determined to be (0.222±0.019stat±0.016syst), which is consistent with the previous measurement based on charm meson decays, but deviates from the results from e+e− annihilation and K-N scattering experiments by more than 3σ.
Subject:
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Publish: 2025-01-08 12:08:38 UTC
Author:
Pietro Vischia
Designing the next generation colliders and detectors involves solving optimization problems in high-dimensional spaces where the optimal solutions may nest in regions that even a team of expert humans would not explore. Resorting to Artificial Intelligence to assist the experimental design introduces however significant computational challenges in terms of generation and processing of the data required to perform such optimizations: from the software point of view, differentiable programming makes the exploration of such spaces with gradient descent feasible; from the hardware point of view, the complexity of the resulting models and their optimization is prohibitive. To scale up to the complexity of the typical HEP collider experiment, a change in paradigma is required. In this contribution I will describe the first proofs-of-concept of gradient-based optimization of experimental design and implementations in neuromorphic hardware architectures, paving the way to more complex challenges.
Subjects:
High Energy Physics - Experiment
,
Instrumentation and Detectors
Publish: 2025-01-08 11:58:31 UTC
Authors:
BESIII Collaboration,
M. Ablikim,
M. N. Achasov,
P. Adlarson,
O. Afedulidis,
X. C. Ai,
R. Aliberti,
A. Amoroso,
Q. An,
Y. Bai,
O. Bakina,
I. Balossino,
Y. Ban,
H. -R. Bao,
V. Batozskaya,
K. Begzsuren,
N. Berger,
M. Berlowski,
M. Bertani,
D. Bettoni,
F. Bianchi,
E. Bianco,
A. Bortone,
I. Boyko,
R. A. Briere,
A. Brueggemann,
H. Cai,
X. Cai,
A. Calcaterra,
G. F. Cao,
N. Cao,
S. A. Cetin,
J. F. Chang,
G. R. Che,
Y. Z. Che,
G. Chelkov,
C. Chen,
C. H. Chen,
Chao Chen,
G. Chen,
H. S. Chen,
H. Y. Chen,
M. L. Chen,
S. J. Chen,
S. L. Chen,
S. M. Chen,
T. Chen,
X. R. Chen,
X. T. Chen,
Y. B. Chen,
Y. Q. Chen,
Y. Q. Chen,
Z. J. Chen,
Z. Y. Chen,
S. K. Choi,
X. Chu,
G. Cibinetto,
F. Cossio,
J. J. Cui,
H. L. Dai,
J. P. Dai,
A. Dbeyssi,
R. E. de Boer,
D. Dedovich,
C. Q. Deng,
Z. Y. Deng,
A. Denig,
I. Denysenko,
M. Destefanis,
F. De Mori,
B. Ding,
X. X. Ding,
Y. Ding,
Y. Ding,
J. Dong,
L. Y. Dong,
M. Y. Dong,
X. Dong,
M. C. Du,
S. X. Du,
Y. Y. Duan,
Z. H. Duan,
P. Egorov,
Y. H. Fan,
J. Fang,
J. Fang,
S. S. Fang,
W. X. Fang,
Y. Fang,
Y. Q. Fang,
R. Farinelli,
L. Fava,
F. Feldbauer,
G. Felici,
C. Q. Feng,
J. H. Feng,
Y. T. Feng,
M. Fritsch,
C. D. Fu,
J. L. Fu,
Y. W. Fu,
H. Gao,
X. B. Gao,
Y. Gao,
Y. N. Gao,
S. Garbolino,
I. Garzia,
P. T. Ge,
Z. W. Ge,
C. Geng,
E. M. Gersabeck,
A. Gilman,
K. Goetzen,
L. Gong,
W. X. Gong,
W. Gradl,
S. Gramigna,
M. Greco,
M. H. Gu,
Y. T. Gu,
C. Y. Guan,
A. Q. Guo,
L. B. Guo,
M. J. Guo,
R. P. Guo,
Y. P. Guo,
A. Guskov,
J. Gutierrez,
K. L. Han,
T. T. Han,
F. Hanisch,
X. Q. Hao,
F. A. Harris,
K. K. He,
K. L. He,
F. H. Heinsius,
C. H. Heinz,
Y. K. Heng,
C. Herold,
T. Holtmann,
P. C. Hong,
G. Y. Hou,
X. T. Hou,
Y. R. Hou,
Z. L. Hou,
H. M. Hu,
J. F. Hu,
S. L. Hu,
T. Hu,
Y. Hu,
G. S. Huang,
K. X. Huang,
L. Q. Huang,
X. T. Huang,
Y. P. Huang,
Y. S. Huang,
T. Hussain,
F. Hölzken,
N. Hüsken,
N. in der Wiesche,
J. Jackson,
Q. Ji,
Q. P. Ji,
W. Ji,
X. B. Ji,
X. L. Ji,
Y. Y. Ji,
X. Q. Jia,
Z. K. Jia,
D. Jiang,
H. B. Jiang,
P. C. Jiang,
S. S. Jiang,
T. J. Jiang,
X. S. Jiang,
Y. Jiang,
J. B. Jiao,
J. K. Jiao,
Z. Jiao,
S. Jin,
Y. Jin,
M. Q. Jing,
X. M. Jing,
T. Johansson,
S. Kabana,
N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki,
X. L. Kang,
X. S. Kang,
M. Kavatsyuk,
B. C. Ke,
V. Khachatryan,
A. Khoukaz,
R. Kiuchi,
O. B. Kolcu,
B. Kopf,
M. Kuessner,
X. Kui,
N. Kumar,
A. Kupsc,
W. Kühn,
J. J. Lane,
L. Lavezzi,
T. T. Lei,
M. Lellmann,
T. Lenz,
C. Li,
C. Li,
C. Li,
C. H. Li,
D. M. Li,
F. Li,
G. Li,
H. B. Li,
H. J. Li,
H. N. Li,
Hui Li,
J. R. Li,
J. S. Li,
K. Li,
K. L. Li,
L. J. Li,
L. K. Li,
Lei Li,
M. H. Li,
P. R. Li,
Q. M. Li,
Q. X. Li,
R. Li,
S. X. Li,
T. Li,
W. D. Li,
W. G. Li,
X. Li,
X. H. Li,
X. L. Li,
X. Y. Li,
X. Z. Li,
Y. G. Li,
Z. J. Li,
Z. Y. Li,
C. Liang,
H. Liang,
H. Liang,
Y. F. Liang,
Y. T. Liang,
G. R. Liao,
Y. P. Liao,
J. Libby,
A. Limphirat,
C. C. Lin,
D. X. Lin,
T. Lin,
B. J. Liu,
B. X. Liu,
C. Liu,
C. X. Liu,
F. Liu,
F. H. Liu,
Feng Liu,
G. M. Liu,
H. Liu,
H. B. Liu,
H. H. Liu,
H. M. Liu,
Huihui Liu,
J. B. Liu,
J. Y. Liu,
K. Liu,
K. Y. Liu,
Ke Liu,
L. Liu,
L. C. Liu,
Lu Liu,
M. H. Liu,
P. L. Liu,
Q. Liu,
S. B. Liu,
T. Liu,
W. K. Liu,
W. M. Liu,
X. Liu,
X. Liu,
Y. Liu,
Y. Liu,
Y. B. Liu,
Z. A. Liu,
Z. D. Liu,
Z. Q. Liu,
X. C. Lou,
F. X. Lu,
H. J. Lu,
J. G. Lu,
X. L. Lu,
X. L. Lu,
Y. Lu,
Y. P. Lu,
Z. H. Lu,
C. L. Luo,
J. R. Luo,
M. X. Luo,
T. Luo,
X. L. Luo,
X. R. Lyu,
Y. F. Lyu,
F. C. Ma,
H. Ma,
H. L. Ma,
J. L. Ma,
L. L. Ma,
L. R. Ma,
M. M. Ma,
Q. M. Ma,
R. Q. Ma,
T. Ma,
X. T. Ma,
X. Y. Ma,
Y. M. Ma,
F. E. Maas,
I. MacKay,
M. Maggiora,
S. Malde,
Q. A. Malik,
Y. J. Mao,
Z. P. Mao,
S. Marcello,
Z. X. Meng,
J. G. Messchendorp,
G. Mezzadri,
H. Miao,
T. J. Min,
R. E. Mitchell,
X. H. Mo,
B. Moses,
N. Yu. Muchnoi,
J. Muskalla,
Y. Nefedov,
F. Nerling,
L. S. Nie,
I. B. Nikolaev,
Z. Ning,
S. Nisar,
Q. L. Niu,
W. D. Niu,
Y. Niu,
S. L. Olsen,
Q. Ouyang,
S. Pacetti,
X. Pan,
Y. Pan,
Y. P. Pei,
M. Pelizaeus,
H. P. Peng,
Y. Y. Peng,
K. Peters,
J. L. Ping,
R. G. Ping,
S. Plura,
V. Prasad,
F. Z. Qi,
H. R. Qi,
M. Qi,
T. Y. Qi,
S. Qian,
W. B. Qian,
C. F. Qiao,
J. H. Qiao,
J. J. Qin,
L. Q. Qin,
L. Y. Qin,
X. P. Qin,
X. S. Qin,
Z. H. Qin,
J. F. Qiu,
Z. H. Qu,
C. F. Redmer,
K. J. Ren,
A. Rivetti,
M. Rolo,
G. Rong,
Ch. Rosner,
M. Q. Ruan,
S. N. Ruan,
N. Salone,
A. Sarantsev,
Y. Schelhaas,
K. Schoenning,
M. Scodeggio,
K. Y. Shan,
W. Shan,
X. Y. Shan,
Z. J. Shang,
J. F. Shangguan,
L. G. Shao,
M. Shao,
C. P. Shen,
H. F. Shen,
W. H. Shen,
X. Y. Shen,
B. A. Shi,
H. Shi,
J. L. Shi,
J. Y. Shi,
Q. Q. Shi,
S. Y. Shi,
X. Shi,
J. J. Song,
T. Z. Song,
W. M. Song,
Y. J. Song,
Y. X. Song,
S. Sosio,
S. Spataro,
F. Stieler,
S. S Su,
Y. J. Su,
G. B. Sun,
G. X. Sun,
H. Sun,
H. K. Sun,
J. F. Sun,
K. Sun,
L. Sun,
S. S. Sun,
T. Sun,
W. Y. Sun,
Y. Sun,
Y. J. Sun,
Y. Z. Sun,
Z. Q. Sun,
Z. T. Sun,
C. J. Tang,
G. Y. Tang,
J. Tang,
J. J. Tang,
Y. A. Tang,
L. Y. Tao,
Q. T. Tao,
M. Tat,
J. X. Teng,
W. H. Tian,
Y. Tian,
Z. F. Tian,
I. Uman,
Y. Wan,
S. J. Wang,
B. Wang,
B. L. Wang,
Bo Wang,
D. Y. Wang,
F. Wang,
H. J. Wang,
J. J. Wang,
J. P. Wang,
K. Wang,
L. L. Wang,
L. W. Wang,
M. Wang,
N. Y. Wang,
S. Wang,
S. Wang,
T. Wang,
T. J. Wang,
W. Wang,
W. Wang,
W. P. Wang,
X. Wang,
X. F. Wang,
X. J. Wang,
X. L. Wang,
X. N. Wang,
Y. Wang,
Y. D. Wang,
Y. F. Wang,
Y. H. Wang,
Y. L. Wang,
Y. N. Wang,
Y. Q. Wang,
Yaqian Wang,
Yi Wang,
Z. Wang,
Z. L. Wang,
Z. Y. Wang,
Ziyi Wang,
D. H. Wei,
F. Weidner,
S. P. Wen,
Y. R. Wen,
U. Wiedner,
G. Wilkinson,
M. Wolke,
L. Wollenberg,
C. Wu,
J. F. Wu,
L. H. Wu,
L. J. Wu,
X. Wu,
X. H. Wu,
Y. H. Wu,
Y. J. Wu,
Z. Wu,
L. Xia,
X. M. Xian,
B. H. Xiang,
D. Xiao,
G. Y. Xiao,
S. Y. Xiao,
Y. L. Xiao,
Z. J. Xiao,
C. Xie,
X. H. Xie,
Y. Xie,
Y. G. Xie,
Y. H. Xie,
Z. P. Xie,
T. Y. Xing,
C. F. Xu,
C. J. Xu,
G. F. Xu,
H. Y. Xu,
M. Xu,
Q. J. Xu,
Q. N. Xu,
W. Xu,
W. L. Xu,
X. P. Xu,
Y. Xu,
Y. C. Xu,
Z. S. Xu,
F. Yan,
L. Yan,
W. B. Yan,
W. C. Yan,
W. H. Yan,
X. Q. Yan,
H. J. Yang,
H. L. Yang,
H. X. Yang,
J. H. Yang,
T. Yang,
Y. Yang,
Y. F. Yang,
Y. F. Yang,
Y. X. Yang,
Z. W. Yang,
Z. P. Yao,
M. Ye,
M. H. Ye,
J. H. Yin,
Junhao Yin,
Z. Y. You,
B. X. Yu,
C. X. Yu,
G. Yu,
G. Yu,
J. S. Yu,
M. C. Yu,
T. Yu,
X. D. Yu,
C. Z. Yuan,
J. Yuan,
J. Yuan,
L. Yuan,
S. C. Yuan,
X. Q. Yuan,
Y. Yuan,
Z. Y. Yuan,
C. X. Yue,
A. A. Zafar,
F. R. Zeng,
S. H. Zeng,
X. Zeng,
Y. Zeng,
Y. J. Zeng,
Y. J. Zeng,
X. Y. Zhai,
Y. C. Zhai,
Y. H. Zhan,
A. Q. Zhang,
B. L. Zhang,
B. X. Zhang,
D. H. Zhang,
G. Y. Zhang,
H. Zhang,
H. Zhang,
H. C. Zhang,
H. H. Zhang,
H. H. Zhang,
H. Q. Zhang,
H. R. Zhang,
H. Y. Zhang,
J. Zhang,
J. Zhang,
J. J. Zhang,
J. L. Zhang,
J. Q. Zhang,
J. S. Zhang,
J. W. Zhang,
J. X. Zhang,
J. Y. Zhang,
J. Z. Zhang,
Jianyu Zhang,
L. M. Zhang,
Lei Zhang,
P. Zhang,
Q. Y. Zhang,
R. Y. Zhang,
S. H. Zhang,
Shulei Zhang,
X. D. Zhang,
X. M. Zhang,
X. Y Zhang,
X. Y. Zhang,
Y. Zhang,
Y. Zhang,
Y. T. Zhang,
Y. H. Zhang,
Y. M. Zhang,
Z. D. Zhang,
Z. H. Zhang,
Z. L. Zhang,
Z. Y. Zhang,
Z. Y. Zhang,
Z. Z. Zhang,
G. Zhao,
J. Y. Zhao,
J. Z. Zhao,
L. Zhao,
L. Zhao,
M. G. Zhao,
N. Zhao,
R. P. Zhao,
S. J. Zhao,
Y. B. Zhao,
Y. X. Zhao,
Z. G. Zhao,
A. Zhemchugov,
B. Zheng,
B. M. Zheng,
J. P. Zheng,
W. J. Zheng,
Y. H. Zheng,
B. Zhong,
J. Y. Zhou,
L. P. Zhou,
S. Zhou,
X. Zhou,
X. K. Zhou,
X. R. Zhou,
X. Y. Zhou,
Y. Z. Zhou,
A. N. Zhu,
J. Zhu,
K. Zhu,
K. J. Zhu,
K. S. Zhu,
L. Zhu,
L. X. Zhu,
S. H. Zhu,
T. J. Zhu,
W. D. Zhu,
Y. C. Zhu,
Z. A. Zhu,
J. H. Zou,
J. Zu
et al. (634 additional authors not shown)
We study the electromagnetic Dalitz decay J/ψ→e+e−π0 using (10087±44)×106 J/ψ events collected by the \bes detector. The di-electron-invariant-mass dependent transition form factor of this decay is explored for the first time. A significant resonant structure corresponding to the ρ/ω resonance is observed, which cannot be described by existing theoretical models, due to contributions from the isospin-conserving J/ψ→ρπ0 and isospin-volating J/ψ→ωπ0 decays. The observed ρ--ω interference is consistent with that of the pion form factor but features a relatively narrow ρ peak. By taking into account the contribution of this resonant structure, the branching fraction of J/ψ→e+e−π0 in the full e+e− invariant mass spectrum range is also measured for the first time to be (8.06±0.31(stat)±0.38(syst))×10−7, which is two times larger than the prediction of the Vector Meson Dominance model due to the observed resonant contribution of ρ/ω resonances.
Subject:
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Publish: 2025-01-08 08:40:21 UTC
Author:
Krystian Roslon
The official data collection for the Run 3 of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN in Geneva commenced on July 5, 2022, following approximately three and a half years of maintenance, upgrades, and commissioning. Among the many upgrades to ALICE (A Large Ion Collider Experiment) is the new Fast Interaction Trigger (FIT) detector. Constant improvements to FIT's hardware, firmware, and software will enable progressively better performance. Between November 2024 and March 2025, during the year-end technical stop, an update to the communication path between the Front-End Electronics (FEE) and the Detector Control System (DCS) is planned. This update will introduce a new approach based on the ALFRED (ALICE Low-Level Front-End Device) software, supported by the central DCS ALICE system. To address the challenge of integrating custom electronics with distributed control systems, this paper describes a novel extension of the Front-End Device (FRED) framework, which can interface bespoke electronics with standard SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) systems using IPbus. This framework can be applied to all detectors utilizing IPbus communication.
Subjects:
Instrumentation and Detectors
,
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Publish: 2025-01-08 18:48:42 UTC
Authors:
L. Bündgen,
R. V. Harlander,
S. Y. Klein,
M. C. Schaaf
A major update of the program FeynGame is introduced. One of its main new functionalities is to visualize Feynman graphs generated by QGRAF. The QGRAF output can be either pasted into the FeynGame canvas for individual graphs, or the whole QGRAF output file can be processed. In addition, a number of new features and improvements have been implemented into FeynGame-3.0 in order to further facilitate the efficient drawing of Feynman diagrams in publication quality. FeynGame is freely available as jar or MacOS app file from https://web.physik.rwth-aachen.de/user/harlander/software/feyngame, and as source code from https://gitlab.com/feyngame/FeynGame.
Subjects:
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
,
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Publish: 2025-01-08 18:05:24 UTC
Authors:
Francesco Rosini,
Simone Pacetti
Assuming isospin conservation, the decay of a cˉc vector meson into the ΛˉΣ0+c.c. final state is purely electromagnetic. At the leading order, the cˉc vector meson first converts into a virtual photon that, then produces the ΛˉΣ0+c.c. final state. Moreover, such a mechanism, i.e., the virtual photon coupling to \LS, is the solely intermediate process through which, in Born approximation, the reaction e+e−→ΛˉΣ0+c.c. does proceed. It follows that any significant difference between the amplitudes of the processes cˉc→ΛˉΣ0+c.c. and e+e−→ΛˉΣ0+c.c. at the cˉc mass must be ascribed to an isospin-violating contribution in the cˉc decay. In Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 903 (2020) we studied the decay of the ψ(2S) vector meson into ΛˉΣ0+c.c. and, on the light of the large branching fraction BR18(ψ(2S)→ΛˉΣ0+c.c.)=(1.23±0.24)×10−5, published in the 2018 edition of the Review of Particle Physics Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018), we claimed either the presence of a significant isospin-violating contribution or, with a lesser emphasis, a "not complete reliability of the only available datum". In any case, we propose a new measurement. Apparently, our second and considered less serious hypothesis was the right one, indeed the branching fraction published in the 2024 edition of the Review of Particle Physics Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024) is BR(ψ(2S)→ΛˉΣ0+c.c.)=(1.6±0.7)×10−6, more than seven times lower with the error that increased from ∼20% to ∼45%.
Subjects:
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
,
High Energy Physics - Experiment
,
Nuclear Theory
Publish: 2025-01-08 12:00:28 UTC
Authors:
Takuya Morozumi,
Tomoharu Tahara
We derive the probability for chiral oscillation of Majorana neutrinos based on quantum field theory. Since the Hamiltonian under the Majorana mass term does not conserve lepton number, the eigenstates of lepton number change continuously over time. Therefore, the transition amplitude is described by the inner product of the eigenstates of lepton number at the time of the neutrino production and the detection. With the Bogoliubov transformation, we successfully relates the lepton number eigenstates at different times. This method enables us to understand the time variation of lepton number induced by chiral oscillations in terms of transition probabilities. We also present the physical picture that emerges through the Bogoliubov transformation.
Subjects:
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
,
High Energy Physics - Experiment
,
High Energy Physics - Theory
Publish: 2025-01-08 07:34:46 UTC
Authors:
Anibal D. Medina,
Nicolás I. Mileo,
Alejandro Szynkman,
Santiago A. Tanco,
Carlos E. M. Wagner,
Gabriel Zapata
Gauge anomalous quantum field theories are inconsistent as full UV theories since they lead to the breaking of Lorentz invariance or Unitarity, as well as non-renormalizability. It is well known, however, that they can be interpreted as effective field theories (EFT) with a cut-off. The latter cannot be made arbitrarily large and it is related to the energy scale at which additional fermions with suitable gauge charges enter, rendering the full model anomaly-free. A nondecoupling effect that remains in the EFT is the appearance of anomalous loop-induced triple-gauge couplings, encapsulating information from the full UV theory. In this work we take as an example an Abelian gauge symmetry U(1)′μ under which 2nd-generation leptons are axially charged, leading to an EFT that consists of the Standard Model (SM) with an additional massive Z′ gauge boson. As a consequence, there are triple gauge couplings involving the Z′ and Electroweak SM gauge bosons via mixed gauge anomalies. We study the possibility of probing these loop suppressed anomalous couplings at hadron and lepton colliders, with Z′-lepton couplings allowed by current experimental bounds, finding that due to the large SM backgrounds and small signal, the HL-LHC is incapable of this task. The 100 TeV pp collider at L=20 ab−1 on the other hand could probe anomalous couplings for mZ′∈[150,800] GeV and obtain discovery significances for mZ′∈[230,330] GeV. Lepton colliders are also well suited for probing these anomalous couplings. In particular we show that a muon collider running at the Z′-resonance and an electron-positron collider such as CLIC with √s=3 TeV can be complimentary in probing the anomalous couplings for mZ′∈[100,700] GeV, with CLIC sensitive to discovery for mZ′∈[125,225] GeV.
Subjects:
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
,
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Publish: 2025-01-07 20:45:13 UTC
Author:
Naoki Otani
The NINJA experiment aims to precisely measure neutrino-nucleus interactions using a nuclear emulsion detector to reduce systematic errors in neutrino oscillation experiments. The nuclear emulsion has a sub-micron positional resolution, enabling the detection of low-momentum charged particles such as protons with a threshold of 200 MeV/c. In the NINJA experiment, a muon detector placed downstream of the emulsion detector is used to identify muons from νμ charged-current interactions. The majority of the tracks accumulated in the nuclear emulsion are from cosmic rays. Although the emulsion detector provides highly accurate positional information, it lacks timing information. Therefore, the positional resolution of the muon detector is not enough to identify neutrino interaction tracks that match between the muon detector and the emulsion detector from the enormous background of cosmic rays recorded in the emulsion detector. To address this, a scintillation tracker is used to provide both timing and positional information for the tracks. The NINJA experiment is planning a third physics run with about 130 kg water target from the autumn of 2025 to the spring of 2026. Since the target mass is larger than previous runs, a larger scintillation tracker covering 1.3 m × 1.4 m is needed. We are developing a newly designed scintillation tracker, consisting of a monolithic plastic scintillator plane including scatterers. In this paper, we will show the preparation status and plan for the next physics run, focusing particularly on the development of the new scintillation tracker.
Subjects:
Instrumentation and Detectors
,
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Publish: 2025-01-07 19:59:33 UTC
Authors:
C. -P. Liu,
Mukesh K. Pandey,
Lakhwinder Singh,
Chih-Pan Wu,
Jiunn-Wei Chen,
Hsin-Chang Chi,
Henry T. Wong
Direct searches of dark matter candidates with mass energies less than 1 GeV is an active research field. The energy depositions are comparable to the scale of atomic, molecular, or condensed matter systems, therefore many-body physics plays an important role in understanding the detector's response in dark matter scattering. We present in this work a comprehensive data set of atomic response functions for xenon and germanium with 12.2 and 80 eV energy thresholds, respectively, using the (multiconfiguration) relativistic random phase approximation. This approach takes into account the relativistic, exchange, and correlation effects in one self-consistent framework, and is benchmarked successfully by photoabsorption data from thresholds to 30 keV with ≲ errors. Comparisons with our previous and some other independent particle approaches in literature are made. It is also found that the spin-dependent (SD) response has significant difference from the spin-independent (SI) one such that the dark matter SD and SI interactions with electrons can be distinguished in unpolarized scattering, which is typical for direct search detectors. Finally, the exclusion limits set by current experiments are updated with our new results.
Subjects:
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
,
High Energy Physics - Experiment
,
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Publish: 2024-12-25 10:23:13 UTC
Authors:
M. Consoli,
L. Cosmai,
F. Fabbri,
G. Rupp
An alternative to the idea of a metastable electroweak vacuum would be an initial restriction to the pure scalar sector of the Standard Model, but describing spontaneous symmetry breaking consistently with studies indicating that there are two different mass scales in the problem: a mass scale M_H associated with the zero-point energy and a mass scale m_h defined by the quadratic shape of the potential at its minimum. Therefore, differently from perturbation theory where these two mass scales coincide, the Higgs field could exhibit a second resonance with mass (M_H)^{\rm Theor} = 690\,(30) GeV. This stabilises the potential, but the heavy Higgs H would couple to longitudinal Ws with the same typical strength as the low-mass state with m_h=125 GeV and so would still remain a relatively narrow resonance. While interesting signals from LHC experiments were previously pointed out, we have now enlarged our data sample, sharpened the analysis of some final states, and noted correlations between different channels that point directly to such a second resonance. The combined statistical evidence, even if roughly estimated, is thus so large that the observed deviations from the background cannot represent statistical fluctuations.
Subject:
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Publish: 2025-01-07 11:28:45 UTC
Authors:
Juzheng Liang,
Siyang Chen,
Ying Chen,
Chunjiang Shi,
Wei Sun
We explore the decay properties of the isovector and isoscalar 1^{-+} light hybrids, \pi_1 and \eta_1, in N_f=2 lattice QCD at a pion mass m_\pi \approx 417~\mathrm{MeV}. The McNeile and Michael method is adopted to extract the effective couplings for individual decay modes, which are used to estimate the partial decay widths of \pi_1(1600) and \eta_1(1855) by assuming SU(3) symmetry. The partial decay widths of \pi_1(1600) are predicted to be (\Gamma_{b_1\pi}, \Gamma_{f_1(1285)\pi}, \Gamma_{\rho\pi}, \Gamma_{K^*\bar{K}}) = (323 \pm 72, \mathcal{O}(10), 48 \pm 7, 7.9 \pm 1.3)~\mathrm{MeV}, and the total width is estimated to be 390 \pm 88~\mathrm{MeV}, considering only statistical errors. If \eta_1(1855) and the 4.4\sigma signal observed by BESIII (labeled as \eta_1(2200)) are taken as the two mass eigenstates of the isoscalar 1^{-+} light hybrids in SU(3), then the dominant decay channel(s) of \eta_1(1855) (\eta_1(2200)) is K_1(1270)\bar{K} (K_1(1270)\bar{K} and K_1(1400)\bar{K}) through the 1^{+(-)}0^{-(+)} mode. The vector-vector decay modes are also significant for the two \eta_1 states. Using the mixing angle \alpha \approx 22.7^\circ obtained from lattice QCD for the two \eta_1 states, the total widths are estimated to be \Gamma_{\eta_1(1855)}=268(91)~\mathrm{MeV} and \Gamma_{\eta_1(2200)}=435(154)~\mathrm{MeV}. The former is compatible with the experimental width of \eta_1(1855). Although many systematic uncertainties are not well controlled, these results are qualitatively informative for the experimental search for light hybrids.
Subject:
High Energy Physics - Lattice
Publish: 2024-09-22 12:11:34 UTC
Authors:
Ubaldo Iriso,
Laura Torino,
Chris Carilli,
Bojan Nikolic,
Nithyanandan Thyagarajan
Emittance measurements using synchrotron radiation are usually performed using x-rays to avoid diffraction limits. Interferometric techniques using visible light are also used to measure either the horizontal or the vertical beam projection. Several measurements rotating the interferometry axis are needed to obtain a full beam reconstruction. In this report we present a new interferometric multi-aperture masking technique and data analysis, inspired by astronomical methods, that are able to provide a full 2-D transverse beam reconstruction in a single acquisition. Results of beam characterization obtained at ALBA synchrotron light source will also been shown.
Subjects:
Accelerator Physics
,
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
,
Instrumentation and Detectors
,
Optics
Publish: 2024-09-17 12:42:10 UTC