Instrumentation and Detectors

2024-10-30 | | Total: 3

#1 ALICE Upgrades [PDF] [Copy] [Kimi] [REL]

Author: Felix Reidt

The ALICE collaboration prepares multiple upgrades to further extend the reach of heavy-ion physics at the LHC. For LHC Run 4 (2030-2033), a Forward Calorimeter (FoCal) system combines a high-granularity electromagnetic silicon-tungsten calorimeter with a conventional hadronic calorimeter leading to an excellent two-shower separation for neutral pion reconstruction and photon isolation. Direct photon measurements with FoCal will uniquely constrain the low-x gluon structure of protons and nuclei via forward measurements of direct photons. Additionally, ALICE will employ bent, wafer-scale pixel sensors achieving truly cylindrical tracking layers with very low material budget. These layers will replace the three innermost layers of the Inner Tracking System resulting in an improvement in pointing resolution allowing new measurements of heavy-flavour hadrons and dielectrons. For Run 5 and beyond, a next-generation detector system, ALICE 3, has been conceived to gain unique access to the interaction and thermalization of heavy flavour probes in the QGP as well as to the thermal radiation carrying information about the temperature and the restoration of chiral symmetry. At its core, it combines a high-resolution vertex detector with a large-acceptance silicon pixel tracker. For the identification of particles, a combination of a time-of-flight system, a ring-imaging Cherenkov detector, an electromagnetic calorimeter, a muon identifier, and a dedicated forward detector for ultra-soft photons, are envisaged.

Subjects: Instrumentation and Detectors ; High Energy Physics - Experiment ; Nuclear Experiment

Publish: 2024-10-29 16:47:20 UTC

#2 In-situ Transmission Kikuchi Diffraction Nano-tensile Testing [PDF] [Copy] [Kimi] [REL]

Authors: Tijmen Vermeij ; Amit Sharma ; Douglas Steinbach ; Jun Lou ; Johann Michler ; Xavier Maeder

We present a novel methodology for in-situ Transmission Kikuchi Diffraction (TKD) nano-tensile testing that enables nanoscale characterization of the evolution of complex plasticity mechanisms. By integrating a modified in-situ Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) nanoindenter with a microscale push-to-pull device and a conventional Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) detector, we achieved TKD measurements at high spatial resolution during mechanical deformation. A dedicated Focused Ion Beam (FIB) procedure was developed for site-specific specimen fabrication, including lift-out, thinning, and shaping into a dog-bone geometry. The methodology was demonstrated on two case studies: (i) a metastable $\beta$-Ti single crystal, on which we quantified the initiation and evolution of nanoscale twinning and stress-induced martensitic transformation, and (ii) a $CuAl/Al_2O_3$ nanolaminate, which showed nanoscale plasticity and twinning/detwinning in a complex microstructure. Overall, this approach provides a robust alternative to in-situ EBSD and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) testing, facilitating detailed analysis of deformation mechanisms at the nanoscale.

Subjects: Materials Science ; Instrumentation and Detectors

Publish: 2024-10-29 15:07:12 UTC

#3 CaloChallenge 2022: A Community Challenge for Fast Calorimeter Simulation [PDF] [Copy] [Kimi] [REL]

Authors: Claudius Krause ; Michele Faucci Giannelli ; Gregor Kasieczka ; Benjamin Nachman ; Dalila Salamani ; David Shih ; Anna Zaborowska ; Oz Amram ; Kerstin Borras ; Matthew R. Buckley ; Erik Buhmann ; Thorsten Buss ; Renato Paulo Da Costa Cardoso ; Anthony L. Caterini ; Nadezda Chernyavskaya ; Federico A. G. Corchia ; Jesse C. Cresswell ; Sascha Diefenbacher ; Etienne Dreyer ; Vijay Ekambaram ; Engin Eren ; Florian Ernst ; Luigi Favaro ; Matteo Franchini ; Frank Gaede ; Eilam Gross ; Shih-Chieh Hsu ; Kristina Jaruskova ; Benno Käch ; Jayant Kalagnanam ; Raghav Kansal ; Taewoo Kim ; Dmitrii Kobylianskii ; Anatolii Korol ; William Korcari ; Dirk Krücker ; Katja Krüger ; Marco Letizia ; Shu Li ; Qibin Liu ; Xiulong Liu ; Gabriel Loaiza-Ganem ; Thandikire Madula ; Peter McKeown ; Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ; Vinicius Mikuni ; Nam Nguyen ; Ayodele Ore ; Sofia Palacios Schweitzer ; Ian Pang ; Kevin Pedro ; Tilman Plehn ; Witold Pokorski ; Huilin Qu ; Piyush Raikwar ; John A. Raine ; Humberto Reyes-Gonzalez ; Lorenzo Rinaldi ; Brendan Leigh Ross ; Moritz A. W. Scham ; Simon Schnake ; Chase Shimmin ; Eli Shlizerman ; Nathalie Soybelman ; Mudhakar Srivatsa ; Kalliopi Tsolaki ; Sofia Vallecorsa ; Kyongmin Yeo ; Rui Zhang

We present the results of the "Fast Calorimeter Simulation Challenge 2022" - the CaloChallenge. We study state-of-the-art generative models on four calorimeter shower datasets of increasing dimensionality, ranging from a few hundred voxels to a few tens of thousand voxels. The 31 individual submissions span a wide range of current popular generative architectures, including Variational AutoEncoders (VAEs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Normalizing Flows, Diffusion models, and models based on Conditional Flow Matching. We compare all submissions in terms of quality of generated calorimeter showers, as well as shower generation time and model size. To assess the quality we use a broad range of different metrics including differences in 1-dimensional histograms of observables, KPD/FPD scores, AUCs of binary classifiers, and the log-posterior of a multiclass classifier. The results of the CaloChallenge provide the most complete and comprehensive survey of cutting-edge approaches to calorimeter fast simulation to date. In addition, our work provides a uniquely detailed perspective on the important problem of how to evaluate generative models. As such, the results presented here should be applicable for other domains that use generative AI and require fast and faithful generation of samples in a large phase space.

Subjects: Machine Learning ; High Energy Physics - Experiment ; High Energy Physics - Phenomenology ; Instrumentation and Detectors

Publish: 2024-10-28 23:28:07 UTC